Archived: Bishopsmead Lodge

Vicarage Road, Bishopsworth, Bristol, BS13 8ES 0345 293 7641

Provided and run by:
Mimosa Healthcare (No 4) Limited (In administration)

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

7, 8, 11 February 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this inspection visit to follow up on improvements we had asked the provider to make following the previous inspection visit on 22 June 2012. The provider sent us an action plan on what they had done to improvements. This Inspection took place to check that the home was now compliant.

During this inspection we identified other areas in which the home was potentially non compliant and added these areas into the inspection. We fed this back to the provider representative at the end of the inspection.

We found that the home did have suitable arrangements in place for gaining consent from people for the use of bedrails in the home. Processes were in place to enable decisions to be made in people's best interests where they were unable to consent.

People’s care plans were not up to date and some people’s care plans did not contain up to date guidance for staff. This meant that people were at risk of receiving inappropriate or unsafe care.

As part of this inspection we raised concerns with the local safeguarding adults team. This was because we were concerned that there were not effective systems in place to ensure that people received enough fluid to remain hydrated.

We also found there were concerns in relation to staffing levels, supervision, induction and pre-employment checks.

The provider agreed that they would not take any further admissions to the home for the time being whilst they addressed the concerns raised at this inspection.

22 June 2012

During a routine inspection

Because of the frailty of individuals living in the home we were only able to speak with a small number of people living in the home. We were able to talk with relatives who were visiting the home at the time of our inspection. However throughout our visit we had an opportunity to observe staff supporting and assisting individuals with their care needs. Through our observation we were also able to see how staff interacted and related to individuals, how they responded to requests for assistance and their response to individuals who may have been distressed. These observations have helped us in making a judgement about the quality of care provided at Bishopsmead Lodge.

People living in the home told us that they were happy with the care provided and that staff; "are all very good, I get the help I need". One person told us; "it is like home here, staff are good I do not have to wait long, they always help me". Another person told us; "I have a choice in what I do, can do as I want" and "I am happy with the care".

We noted some comments in a care file from a doctor who had visited the home they said; "well done to staff for this good care". They had also written to the home saying that; "I was aware of a general calmness and improvements in the standards of care, tidiness and cleanliness of the home". They also praised staff in the "improvements in care" of two individuals living in the home.

The home had received two compliments from relatives which we noted: "we always felt that he and us were treated with the utmost respect care and dignity", and "we were very impressed by the attitude of carers and nursing staff".

We spoke with three relatives who told us how satisfied they were with the care provided in the home. One relative commented that they had noticed; "staff appear to be happier, staff were unsettled but generally seem more settled now, the home feels calmer".

6, 8 December 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

People told us the staff treated them kindly and with respect.

One person told us the staff do not always knock prior to coming into their bedroom.

We observed positive interactions between the staff and the people living in the home.

During our two day visit we did not see any social activities taking place supported by the care staff. Staff told us that the activities tend to be provided on a one to one basis and completed by the activity co-ordinator. Care staff told us that most of the time interactions with people tend to be during the delivery of personal care.

A member of staff anonymously has raised concerns with us about how people are treated in the home including the use of inappropriate language, people not being respected and the lack of dignity and privacy. This is being investigated by the local placing authority and the service. The staff and the people we spoke to during this visit did not raise any concerns with us.

People told us the staff explain what they are doing to assist them and ask their permission to assist them.

We spoke with five people who use the service. They told us that they were happy with the care that they received. One person said 'you just ask for something and they get it'. The people we spoke with said that the care they receive is delivered in a way which promotes their independence.

People we spoke to were aware of the complaints procedure and said they would report to the manager if they were unhappy about the care provided.

A relative said it is not always clear whether the staff member is a member of the care team or a domestic as they wear the same colour uniform. We saw that the care staff and the domestic staff wear the same uniform which could lead to confusion for people receiving a service and their relatives.

People told us that the staff respond promptly to their call bells. One person said 'the staff are alright, some are better than others. They also told us that 'sometimes the home is short staffed and the staff can be busy, but they do their best'.

Care documentation does not always contain current information about how the person should be supported and how decisions have been made on behalf of people.

We observed that people in the home were not supervised or supported at times due to staff being involved in providing personal care. There were limited meaningful activities.

A visiting relative told us that sometimes 'you cannot find a member of staff when you arrive' and that they had waited in the corridor for a period of ten minutes because there were no care staff available.

People cannot be confident that the staff have the necessary training, including a comprehensive induction to support them.

People using the service were aware that there has been changes with the management of the home both visiting relatives and people we spoke to told us the home has had three managers in the last twelve months. People were aware there was a new manager in post and he had been working in the home for three to four weeks.

19 October 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

The purpose of this site visit was a check of compliance with the warning notice that had been issued in July 2011.

We did not speak to any of the people using the service during this visit.

7 September 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

The purpose of this visit was to follow up a warning notice in relation to Regulation 13 issued on 11 July 2011. On this occasion we did not speak to people using the service.

We saw that improvements had been made to the handling of medicines in the home since we issued our warning notice on 11 July 2011. This means that people living in the home are better protected. However we identified some shortfalls that still need to be addressed so the warning notice remains in place.

The purpose of this visit was to follow up a warning notice in relation to Regulation 13 issued on 11 July 2011. On this occasion we did not speak to people using the service.

We saw that improvements had been made to the handling of medicines in the home since we issued our warning notice on 11 July 2011. This means that people living in the home are better protected. However we identified some shortfalls that still need to be addressed so the warning notice remains in place.

3 October 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

The purpose of this visit was to follow up a warning notice in relation to Regulation 10, outcome 16. This had been issued during a responsive review on 15 July 2011.

On this occasion we did not speak to people using the service.

21 June 2011

During an inspection in response to concerns

When we spoke to people who live at Bishopsmead Lodge about the service they received comments we received were mixed. We asked people how they were supported with their personal care. One person told us; 'Staff help me when I need it, sometimes I have to wait but that's ok', this person did not raise any other concerns about their care. Another person said; 'I am looked after, they help me every week with my bath, its no bother to them'.. We asked a third person the same question and they told us; 'Some staff are alright, I try and do things for myself, I don't want to be a nuisance'. No other comments or concerns were raised to us

In respect of how people are supported with their medication on this occasion we did not speak to people about this outcome area.

12 January 2011

During a routine inspection

People living in the home were positive about the care and support they received. They told us they felt there were enough staff who treated them well.

People told us they are able to take part in activities in the home and are supported to go out in the local community and on trips.

People said staff were kind and caring in their approach and staff knew their needs well.

People said they liked living in the home.