• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Rathgar Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

349 Kettering Road, Spinney Hill, Northampton, Northamptonshire, NN3 6QT (01604) 499003

Provided and run by:
Golden Care (UK) Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

24 and 29 April 2015

During a routine inspection

This unannounced inspection took place on the 24 and 29 April 2015.

Rathgar Care Home accommodates and provides care for up to 23 older people, most of whom have dementia care needs. There were 22 people in residence during this inspection.

A registered manager was in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.

People were assured that there were sufficient numbers of staff that had acquired the skills they needed through training and experience to meet their needs. Recruitment procedures were robust and protected people from the poor practice of unsuitable staff compromising their safety.

People’s care plans reflected their individuality and their needs were regularly reviewed. People’s benefited from receiving care from staff that listened to and acted upon what they said, including the views of their relatives, friends, or significant others. Staff understood their duties and carried them out diligently. Their manner was friendly and they encouraged people to retain as much independence as their capabilities allowed. There were spontaneous as well as regularly organised activities to stimulate people’s interest.

People’s healthcare needs were met. They had routine and ‘as needed’ access to a wide range of community based health professionals. Community based healthcare professionals were appropriately consulted, and their advice and prescribed treatments acted upon, to help sustain people’s health and wellbeing.

People said they enjoyed their food and had plenty to eat and drink. They enjoyed a varied and balanced diet to meet their nutritional needs. Meal portions suited people’s appetites and choices of food suited people’s individual preferences and tastes. Snacks were readily available. People who needed support with eating or drinking received the help they required.

People’s medicines were securely stored and there were suitable arrangements for the disposal of discontinued medicines. Medicines were competently administered by staff in a timely way.

People’s quality of care was effectively monitored by the audits regularly conducted by the registered manager and the provider.

People and their representatives knew how and who to complain to. They were assured that they would be listened to and that appropriate remedial action would be taken to try to resolve matters to their satisfaction.

15 April 2014

During a routine inspection

The inspection was carried out by an inspector who gathered evidence to help us answer our five questions; Is the service safe? Is the service effective? Is the service caring? Is the service responsive to people's needs? Is the service well-led?

Below is a summary of what we found. The summary is based on our observations during the inspection, speaking with people using the service, the staff supporting them and from looking at records.

The detailed evidence supporting our summary can be read in our full report.

Is the service safe?

People's needs had been appropriately assessed before they were admitted to Rathgar Care Home. We found that after admission to the home, needs were regularly reassessed to ensure people received the safe care they needed. This meant that staff had the information they needed to minimise identified risks to people's safety and welfare.

Visitors arriving at the home were required to wait for a staff member to answer the front door. They were then asked to sign the visitors' book when they entered the building. This meant that people were protected from unauthorised entry by persons who had no legitimate cause to be in the home as a visitor or tradesperson.

There were suitable arrangements in place to respond to emergencies. The manager or the provider was available 'on call' to support staff to manage an emergency situation safely and in a timely way.

We found that the equipment in place for staff to use to support people with their care needs was appropriately maintained and serviced. We saw that the premises were kept clean and that safety equipment, such as the fire alarm and call bells, were regularly tested and kept in good working order. This meant that people were cared for in a safe, well maintained environment.

Is the service effective?

When we spoke with three staff and looked at their records, we found that they had received the information, training and managerial support they needed to do their job effectively. We observed staff going about their duties and saw that they were confident and interacted with people in a positive manner. When we spoke with staff, we concluded that they had a good knowledge of each person's care needs and preferences because they were able to tell us about the support people needed, and how they delivered their care. When we looked at the care records for five people we saw that what staff had told us was accurately reflected in each person's care plan. This meant that people's needs were effectively met at Rathgar Care Home.

Where people's ability to choose had been compromised by their dementia, we saw there was appropriate information about their care needs and abilities. This meant that staff were guided to support people to express themselves and make their feelings and wishes known.

Is the service caring?

