• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: The Grange Nursing Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

9 Elm Avenue, Beeston, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG9 6BH (0115) 925 3758

Provided and run by:
Sun Care Homes Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 29 August 2018

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

This inspection took place on 18 June 2018 and was unannounced. The inspection team consisted of one inspector, a nurse specialist advisor and an expert by experience. An expert by experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service. They had experience of a range of care services.

We looked at notifications sent to us by the provider. A notification is information about important events which the provider is required to tell us about by law. Before the inspection, the provider completed a Provider Information Return (PIR) and we took this into account when we made the judgements in this report. The PIR is information we require providers to send us at least once annually to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. As part of our inspection planning, we also contacted the local authority who commission services at The Grange Nursing Home.

We spoke with seven people who used the service and five visiting relatives. We also spoke with three care workers, the clinical lead nurse and the registered manager. Throughout the day we observed care practices, the administration of medicines and general interactions between people who used the service and the staff.

We looked at documentation, including five people’s care and support plans, their health records, risk assessments and daily notes. We also looked at three staff files and records relating to the management of the service. They included audits such as medicine administration and maintenance of the environment, staff rotas, training records and policies and procedures.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 29 August 2018

We inspected The Grange Nursing Home on 18 June 2018. The Grange Nursing Home is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. The service was registered to accommodate up to 29 older people, with age related conditions, including frailty, mobility issues and dementia. On the day of our inspection there were 24 people using the service; 11 had been assessed as requiring nursing care and treatment and 13 residential care and support.

The service was last inspected on 16 February 2016; no concerns were identified and the service was rated ‘Good’ overall.

There was a registered manager in post, who was present on the day of the inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People received care and support from staff that were appropriately trained and competent to meet their individual needs. Staff received one-to-one supervision meetings with their line manager.

People’s needs were assessed and care plans provided staff with clear guidance about how they wanted their individual needs met. Care plans were personalised and contained appropriate risk assessments. They were regularly reviewed and amended as necessary to ensure they reflected people’s changing support needs.

There were policies and procedures in place to guide staff on how to keep people safe from harm and staff showed a good understanding of their responsibilities.

People were supported with patience, consideration and kindness and their privacy and dignity was respected. People were protected from potential discrimination as staff were aware of and responded effectively to their identified needs, choices and preferences. People’s individual communication needs were assessed and they were supported to communicate effectively with staff.

Thorough staff recruitment procedures were followed and appropriate pre-employment checks had been made.

Systems were in place to ensure medicines were managed safely in accordance with current regulations and guidance. People received medicines when they needed them and as prescribed.

The registered manager worked in cooperation with health and social care professionals to ensure people received appropriate healthcare and treatment in a timely manner. People could access health, social and medical care, as required.

The provider was meeting the legal requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People were provided with appropriate food and drink to meet their health needs and were happy with the food they received. People’s nutritional needs were assessed and records were accurately maintained to ensure people were protected from risks associated with eating and drinking. Where risks to people had been identified, these had been appropriately monitored and referrals made to relevant professionals, where necessary.

The provider had systems in place to assess the quality of care provided and make improvements when needed. People knew how to make complaints, and the provider had a process to ensure action was taken where this was needed. People were encouraged and supported to express their views about their care and staff were responsive to their comments and views.