You are here

Active Social Care Limited (Kirklees, Calderdale and Bradford) Outstanding

Inspection Summary

Overall summary & rating


Updated 27 June 2018

This inspection took place onsite 23 and 25 April 2018 and was announced. We also spoke with relatives and professionals up to 14 May 2018. The service had been inspected previously on 4 and 5 October 2016 and was found to be in breach of a regulation. The registered provider had immediately resolved this matter and implemented systems to ensure this did not happen again.

This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes with physical disabilities, learning disabilities, and behaviours that challenge, especially autism. This service also provides care and support to people living in a ‘supported living’ setting, so that they can live in their own home as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support.

Not everyone using Active Social Care Limited receives a regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of the inspection the service supported 104 adults and 84 children. 19 adults and four children required support with ‘personal care’. Five people were provided with care and support in a ‘supported living’ setting.

There was a well-established registered manager in post who was also the director of the company. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People and their relatives told us they felt completely safe and comfortable with staff who visited their home. Robust policies and procedures were in place to assist staff to safeguard people from harm and abuse and the staff we spoke with understood their responsibilities with regards to protecting people.

Risk assessments were extremely detailed to ensure staff supported people to remain safe. These were frequently reviewed and updated as people's needs changed. Staff were confident about how to react and what actions they would take in an emergency situation. Behavioural support plans were exceptional in their detail, ensuring restrictions were kept to a minimum and the risks around behaviours which challenged could be managed. The service recognised the risks around using medicines to manage behaviours that challenged and were actively seeking measures to minimise this. Systems were in place to manage medicines administered in people's own homes and audits were undertaken regularly to ensure staff were meeting the required standard of practice.

Staff had an excellent working knowledge of the key requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. All staff demonstrated a commitment to promoting the rights and choices of people who used the service and ensured people's human and legal rights were respected. Feedback from professionals confirmed staff at the service excelled in their understanding of the Act, and were truly committed to the purpose of the legislation to protect people’s rights and freedoms. Decision specific assessments were in place and staff encouraged people to be involved in decisions about them in their best interests.

Values based recruitment practices ensured staff with the right skills were employed. There was a proactive support and appraisal system for staff, which recognised that continuous development of skills, competence and knowledge was integral to ensuring high quality care and support. Staff were supported through individual supervision. Unannounced observational checks of staff performance were carried out at regular interv

Inspection areas



Updated 27 June 2018

The service was safe

Risks to people's health and wellbeing had been assessed and reduced with detailed plans in place. Behavioural management plans to reduce the risks around behaviours that challenged others were exceptional in detail.

Systems were in place to analyse and understand when something went wrong such as an accident or incident which enabled them to put in measures to learn and improve.

Staff were recruited safely through the use of robust recruitment processes. They used a values based approach to recruitment to ensure they employed people with the right behaviours to support very vulnerable people.



Updated 27 June 2018

The service was exceptionally effective.

Very detailed assessments of people's needs were undertaken in partnership with people, relatives and professionals to tailor people's care packages to meet their needs.

The registered provider worked according to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and had a real understanding on the purpose behind the legislation to protect people�s rights and keep them safe from harm without over restricting their freedoms.

People were supported to eat healthily and care staff were innovative in their approach to encouraging people whose usual diet was limited to choose and prepare more healthy options.



Updated 27 June 2018

The service was caring.

People were supported by a dedicated and caring team of staff who provided exceptional support which enabled people to develop and meet their own goals and wishes. They had been trained to use a variety of innovative techniques to communicate effectively with people to support them to make choices.

Staff spoke very positively about the people they supported and were passionate about supporting people to be independent with personal activities of daily living and into work opportunities.

Staff recognised people�s rights to privacy and to be treated confidentially and with dignity and ensured they protected people�s human rights.



Updated 27 June 2018

The service was extremely responsive

People had very person-centred plans that were developed with their full involvement or that of their relatives. These described in detail how people's needs should be met and were recorded in a way that provided detailed guidance to ensure care was provided in line with the person�s wishes.

Staff and managers encouraged people and their relatives to make complaints and used this as an opportunity to improve their service. The provider investigated and responded to complaints in a robust manner and to the satisfaction of the complainant



Updated 27 June 2018

The service was exceptionally well- led.

The registered provider went above and beyond in sharing a clear vision of the service with staff, people, and relatives and in seeking their participation in operating the service.

There was very strong leadership at all levels. The management team was actively involved in all aspects of the service and was dedicated to providing the best service to those in their service and to support and share knowledge with other providers in the area.

There was an exceptionally robust quality assurance framework in place. Care delivery was always of a high standard as was the management of the service and record keeping.