The staff presented as friendly and helpful. We heard staff encourage people to do things for themselves but they made sure people were safe, and provided them with timely assistance whenever that was appropriate. One person said, 'If I have a bit of a struggle doing something they never rush me. They are always there if I need help. They are all very thoughtful and kind to me.'

Is the service responsive to people's needs?

We saw that there was enough staff on duty to meet people's needs. This was also confirmed by the three staff, four visitors, and four people we spoke with. People said they never had to wait for long if they needed assistance. We heard that call bells were never left unanswered for more than a minute or two.

The three staff we spoke with had a good understanding of how to support people in a way that respected each person as an individual, each with their own needs and wishes.

Is the service well-led?

When we inspected this service, we found that the new manager had only been in post for a few weeks. The staff we spoke with said the manager was approachable, knowledgeable, and encouraged them to come up with creative ideas for improving people's quality of life. They said they could rely on the manager for guidance and support. They also said that the provider was a frequent visitor to the home and was friendly, conscientious, and committed to providing people with a good standard of care.

One visitor said, 'I would have no hesitation to go to any of the staff, the manager, or the owners if I was unhappy about anything in the home. If I was worried they would sort it out. I am confident about that. They like to hear what you think and that is very reassuring.'

Rathgar Care Home did not have a registered manager in post at the time of inspection as the previous registered manager had left a few weeks previously after many years of service. The new manager was in the process of applying to register with the Care Quality Commission (CQC).

22 July 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This inspection was a follow up inspection on the areas of non-compliance from the previous inspection. We focussed on cleanliness and infection control, and safety and suitability of premises. As such we did not need to speak to people about these areas.

We found that the provider had made suitable improvements to the safety and suitability of the premises, and the bathroom had been completely refurbished, however we identified concerns with the cleanliness and infection control arrangements at the home, and the records the provider maintained to show that the necessary cleaning had been completed.

30 April 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with five people who lived at Rathgar Care Home and three relatives of people who used the service. One person who lived at the home told us that they liked living at the home as they liked to have company and another person told us that the staff were very kind to them. One relative told us that the staff have a lot of patience and another relative told us that they did not have any concerns about the care that was provided to their relative.

We found concerns with the cleanliness and infection control arrangements and the suitability of the communal bathroom.

7 September 2012

During a routine inspection

Some people were unable to speak with us because their dementia had impaired their ability to communicate verbally.

We used a number of different methods to help us understand the experiences of people using the service. For example, we spoke with one person in the privacy of their room who was able to tell us about their experience of living at Rathgar. They told us their care was "excellent". They said, "The staff are very thoughtful, very kind." They told us they enjoyed their meals and received the care and help they needed. This person also said, "The staff know I am a very private person. I like to spend much of my time in my room. I am happy with that." They told us the staff always respected their choices.

We observed staff interact with people in the communal lounge. We saw that people smiled and chatted with staff and were relaxed in their presence. We heard staff talk with people and their tone of voice was friendly, they explained what they were doing and they used words of encouragement when, for example, they assisted people to move around. We saw that people were dressed in clean clothing that they had chosen to wear.

We found Rathgar homely, clean and well maintained throughout. We saw evidence that people's rooms were personalised with their belongings. One person told us, "I like my room. I have my own things. I am comfortable here."

3 June 2011

During a routine inspection

As all the people in the home have dementia, with associated communication problems, we only spoke in some depth with three people. We also spoke with five relatives about their views as to the care provided.

All the people we spoke to were very satisfied with the home's care. Staff are seen as friendly and welcoming. The only suggestion for improving the service was to have more activities.

People praised the service: 'I like it here. We get everything we want'. 'The manager is very conscientious'. 'I don't think there are any rules. I go to bed when I like'. 'I am welcomed here when I visit'. 'The home is kept clean. There are never any smells'. 'Excellent care. Staff are caring and attentive. They encourage independence. I am able to see the care plan and be involved in reviews of it.'