• Doctor
  • GP practice

Village Medical Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

158a, Crankhall Lane, Wednesbury, WS10 0EB (0121) 556 2233

Provided and run by:
Village Medical Centre

Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 23 September 2025 to 26 September 2025. Village Medical Centre is a GP practice and delivers services to 10500 patients under a contract held with NHS England. The practice has a branch surgery called Jubilee Health Centre in Wednesbury. The National General Practice Profiles states that 71.60% of patients are White, 16.22% Asian, 6.03% Black, 3.77% Mixed and 2.11% Other. Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the 1st decile (1 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

SAFE: The service had made improvements since the last assessment; however, we found further strengthening was required to ensure all risks were mitigated. Staff managed the majority of medicines well, but improvements were needed in the management of medicines that required regular monitoring. We found improvements had been implemented in the recruitment of staff to ensure all the appropriate checks had been completed prior to commencing employment. There was a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly and processes were now in place to ensure learning was shared with all the team to mitigate future risks. People were protected and kept safe. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care.

EFFECTIVE: We found the care and treatment of people had improved, with long term condition management strengthened to provide patients with regular reviews. The leadership team had implemented a system which assured the competence of staff employed in advanced clinical practice. People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff involved those important to people and took decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity.

CARING: People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and treatment. The service supported staff wellbeing.

RESPONSIVE: People were involved in decisions about their care. The service provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. Feedback from patients highlighted the difficulties people faced on occasions in getting appointments, this was also reflected in the results of the GP National Patient Survey. The practice had an action plan in place to improve patient satisfaction. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

WELL-LED: Improvements had been made since the last assessment to strengthen governance processes and effective systems were in place to identify, manage and mitigate risks. Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

27 July 2023

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Village Medical Centre on 27 July 2023. The practice also has a branch practice at Jubilee Health Centre, the branch was not visited during the inspection. Overall, the practice is rated as requires improvement.

Safe - requires improvement

Effective - requires improvement

Caring - good

Responsive – requires improvement

Well-led – requires improvement

Why we carried out this inspection

We carried out this inspection in line with our inspection priorities. This was a new registration and the practice had not been inspected previously under this provider.

How we carried out the inspection

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.

This included:

  • Conducting clinical staff interviews using video conferencing.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • A short site visit.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We found that:

  • The practice had a system in place for the actioning of safety alerts, however this needed strengthening to ensure all alerts were acted on in a timely manner to mitigate risk.
  • The management of patients’ medicines required improvements to ensure the appropriate monitoring was in place.
  • The process for reviewing patients with long term conditions needed improvement to ensure all patients received the appropriate reviews.
  • The process for sharing information with the wider practice team needed to be formalised to ensure all staff were included in the sharing of learning outcomes.
  • The practice had increased the number of clinical staff to improve the services provided, however could not demonstrate that patient satisfaction with access had significantly improved.
  • The practice had clear processes in place to ensure safeguarding concerns were acted on promptly that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.

We found breaches of regulations. The provider must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

The provider should:

  • Continue to improve on cancer screening and immunisation targets.
  • Take action to share information with the wider practice team.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Health Care