• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Grafton House Residential Home

Overall: Inadequate read more about inspection ratings

157 Ashby Road, Scunthorpe, Lincolnshire, DN16 2AQ (01724) 289000

Provided and run by:
Saima Raja

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 21 January 2023

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

As part of this inspection we looked at the infection control and prevention measures in place. This was conducted so we can understand the preparedness of the service in preventing or managing an infection outbreak, and to identify good practice we can share with other services.

Inspection team

This inspection was carried out by an inspection manager and two inspectors.

Service and service type

Grafton House Residential Home is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

The registered manager had resigned in April 2021. A new manager had been appointed in April 2021. It is a legal requirement to have a registered manager. A registered manager and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection

The first day of the inspection was unannounced. We told the manager we would be returning on the second, third and fourth days.

What we did before the inspection

We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. We sought feedback from the local authority, professionals who work with the service and attended safeguarding strategy meetings. The provider was not asked to complete a provider information return prior to this inspection. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We took this into account when we inspected the service and made the judgements in this report. We used all information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

We spoke with five people who used the service and two relatives about their experience of the care provided. We spoke with the provider and 15 members of staff including; the manager, quality assurance lead, six care staff, two senior care assistants, two housekeepers, the cook, the maintenance person and the activity coordinator.

We also spoke with eight health and social care professionals who visited the service.

We reviewed multiple people's care files, daily records of care and medication records. We also reviewed three staff personnel files. A variety of records relating to the management of the service, including policies and procedures were reviewed.

We conducted a walk around of the service and spent time observing staffs’ interactions with people as well as staffs’ infection prevention and control practice.

After the inspection

We spoke with a health care professional.

Overall inspection

Inadequate

Updated 21 January 2023

About the service

Grafton House Residential Home is a care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to 24 older people, some of whom may be living with dementia. At the time of our inspection 12 people lived at the service.

People’s experience of using this service

People were not safe. Risks to people were not appropriately managed or recorded. Lessons were not learned when things went wrong.

People were not protected from abuse; not all staff had received training and did not know how to recognise or report abuse. Concerns identified by health professionals in relation to standards of care and moving and handling practices were reported to the local safeguarding team.

There were insufficient numbers of suitably qualified staff on duty and staff were unfamiliar with people’s care and support needs. Staff had not been provided with sufficient training or induction to their role.

Maintenance issues had not been addressed in a timely way. Appropriate standards of hygiene had not been maintained in all areas. Effective infection prevention and control (IPC) measures were not always followed by staff and management. Risks in relation to transmission of infections had not been fully considered and managed. This had placed people at risk of harm.

People did not always receive person-centred care and care records did not fully reflect their needs. There was a lack of meaningful activities for people.

The principles of the Mental Capacity Act were not always followed. People were not supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff did not support them in the least restrictive ways possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service did not support this practice.

People’s nutritional needs were not always met, and mealtimes were disorganised. Although staff worked closely with a range of health and social care professionals, there had been delays in making referrals for health care assessments when some people’s needs changed.

Staff were recruited safely, and medicines were managed safely. People and relatives said they liked the staff and described them as kind and caring. However, there were times when some people’s dignity was compromised.

The service was not well-led. The provider had failed to retain a competent manager. Leadership was poor and ineffective; staff lacked direction and support and were left to their own devices. Many of the staff who knew people well had left; inexperienced staff had been appointed to senior roles and the high use of new staff, who were not familiar with people’s needs, had impacted negatively on the service. The provider’s quality assurance systems were not effective in identifying and addressing issues. The service has a history of not sustaining improvements.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection and update

The last rating for this service was requires improvement (published 26 February 2021).

At this inspection enough improvement had not been made and the provider was in breach of multiple regulations and there were significant concerns. The overall rating for the service has changed from requires improvement to inadequate. This is based on the findings at this inspection.

Why we inspected

The inspection was prompted in part due whistleblowing concerns and the decision taken by North Lincolnshire Council Adult Safeguarding Team to open a whole service enquiry due to the level of concerns raised in relation to IPC, staffing, the quality of care and management of the service. As a result, we undertook a comprehensive inspection to review the key questions of safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to coronavirus and other infection outbreaks effectively.

You can see what action we have asked the provider to take at the end of this full report.

Enforcement

We are mindful of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our regulatory function. This meant we took account of the exceptional circumstances arising as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic when considering what enforcement action was necessary and proportionate to keep people safe as a result of this inspection. We will continue to discharge our regulatory enforcement functions required to keep people safe and to hold providers to account where it is necessary for us to do so.

We have identified breaches in relation to person-centred care, safe care, safeguarding, consent, dignity and respect, nutrition, the environment, staffing numbers and training and good governance.

Full information about CQC’s regulatory response to the more serious concerns found during inspections is added to reports after any representations and appeals have been concluded.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Grafton House Residential Home on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Follow up

We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

Special Measures:

The overall rating for this service is ‘inadequate’ and the service is therefore in ‘special measures’. This means we will keep the service under review and, if we do not propose to cancel the provider’s registration, we will re-inspect within 6 months to check for significant improvements.

If the provider has not made enough improvement within this timeframe. And there is still a rating of inadequate for any key question or overall rating, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures. This will mean we will begin the process of preventing the provider from operating this service. This will usually lead to cancellation of their registration or to varying the conditions the registration.

For adult social care services, the maximum time for being in special measures will usually be no more than 12 months. If the service has demonstrated improvements when we inspect it. And it is no longer rated as inadequate for any of the five key questions it will no longer be in special measures.