Angle House Goff Oak Specialist Dentistry

Updated 23 July 2025

We carried out this announced off-site inspection on 18 February 2026.

Where we carry out an offsite assessment, we undertake a detailed review of the practice risk assessments, audits, policies, staff records and other relevant documents. We gather feedback from patients, staff and stakeholders (where relevant). We carry out a remote visual assessment of the premises and have discussions with staff.

We found the practice had met regulations.

The practice had effective systems to identify and manage risks, including infection prevention and control.

Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to carry out their roles.

Recruitment procedures reflected current legislation and there was effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.

Staff provided care and treatment in line with current guidance. They treated patients with dignity and respect and ensured access to care, support, and treatment when required.

Angle House Goffs Oak Specialist Dentistry is part of Angle House, a dental group provider. The practice is in Waltham Cross and provides NHS and private orthodontic dental care and oral surgery treatment for adults and children.

There was step-free access to the practice and car parking spaces available, including dedicated parking for disabled people, near the practice.

The practice had 2 treatment rooms. At the time of our inspection, there was a total of 7 staff. We gathered feedback from staff and spoke to a range of staff during our inspection, including 1 dentist, 1 dental nurse, and the practice manager. We also spoke with the organisation’s compliance manager.

Updated 23 July 2025

We reviewed patient feedback from a variety of sources including patient surveys obtained by the practice and online feedback. Patient feedback provided a positive view of the dental team and care provided by the practice.

Patients commented about the ‘excellent care’ they received, the ‘professionalism’ and ‘caring attitude of the dental team.’

Patients commented positively about the standards of cleanliness and the premises.

Patients felt appointments were scheduled within an acceptable timescale for their needs and said they had enough time during their appointment without feeling rushed.

Patients told us they were given clear information to help them make an informed choice about their treatment and any associated costs. They were involved in decisions about their care.

Patients said when they were prescribed medicines, sufficient information was given.

The practice shared patient feedback with the team. We were told this was reviewed and where suggestions had been made, appropriate action would be taken.