• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Priory House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Prittlewell Chase, Westcliff On Sea, Essex, SS0 0SR (01702) 344145

Provided and run by:
Southend City Council Children, Young People and Families Public Health Service

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 2 June 2017

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection checked whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

This inspection took place on 8 and 11 May 2017 and was unannounced. The inspection was carried out by one inspector and an expert by experience. An expert by experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

We reviewed information that we hold about the service such as safeguarding information and notifications. Notifications are the events happening in the service that the provider is required to tell us about. We used this information to plan what areas we were going to focus on during our inspection.

During the inspection we used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us.

We spoke with 11 people, four of their relatives, the registered manager, two team leaders, one visiting professional, one health and social care professional and nine members of staff. We reviewed four people’s care files, four staff recruitment and support files, training records and quality assurance information.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 2 June 2017

Priory House is a residential care home for up to 28 adults some of whom may be living with dementia. The service provides 20 permanent beds, two respite (short break) beds and six rehabilitation beds (for up to two weeks after discharge from hospital). When we inspected there were 24 people living in the service of which two were on respite and five were there for rehabilitation.

At the last inspection, the service was rated good and at this inspection we found the service remains good.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People received a safe service and were protected from the risk of harm. There were enough staff that had been safely recruited to help keep people safe and to meet their needs. People received their medication as prescribed.

People were cared for by supported, experienced and trained staff. The service ensured that people had the support they needed to have as much choice and control over their lives in the least restrictive way possible. People received sufficient food and drink to meet their needs and preferences and their healthcare needs were met.

Staff knew the people they cared for well and were kind, caring and compassionate in their approach. People were encouraged and supported to remain as independent as possible. Staff ensured that people were treated with dignity and respect and their privacy was maintained at all times.

People were fully involved in the assessment and care planning process. Their care plans had been regularly reviewed to reflect their changing needs. People were encouraged and supported to participate in a range of activities to suit their individual interests. Complaints were dealt with appropriately in a timely way.

People were positive about the quality of the service. The registered manager and staff were committed to providing people with good quality person centred care that met their needs and preferences. There were systems in place to monitor the quality of the service and to drive improvements. The service met all relevant fundamental standards.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.