• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Manor House Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

80 Huntingdon Road, Upwood, Nr Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, PE26 2QQ (01487) 814333

Provided and run by:
Bupa Care Homes (CFChomes) Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

16 December 2014

During a routine inspection

Manor House Residential and Nursing Home provides accommodation, personal care and nursing care for up to 40 older people including those living with dementia. Accommodation is located over two floors. There were 34 people living in the home when we visited.

This inspection was undertaken on 16 December 2014 and was unannounced, Our previous inspection was undertaken on 30 April 2014, and during this inspection we found that all of the regulations were being met.

The home did not have a registered manager in post. The registered manager left their post in October 2014. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The CQC monitors the operation of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) which applies to care services. We saw that there were policies and procedures in relation to the MCA and DoLS to ensure that people who could not make decisions for themselves were protected. We saw that staff had followed guidance and were knowledgeable about submitting applications to the appropriate agencies. Records viewed showed us that where people lacked the capacity to make decisions they were supported to make decisions that were in their best interests. People were only deprived of their liberty where this was lawful.

There was a process in place to ensure that people’s health care needs were assessed. This helped ensure that care was planned and delivered to meet people’s needs safely and effectively. Staff knew people’s needs well and how to meet these. People were provided with sufficient quantities to eat and drink.

People’s privacy and dignity was respected at all times. Staff were seen to knock on the person’s bedroom door and wait for a response before entering. They also ensured that people’s dignity was protected when they were providing person care. Care records we reviewed showed us that, wherever possible, people were offered a variety of chosen social activities and interests. People told us that the staff were very kind and knock on their door before entering.

The provider had an effective complaints process in place which was accessible to people, relatives and others who used or visited the service.

The provider had a robust recruitment process in place. Staff were only employed within the home after all essential safety checks had been satisfactorily completed.

The provider had effective quality assurance systems in place to identify areas for improvement and appropriate action to address any identified concerns. Audits, completed by the provider and registered manager and subsequent actions taken, helped drive improvements in the home.

30 April 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with several people who lived, or were staying, at the Manor House, and with some relatives. Everyone told us that they were happy with the service now being provided. One person said, 'I honestly can't fault it at all. The atmosphere is happy here, everyone is happy. You can hear the staff: they're so kind and nice to people.' A relative told us, 'Everybody's really kind, exceptionally so.'

There was a very relaxed, homely atmosphere at Manor House, with people getting on well with the staff and enjoying each other's company. Staff treated people with respect and supported them to remain as independent as possible. People had been involved in deciding on the care and support they wanted. Staff had received training about the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and we saw that published guidance had been followed so that people's capacity to make decisions had been assessed and recorded.

Care records were personalised and gave staff clear guidance on the way each person preferred their need to be met. Possible risks to people had been assessed and measures put in place to reduce the risks as far as possible. Medicines were handled well so that people received their medicines safely and as they were prescribed.

Staff had received training in topics relevant to their role and had regular supervision sessions with senior staff or the manager. Staff told us that they felt well supported. People we spoke with knew how to complain if they needed to.

19 September 2012

During a routine inspection

During our inspection of Manor House Residential and Nursing Home on 19 September 2012 we used a number of different methods to help us understand the experience of people using the service, because some of the people using the service had complex needs which meant that they were not able to tell us their experiences. For part of the inspection we used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a specific way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us.

People we spoke with told us the care they received was satisfactory and that their needs were met. Each person was called by their preferred name and people told us that staff respected their privacy and dignity. One person said, 'I get all the respect I would expect'. People said they made choices about how they lived their lives, including what they ate, where they sat and what they did during the day. However, people were not always encouraged to be as independent as possible and people told us that some days there was not a lot to do. During the afternoon we were at the home we saw that people were bored and became restless and argumentative because there were no activities organised, and staff were not engaging with people.

We saw from the records that some people or their family members had agreed the plan of care for the person. However, the provider did not have suitable arrangements in place to make sure that, where people did not have capacity to consent, decisions about their care were made within a legal framework.

People said they felt safe at this home; they liked the staff and had had no reason to complain. One person said, 'I'm happy and content here'. There were enough staff on duty to meet people's basic care needs, but staff were not spending time with people or keeping people occupied. The staff who spoke with us said they liked working at Manor House Residential and Nursing Home.

We asked the acting manager to send us further information, which we received on 21 September 2012.

6 December 2011

During a routine inspection

All of the people who we spoke with during the course of our visit had positive things to say about their experience of living at the home. One person summarised this feedback when they advised us that the staff treated them, "Very well" and that all of their support and care needs were met in the way that they liked.

Another person said that they had confidence in the way that staff supported them with their transfers by means of a hoist. They also said that they felt that their dignity and privacy was respected and valued and that they had a good relationship with the staff which was injected with a sense of mutually respectful humour.

Although people indicated that they were consulted about their care and support needs, they told us that they had never seen their care plans and were not aware that these were available. Following our description of the purpose of the care plan to one person they said, "Oh! It's very important then".

People also told us that they felt safe from any harm and all of them who we spoke with, and able to tell us, said that they liked their rooms.