You are here

Hospice at Home West Cumbria Good

Inspection Summary


Overall summary & rating

Good

Updated 16 December 2015

This inspection of the Hospice at Home West Cumbria took place over three days 18, 19, 20 August 2015. We last inspected this service in January 2014. At that inspection we found the service was meeting all the regulations assessed.

Hospice at Home West Cumbria (the service) is a registered charity providing 24 hour nursing care with personal care interventions as appropriate to need and a lymphoedema assessment and treatment service. The service will also support people living in residential or nursing homes or in the acute hospital and community hospital and operates from an office based at Workington Community Hospital. The service aims to help both people and their carers during the last few months, weeks or days of their lives. The care and support supplements that given by community doctors and nurses.

The Hospice at Home West Cumbria provides a specialist Lymphoedema service through its clinics and home visits. [Lymphoedema is a chronic condition where excess fluid is retained in the tissues causing a painful swelling]. There is also a patient, family and bereavement support service available before and following bereavement. All services are provided free of charge.

At the time of our inspection the service had 12 people using the home nursing service. Six people were being visited at home by the Lymphoedema nursing team as their condition did not allow them to attend the service’s clinics. In addition the service provided Lymphoedema clinics and also made home visits if needed.

The service also offers bereavement support to patients, carers and families (including children as part of the family unit) and complimentary therapies. The complimentary therapies provided included therapeutic massage, Reflexology, Reiki and breathing and relaxation techniques. [Complimentary or ‘holistic’ therapies are therapies that aim to treat the whole person, not just the symptoms of disease].

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Everyone we spoke to whose relatives were or had received care from the service had only positive things to say about their experiences. Comments included, “They are so caring” and “A real community asset” and “So professional”. Staff were proud to be part of the organisation and set themselves high standards to deliver.

We found that the service was well run and had measurable and verifiable processes in place to thoroughly monitor and assess the effectiveness of the care and support services it provided. Systems were also in place to ensure that training and development and research activity were given the time and resources needed to promote the continuous improvement of the service. This approach placed the voices and preferences of the people using the service at its centre. The service also took its expertise out into the broader community through training and educational initiatives. Staff were enthusiastic and showed a deep commitment to providing a high standard of care and expertise.

The staff and management team used reflection and incident analysis to help them make changes to improve the care and support they gave so that they responded quickly to a person’s needs. Forward thinking planning and strategic business planning was very clear and accessible to address the diverse and changing care needs of the local population.

The service worked closely with the hospital palliative care team, GPs, the Macmillan team, community nursing services and external agencies such as social services and mental health team. This helped to make sure smooth cross service working to provide appropriate care to meet people’s different physical, psychological and emotional needs.

There were systems in place to assess and to grade and manage risk. For example, to protect people from the risks associated with medicines, falls, pressure sores and moving and handling. For staff the lone worker procedures and risk assessments for work place stress and specific training needs helped keep staff safe as well.

People who used the services told us how much they valued it and the high standard of caring and understanding displayed by staff about their needs. They told us that they were involved in planning how they wanted to be cared for and were frequently asked for their views and experiences of the service and were listened to. A relative told us “They give us all the care and support they possibly can, they’re so very good”.

Everyone we spoke with who worked for the service was very clear about their aims and objectives and their sense of commitment to the people they supported was evident in their enthusiasm and pride in their service.

All staff and volunteers received induction, training and support relevant to their roles and had been tailored to their personal training needs. Training was given a high priority and staff were encouraged to realise their potential and develop their skills and knowledge to take the service forward and provide care that reflected best practice.

Staff had received training on safeguarding and all felt they could raise and concerns about safety or practice with the management team and would be well supported. Effective systems were in place for the recruitment of staff and there were regular registration and security checks to make sure all staff were still suitable to work with people in their homes.

Inspection areas

Safe

Good

Updated 16 December 2015

The service was safe.

Staff understood their responsibility to safeguard people and what action to take if they were concerned about a person’s safety or wellbeing.

Risks had been appropriately assessed as part of the care planning process and staff had clear information on the management of identified risks.

Medicines were handled safely and people received their medicines appropriately.

Staff had been recruited safely with appropriate pre-employment checks.

Effective

Good

Updated 16 December 2015

The service was effective.

The Hospice at Home staff worked closely and collaboratively with hospital, community organisations and health and social care professionals to help ensure people received the right care at the right time.

Staff at all levels received induction and on going personal support and training suited to their roles and responsibilities to help ensure they could meet the individual needs of the people they supported.

Staff understood the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. People were supported to make their own decisions about care and treatment.

Caring

Good

Updated 16 December 2015

The service was caring.

People who used the service received dignified end of life care in line with their expressed wishes. They had received support  from well trained and committed nursing and care staff.

Hospice at home staff demonstrated good knowledge about the people they were supporting, their conditions and the importance of holistic care at the end of life.

Information was easily available about the services being provided and also on how to access advocacy and other support services for people who needed this

Responsive

Good

Updated 16 December 2015

The service was responsive.

The service planned ahead and reflected upon events to ensure a person centred approach to meeting people’s care and treatment choices and needs.

There were effective and clear information channels and communication systems and processes for people to complain if they wished to. Collaborative working between services promoted the continuity of care for people.

People’s care need needs were kept under frequent review and the staff and management had responded quickly when people’s needs changed.

Well-led

Good

Updated 16 December 2015

The service was well led.

The management team and staff worked in partnership with key organisations to participate in multi-disciplinary processes and research and development to develop, inform and agree best care practice for people’s end of life care.

There were clear and effective governance and management strategies that involved people using the service, their carers and other stakeholders in service development and continuous improvement.

A proactive approach had been taken to research and development to continuously improve service provision, staff development and to add to the body of knowledge to progress palliative care.