• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Nottingham Supported Living (DCA)

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

19 Stoney Street, The Lace Market, Nottingham, NG1 1LP 07583 090094

Provided and run by:
Voyage 1 Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 11 May 2022

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people

respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. 'Right support, right care, right culture' is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

About the service

Nottingham Supported Living (DCA) supports people to live in the community. At the time of the inspection 26 people were receiving support. The support varied from a few hours to 24 hours a day. People either lived alone in their tenancy or lived in supported living accommodation in and around Nottinghamshire. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Right Support

Staff supported people to have maximum possible choice, control and independence. Staff encouraged people to have control over their lives. People were supported by staff to pursue their hobbies and interests. People had their aspirations and goals documented in their care plans and staff encouraged and supported them to achieve the goals.

People had tailored Positive Behaviour Support Plans (PBSP) in place. PBSP provided the carers with a step-by-step guide to making sure the people had a good quality of life and identify when they need to intervene to prevent or reduce the likelihood of an episode of distressed behaviour. The staff had training and support in place to help them understand and support people when they were distressed. Staff followed best practice and guidance to avoid the use of unnecessary restraint.

People had a choice about their living environment and were able to personalise their homes. Staff

supported people to take part in activities and pursue their interests in their local area. Staff supported people to make decisions based on their own abilities. Staff communicated with people in ways that met their needs.

Right Care

People received kind and compassionate care. Staff protected and respected people’s privacy and

dignity. They understood and responded to their individual needs. The service had enough appropriately skilled staff to meet people’s needs and keep them safe.

People’s care, treatment and support plans reflected their range of needs and this promoted their

wellbeing and enjoyment of life. People could communicate with staff and understand information

given to them because staff supported them consistently and understood their individual communication needs.

People received care that supported their needs and aspirations, which focused on their quality of life, and followed best practice. The service gave people opportunities to try new activities that enhanced and enriched their lives.

Right Culture

People led inclusive and empowered lives because of the ethos, values, attitudes and behaviours of the management and staff. People received good quality care, support and treatment because trained staff and specialists could meet their needs and wishes.

Staff knew and understood people well and were responsive, supporting their aspirations to live a

quality life of their choosing. People and those important to them, were involved in planning their care. Staff ensured risks of a closed culture were minimised so that people received support based on transparency, respect and inclusivity.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection and update

The last rating for this service was Inadequate (published 14 August 2021) and there were breaches of regulations. The provider completed an action plan after the last inspection to show what they would do and by when to improve. At this inspec

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 11 May 2022

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

Inspection team

Two inspectors carried out the inspection and an Expert by Experience made telephone calls to relatives to seek their feedback on care provided to people using the service. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

Service and service type

This service provides care and support to people living in 11 ‘supported living’ settings so they can live as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support.

Registered Manager

This service is required to have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

At the time of our inspection there was a registered manager in post.

Notice of inspection

We gave the service 24 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because it is an office based service and we needed to be sure the provider or registered manager would be in the office to support the inspection.

What we did before the inspection

Before our inspection, we reviewed our information we held about the service. This included information received from the local authority and professionals who work with the service. We looked at statutory notifications. A statutory notification is information about important events, which the provider is required to send us by law, such as allegations of abuse and serious injuries. We reviewed the last inspection report.

We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return (PIR). This is information providers are required to send us annually with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make.

During the inspection

During the inspection we spoke with four people who used the service and nine relatives of people who used the service. We spoke with the registered manager, operations manager and we received feedback from eight support staff. We also received feedback from external health and social care professionals.

We reviewed a range of records, this included in part, seven people's care records. We looked at two staff files in relation to recruitment, and a variety of records relating to the management of the service, including incident records and analysis, meeting records, staff rota's, complaints and the provider's quality assurance feedback.

After the inspection

We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. This included but was not limited to the provider's current action plan, training data, policies and procedures.