• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Shared Lives of Calderdale

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

1 Park Road, Halifax, West Yorkshire, HX1 2TU (01422) 363561

Provided and run by:
Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

28 September 2016

During a routine inspection

This was an announced inspection on the 28 September 2016 and we made calls to people using the service and their relatives on the 04 October 2016. At the time of our inspection there were 43 people using the service.

We last inspected Shared Lives of Calderdale December 2013 and it was compliant in all areas inspected against at that time.

Calderdale Shared Lives Scheme provides a service for people who are vulnerable and need support to live independently in a family setting. The scheme widens the choice of services available to vulnerable people living in the community. Support is provided in three different ways; long term stay, respite care and day services.

The service had a registered manager in place at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons.’ Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about

how the service is run.

People felt safe and they were being protected from harm and abuse by staff and shared lives workers who knew their responsibilities. Risks to people's health and well-being had been assessed to support them to remain safe.

People's individual needs had been considered to keep them safe during an emergency and the provider had a plan in place to make sure that the service would continue in the event of an emergency.

The provider sought to keep people safe by analysing accidents and incidents. They had looked to reduce the number of these whenever possible. For example, where a person's level of support needed to increase due to their mental health, guidance from a social worker had been requested.

People were being supported by staff who had been checked before they had started to work for the provider. This had helped the provider to make safer recruitment decisions. When a member of the public had applied to become a carer, we found there was a thorough process in place to check their suitability.

People received the support they required with their medicines. Staff and carers had received training to support them to handle medicines safely and there was written guidance available to them to provide safe support to people.

People received support from carers and staff who had undertaken training.

Staff and shared lives workers received support and guidance in order to understand their responsibilities. For example, shared lives workers had regular visits from staff members. The registered manager provided staff with regular meetings to support them to carry out their roles effectively.

People's consent to care and treatment had been documented. We found the provider working with the guidelines of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

People were being supported by staff and carers who understood the requirements of the MCA. They were able to describe how they would seek additional support if they had concerns about people's ability to make decisions for themselves.

People chose the food they wanted. Their eating and drinking preferences and needs were known by carers. People were also being supported to remain healthy. Staff and shared lives workers knew how to do this and information about people's health needs was available in their support plans. Where there was concern about people's health, staff and shared lives workers knew what to do and took the appropriate action.

People were supported by shared lives workers who showed kindness and compassion. Their dignity and privacy was being respected and their confidential and sensitive care records were being stored safely.

Shared lives workers and staff knew about people's preferences and what was important to them. People were being supported to be as independent as they wanted.

People or their representatives had been involved and had contributed to the planning and reviewing of their care and support. Where people needed support to be involved, information and access to advocacy services had been made available to them.

People had support plans that were focused on things that were important to them and known by shared lives workers. They received care and support based on this. People were undertaking hobbies and interests that they enjoyed.

People knew how to complain if they had needed to. The provider took action where necessary when they had received a complaint.

Shared lives workers and staff told us that the service was well-led. There were opportunities available to them to give ideas for improvement to the provider.

Shared lives workers and staff told us, and we saw, that they were supported and were clear about their roles and responsibilities. They received regular feedback on their work in order to improve the quality of the care and support offered to people.

There was a registered manager in place who understood the requirements of their role. They had worked with the provider to regularly assess the quality of the service. The registered manager had plans in place to improve the service.

17 December 2013

During a routine inspection

We found the scheme provided good quality family based care to people seeking an alternative to the traditional long term care environments. We spoke with two people who used the service and four carers who provided a placement for people using the scheme. We also visited two carers who provided respite to one person who used the service.

People told us they regarded the carers as friends and thought the service they received was very good. One person said, 'I like to go shopping with my carer and I also like to be independent and go places with my friends.'

We found people were given choices about where they lived and allowed time to visit carer's homes. Consideration was given to people's interests and lifestyle when staff from the scheme explored potential placements.

The scheme provided an effective system to reduce the risk and spread of infection. This included staff receiving training in this subject and the provision of protective clothing where required.

There were effective recruitment and selection processes in place to ensure people were supported by carers that were trained and supported to meet their needs. Carers said they received the support and training they needed and they knew there was always staff they could contact for advice.

Records were kept and disposed of in accordance with the legal requirements. People's personal records including medical records were accurate and fit for purpose.

15 January 2013

During a routine inspection

We saw a survey that had been completed in January 2013 by someone who was using the service. They said "It's a friendly service, people listen and meet my needs. I am treated with respect and carers are very good and always helpful."

We spoke with four carers, the scheme manager and one of the shared lives officers. These are some of the things they told us:

"The support for carers is very good. We get a lot of training and meet regularly as a group. It's a great team and the shared lives staff are very supportive."

"No matter how small the issue is if I need a visit or support the shared lives staff are there."

"The matching of individuals needing support with carers is very good and visits are arranged to suit each person."