• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: 16 Hill Park Road Residential Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

16 Hill Park Road, Highweek, Newton Abbot, Devon, TQ12 1NU (01626) 337710

Provided and run by:
Mrs Sarah Louise Vooght

All Inspections

3 February 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 3 February 2015 and was announced. The provider was given 24 hours’ notice because the location was a small care home for people who are often out during the day; we needed to be sure that someone would be in.

16 Hill Park Road provides care and accommodation for one person. On the day of the inspection one person lived in the home. 16 Hill Park Road can provide care for people who have learning disabilities and may also have with mental health conditions, sensory impairment and/or have restricted mobility.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People and staff were relaxed, kind and caring interactions took place. The environment was clean and people were well cared for. A friend said; “[…] is cared for by kind considerate staff” and “It’s a lovely home, always clean, a pleasure to visit.”

Care records contained in-depth information that described what staff needed to do to provide personalised care and support. Staff responded quickly to people’s change in needs. Where appropriate friends, relatives and health and social care professionals were involved in identifying people’s needs. People preferences, life histories, disabilities and abilities were taken into account, communicated and recorded.

People’s risks were managed well and monitored. Policies and procedures were in place and understood by staff to help protect people and keep them safe.

People were promoted to live full and active lives and were supported to go out and use local services and facilities. Activities were meaningful and reflected people’s interests and individual hobbies. A relative commented that staff took action to ensure people were not socially isolated.

People were supported to maintain a healthy balanced diet. Dietary and nutritional specialists’ advice was sought so that people with complex needs in their eating and drinking were supported effectively.

People had their medicines managed safely and received their medicines as prescribed. People were supported to maintain good health through regular access to health and social care professionals, such as GPs, occupational therapists and social workers.

People, friends, relatives and staff were encouraged to be involved and help drive continuous improvements. This helped ensure positive progress was made in the delivery of care and support provided by the service.

The service sought feedback form people and encouraged people to share their concerns and complaints. The registered manager confirmed that, whilst they had never received any form of complaint, if they did, they would investigate the matter thoroughly and use the outcome as an opportunity for learning to take place.

People were kept safe and protected from discrimination. All staff had undertaken training on safeguarding adults from abuse and equality and diversity. Staff displayed good knowledge on how to report any concerns and described what action they would take to protect people against harm. Professionals and appropriate legal representatives had been used where best interests decisions had been made. This helped to ensure people’s rights were protected.

There were sufficient staff to meet people’s needs. Staff were appropriately trained and had the correct skills to carry out their roles effectively. One staff member said: “We get all the training we need”. The service followed safe recruitment practices to help ensure staff were suitable to work with vulnerable adults. Staff described the management as very open, supportive and approachable. Staff talked positively about their jobs.

There were effective quality assurance systems in place. Incidents were appropriately recorded and analysed. Learning from incidents were used to help drive improvements and ensure positive progress was made in the delivery of care and support provided by the service.

27 January 2014

During a routine inspection

We spoke with the registered manager for both services and two staff members. We met people who were receiving services and spoke with their families.

Family members told us they were very happy with the care their relative was receiving from the service. One person told us 'I can't visit as often as I would like but I am certain that my relative is being well cared for'.

We saw that people had specific and individualistic care plans. These had been updated daily in accordance with people's continuing care needs and wishes. Staff had all received a thorough core training programme that included safeguarding and attended regular updates.

There were sufficient staff to meet people's needs and appropriate background checks had been completed on all staff. Audits were in place to continually monitor and assess the quality of care and support provided.

21 September 2012

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with were positive about the care they received at the care home and the domiciliary care agency. Where people were unable to express their views clearly we saw that they appeared relaxed in the company of staff.

People we spoke with liked the staff who cared for them. One person said 'They (the staff) are nice.' We saw that there had been employment checks performed on staff. Comprehensive training and supervision programmes were in place to show that staff had the support and skills to care for vulnerable people.

Relatives and representatives were also happy with the service provided. One representative had written 'X has a lovely home. They are lucky in all aspects of their care.' Another comment read 'They (the staff) provide an excellent service.'

People were able to make choices about their lifestyle. We found that people's physical and mental health care needs were assessed well. Care was delivered in a way that helped to ensure their safety, independence, welfare and wellbeing. The staff who worked at the care home and domiciliary agency had a good knowledge of what people's needs were and how to meet those needs.

People knew how to complain and were able to share their views. Where people were unable to express their views, concerns or opinions the provider had organised the services of an advocate to enable people to share their concerns and views.

The provider had systems in place to formally and informally monitor the service.

1, 31 January 2011

During a routine inspection

Feedback from the person living in the care home and the care manager were positive in all aspects. We have not included detail in this report to protect the identity and confidentiality of the person.

Feedback from people receiving a service from the Saraton Domiciliary care service was also very positive. Feedback from friends, family and care managers were positive including: 'it is reassuring to have a service like this' and 'they go above and beyond what we expect' Further comments can be found in the report.