• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

TheSignLife Project

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

7 Vine Terrace, High Street, Harborne, Birmingham, B17 9PU 07555 676913

Provided and run by:
TheSignLife Project CIC

Important:

We served four warning notices on TheSignLife Project CIC on 18 August 2025 for failing to meet the regulations related to staffing, good governance, safe care and treatment and person-centred care at TheSignLife Project.

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Requires improvement

Updated 16 June 2025

Date of assessment: 16 June to 25 July 2025. TheSignLife Project is a homecare service providing support to people living in their own homes who are profoundly deaf or deafblind. At the time of our inspection the service was providing support to 14 adults. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive a regulated activity of personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of the inspection, 3 people were in receipt of regulated activity.

This was the first inspection for this provider and we have assessed the service against all the quality statements in the key questions of safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led.

The service supports some autistic people and people with a learning disability. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Overall, we found that care planning and risk assessments lacked sufficient detail and were not person-centred. Financial safeguarding processes were unclear and undocumented and medication management was inconsistent, with gaps in staff training, and competency checks. Governance systems were not effective. Incident and safeguarding records were incomplete, and there was limited evidence of learning from events. Recruitment practices were not robust, with gaps in employment and effort only being made to obtain one reference. Staff training was not consistently monitored, and records showed gaps in key areas such as mental health and learning disability awareness. Oversight mechanisms, including spot checks and management meetings, were either undocumented or lacked structure.

However, the provider and staff demonstrated a clear commitment to the people they support. Staff knew individuals well and were passionate about delivering compassionate care. Communication support was tailored to people’s needs, and staff were proactive in accompanying individuals to appointments and advocating on their behalf.

The provider responded positively to feedback during the inspection and began taking steps to address identified concerns, including improvements to care planning, governance processes and documentation.

The provider was in breach of the legal regulations relating to person-centred care, safe care and treatment, good governance and staffing. In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.

People's experience of the service

Updated 16 June 2025

Feedback from people and their loved ones was generally positive. People told us they felt safe and supported, and that staff encouraged them to make healthier choices. One person shared that they felt more at ease when supported by staff, especially when navigating public transport. Relatives spoke positively about the registered manager and the staff team, describing them as caring, kind, and respectful. They felt confident that any concerns would be listened to and acted upon. Relatives also told us staff arrived on time, communicated well, and were open and transparent about any issues. Staff supported people to attend appointments and facilitated communication for those who needed it. People with a learning disability were supported to learn new skills and engage in community activities, such as going to the gym and attending college. This contributed positively to their quality of life.