• Care Home
  • Care home

Thorncliffe Grange

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

2 Windmill Lane, Denton, Manchester, Greater Manchester, M34 3RN (0161) 320 0740

Provided and run by:
Partnership Caring Ltd

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 1 December 2020

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

As part of CQC’s response to care homes with outbreaks of coronavirus, we are conducting reviews to ensure that the Infection Prevention and Control practice was safe and the service was compliant with IPC measures. This was a targeted inspection looking at the IPC practices the provider has in place.

This inspection took place on 12 November 2020 and was announced.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 1 December 2020

This inspection took place on 31 October 2018.

Thorncliffe Grange Residential Home is a 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. We regulate both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

Thorncliffe Grange is located in Denton, Manchester. The home provides nursing care and accommodation for up to 50 older people. Bedrooms are situated on the ground floor and first floor of the home. Access between floors is via a passenger lift and staircase. The building is situated in it’s own grounds with gardens and off-road parking. At the time of our inspection 41 people were living at Thorncliffe Grange.

There was a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At our last inspection in November 2014 we rated the service good. At this inspection we found the evidence continued to support the rating of good and there was no evidence or information from our inspection and ongoing monitoring that demonstrated serious risks or concerns. This inspection report is written in a shorter format because our overall rating of the service has not changed since our last inspection.

Staff were aware of their responsibilities to safeguard people from abuse. Safe recruitment practices were in place and the service followed national and local safeguarding guidance.

We found records were written in a positive and respectful way and provided appropriate guidance on how to support people safely.

Staffing levels were high which meant people received prompt support. Risks to people's safety were assessed and medicines were administered safely.

Staff knew people's care needs, preferences, personal histories and backgrounds. People said staff protected their privacy and their dignity was respected. People were supported to be independent.

People said staff treated them with kindness and compassion. Comments included, “This a good place, staff are brilliant" and "[Registered manager] is very caring and know people really well.”

We observed meaningful interactions between staff and people who used the service. People told us staff were kind and caring.

People received care from staff who were appropriately trained to effectively carry out their job roles. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives. The service acted in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act (2005).

People's nutritional needs were met and they were supported to maintain good health and receive ongoing healthcare support.

Thorncliffe Grange had arrangements in place to receive feedback from people that used the service, their relatives, external stakeholders and staff members about the services provided. This information was used to support continuous improvement.

Effective quality assurance audits were in place to monitor the service. The service regularly sought feedback from the people who lived there and their relatives. Staff had regular supervisions and were invited to team meetings.

People and staff thought the registered manager and management team were approachable and supportive.