• Care Home
  • Care home

Wagstaff Way

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

3 Wagstaff Way, Marston Green, Solihull, West Midlands, B37 7GW (0121) 788 8168

Provided and run by:
Autism.West Midlands

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 13 November 2020

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

This was a targeted inspection looking at the infection control and prevention measures the provider has in place. As part of CQC's response to the coronavirus pandemic we are conducting a thematic review of infection control and prevention measures in care homes.

The service was selected to take part in this thematic review which is seeking to identify examples of good practice in infection prevention and control.

This inspection took place on 02 November 2020 and was announced.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 13 November 2020

About the service

3 Wagstaff Way is registered to provide personal care and accommodation to a maximum of five people. People who live there may have a learning disability and/or autism. At the time of the inspection four people lived at the home.

The service applied the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensured that people who used the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives. People using the service received planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that was appropriate and is inclusive for them.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People felt safe and were supported by staff who knew how to protect them from avoidable harm. Risks to people's health and well-being were known by staff and had been monitored to promote people’s safety. People received their medication as prescribed. Staff were recruited safely and there were enough staff to meet people's needs. The home was visibly clean and observed infection control practices.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives. Staff supported people in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests. The policies and systems in the service supported this practice. The service applied the principles and values of Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These ensure that people who use the service achieve the best possible outcomes including, independence and inclusion. People support focused on them having as many opportunities as possible for them to gain new skills and become more independent. The premises presented as a domestic residence. Staff were not required to wear uniform in accord with the domestic orientation of the home.

New staff received induction training to introduce them to their role and the people they were to support. Training had been received by staff and refreshed in line with the provider's timeframes. People were supported by staff who knew them and their needs well. People were encouraged, where possible, to make decisions about their care. People were supported by staff who understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. People's nutritional needs had been assessed and guidance was provided for staff about how to encourage people to maintain a healthy diet. Referrals were made to healthcare professionals where required to ensure people's health needs were met.

People and relatives felt staff were caring and treated people with dignity and respect. People were encouraged to develop and maintain their independence skills. Visitors were always made to feel welcome. People were supported by staff to maintain contact with their families.

Assessment and reviews of people’s care and support needs were undertaken regularly or as required. People and their relatives were included in these processes to ensure all needs were determined and addressed. Relatives felt comfortable to raise any complaints they had with the staff or registered manager. Relatives confirmed they were always kept up to date with important information relating to their family member.

People, relatives and external social care professional told us the service was well-led and spoke positively of the overall service provided. Provider feedback processes had been used to gather information about the views of people and relatives about the service provision. The registered manager understood their regulatory responsibilities and their requirement to provide us (CQC) with notifications about important events and incidents that occurred whilst the service was delivering care. The provider had quality assurance systems in place and action had been taken to make improvements where they were required.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 12 September 2017).

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.