• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Parklands Care Home

Park Street, Wombwell, Barnsley, South Yorkshire, S73 0HQ 0345 293 7656

Provided and run by:
Mimosa Healthcare (No 4) Limited (In administration)

All Inspections

24 June 2013

During a routine inspection

During our inspection we found people looked clean, tidy and we saw their basic care needs had been met. We talked with four relatives of people who used the service. The relatives explained they were happy with the care given and liked the staff who looked after their family members. Some comments captured included, “highly satisfied” and “very happy with all care, I can’t fault it”.

We found the home had systems and processes in place to ensure the safe administration of medications.

We found people were protected against the risks of unsafe or unsuitable premises.

We found there were effective recruitment and retention processes in place.

We found people had their health and welfare needs met by safe and competent staff.

We found there were effective systems to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that patients receive.

We found there was a complaints process in place.

27 June 2012

During a routine inspection

We used periods of informal observation to see how members of staff interacted with people who use services. Generally, we saw staff treated people with respect by using a well meaning and kind approach. We talked to two people who used the service who said, 'I'm happy [living here]', 'love the food', 'In general get on very well [with staff]' and 'don't think I would have stayed so long if I didn't get everything I need'.

We talked to three relatives of people residing at the home who held some different views about care at the home. Comments captured from two relatives included, 'staff nice and friendly', 'when my [spouse] gets upset the staff handle it well', 'I always find they are clean and had a shave', '[staff] okay always make me a cup of tea when I visit' and, 'find my [spouse] wearing different clothes sometimes (not their own clothes).

11 April 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

People with dementia are not always able to tell us about their experiences, so we used informal observation within the ground floor lounge area to see how members of staff met people who use services assessed needs. We focused our observation on three people with complex needs over a period of one hour. Overall we observed that people's physical and emotional needs were being met. We saw staff treated people with respect along with a well meaning and kind approach. However there were some occasions where staff did not demonstrate they had the necessary skills to communicate with people in an appropriate way.

We were able to talk to three people who use the service during our inspection. We were told 'staff are great', 'It's nice here', 'staff are good', 'I'm alright here'I have no problems', 'I like it here' and 'the staff look after me well'.

15 March 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

People with dementia are not always able to tell us about their experiences, so we used a combination of formal and informal observation on both floors to see how members of staff interacted with people who use services. Generally, we saw most people's needs were being met to varying degrees; we saw staff treated people with respect along with a well meaning and kind approach. On some occasions we observed interaction that showed some staff did not always have the necessary skills to communicate with people in an appropriate way. Some people who use services did not appear to have their personal and hygiene needs being met.

We talked to two relatives of people who use services during our inspection visit. One relative was happy overall with their spouse's care, raised no issues concerning individual staff and stated 'I know [my spouse] safe'. The second relative we talked to explained they were not happy with aspects of their spouses care. They had concerns when they visited that the individual had not had a wash, not been supported to shave and to have their nails and hair cut. The relative told us that communication between them and the staff was not regular or effective. The relative said they would like to see more staff engagement with people who use the service, including families and relatives. They stated 'the care is just not good enough'.

12 December 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This compliance review was undertaken to review improvements of compliance actions that were made at our last compliance review on 2 August 2011. Reviewing those compliance actions did not involve speaking with people who use the service.

2 August 2011

During an inspection in response to concerns

People with dementia are not always able to tell us about their experiences, so we used a formal way to observe people in this inspection to help us understand. We call this the 'Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). This involved us observing five people who used the service for a period of one hour and recording their experiences at regular intervals. This included people's mood, how they interacted with staff members and other people who used services and their environment.

The SOFI observation was conducted within the ground floor lounge area. Throughout the observation we saw all staff treat people with respect along with a well meaning and kind approach. We observed examples of good communication skills by some staff that utilised eye contact and touch to engage with people who used services. For a brief spell we observed one person who used the service become verbally abusive to staff members while they confidently used a hoist to transfer the person from a lounge chair to a wheelchair. The staff members handled the verbal abuse in a calm and appropriate manner. It was a warm day and we observed several examples of care staff encouraging people to drink.

During our SOFI observation we saw that there were sufficient staff numbers on duty, to meet people's needs on the ground floor.

We saw some staff interactions that could have been handled more appropriately by utilising better use of verbal communication. Care staff appeared to more readily focus on people who were more talkative or active, which meant some people who appeared more passive or withdrawn did not receive any or minimal staff interaction during our period of observation. There were minimal structured activities observed. A small number of people were involved in preparing the mixture for scones, but the majority were not involved in any meaningful activity.

We observed care informally on the first floor for a brief period. Two staff members were limited to providing one to one care. On some occasions this meant there appeared to be insufficient staff available to meet people's needs. For example, we observed one occasion where someone needed help and support to go to the toilet and it took a little time for a member of staff to become available. On another occasion a member of staff had to leave one person before combing their hair because another staff member needed assistance. This meant the person waiting for the member of staff to comb their hair became very distressed until the carer returned.