• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Ashcroft Nursing Home - Chesterfield

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

18 Lee Road, Hady, Chesterfield, Derbyshire, S41 0BT (01246) 204956

Provided and run by:
Tamaris Healthcare (England) Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

4 December 2014

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 4 December 2014 and was unannounced.

Accommodation and personal care, is provided at this Ashcroft Nursing Home for up to 42 older adults with dementia care needs. At our visit, 37 people were living in the home. There was a registered manager at this service. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons.’ Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At our last inspection of this service in March 2014, we found that the provider did not always have appropriate arrangements in place for dealing with emergencies and obtaining people’s consent to their care. These were breaches of Regulations 18 and 9 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010. The provider told us about the action they were taking to address this and at this inspection we found that the required improvements had been made.

At this inspection people’s relatives, staff and a visiting health professional were confident that people received safe and appropriate care and were all confident to raise concerns about this if they needed to. People’s care, safety and dependency needs were regularly checked to inform staff planning and deployment. Emergency and staff recruitment procedures were robust.

Staff understood and followed the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to obtain people’s consent or appropriate authorisation for their care. People were safely supported by staff who received the training and supervision they needed to provide people’s care. Potential or known risks to people’s safety were identified before they received care and were regularly reviewed. People’s medicines were safely managed and action was taken to mitigate any identified risks to people’s safety from their health needs through robust care planning.

Staff consulted with external health professionals and followed their advice for people’s health needs when required. People were safely supported to eat and drink and they received adequate nutrition. People’s health and nutritional status was regularly checked. There were plans to review the use of aids and equipment to optimise people’s independence at mealtimes. Staff received the information, training and supervision they needed to perform their roles and responsibilities. Improvements were being made to develop and tailor people’s dementia care through staff training.

Staff, were caring and compassionate. They responded promptly when people needed their assistance and they treated people with respect and maintained their dignity, privacy and independence. People and their relatives were all appreciative of and appropriately involved and informed in the care provided, which met with people’s individual needs and wishes.

People and their representatives knew how to raise any concerns or complaints about the care provided and were confident that these would be listened to and acted on. Findings from these were used to improve people’s experience of their care and daily living arrangements when required.

Staff supported people to interact and engage with others and to participate in social, occupational and recreational activities. This was being done in a way that met with recognised practice concerned with dementia care. Staff, were motivated to deliver people’s care in this way because it helped to inform their understanding of people’s dementia care experience and related care needs.

The home was well managed. People, relatives and staff, were all very positive about the management of the home and the on-going improvements made to people’s care during the previous six months. The quality and safety of people’s care, was regularly checked and the findings were acted on when required. Records were robust and safely stored. The provider had notified us when important events occurred in the service when required.

Staff understood their roles and responsibilities and they were regularly asked for their views about people’s care. They knew how to raise any concerns about this and communicate changes about people’s needs when required.

6, 7 March 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We previously visited Ashcroft Nursing Home on 1 October 2013, 3 December 2013 and 14 January. At our inspection on 1 October 2013 we found non-compliance with the Regulations from the Health and Social Care act 2008). The provider sent us an action plan which identified that compliance would be achieved by the end of February 2014. Our latest inspection visit was to check that the provider had achieved compliance.

Most people who lived at Ashcroft Nursing Home had dementia, and were unable to express their views. Therefore we carried out a Short Observational Framework for Inspection (a SOFI). A SOFI involved a structured observation of people's care and enabled us to gather evidence of people's experiences of receiving care, and get a sense of what it was like to live at the care home.

During this inspection visit we were able to see that there had been several improvements. The environment had been improved with new chairs, carpets and fixtures and fittings, and some redecoration. There was more structure, particularly in respect of the management of the home, with greater support for staff. Our observations of care being given to people showed a greater level of involvement and interaction between staff and people living at the home.

A new activity coordinator had been appointed and we saw that there were now structured and organised activities taking place which were appropriate for the people living at the home.

We found record keeping in relation to care had improved, although some records still needed attention.

A pharmacy inspection manager formed part of the inspection team, and we saw that there were improvements in the management of medicines since our last visit. The improvements had resulted in the warning notice we issued after our 1 October 2013 inspection being withdrawn.

At the time of our inspection the provider did not have a registered manager in post.

14 January 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

When we visited Ashcroft Nursing Home in October 2013, we were so concerned with the quality of care that we served a warning notice. We returned to check compliance in December 2013, and although we found improvements the provider was still not meeting the essential standard.

The purpose of this visit was to check the provider was now meeting the required standard for care and welfare.

On the day of our visit to Ashcroft Nursing Home there were 28 people living there, all of whom were receiving nursing care. We found that there had been some improvements. Our observations of staff interacting with people who lived at the care home showed people being treated with care and consideration. We saw that there were more activities taking place for people living at the home; however an activity coordinator to lead those activities had still not come into post. This meant that activities were still limited. We saw that there had been improvements in the care plans, with better recording of information and care plans being reviewed. We also saw that important information related to people's health was being captured and health care professionals were being involved in people's care.

The staff shift pattern had also been altered to facilitate better care and an improvement in how people's needs were met.

At the time of our inspection the provider did not have a registered manager in post.

3, 4 December 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

On the day of our visit to Ashcroft Nursing Home there were 30 people living there receiving nursing care.

We previously visited Ashcroft Nursing Home on 1 October 2013, and found the provider was not meeting the required standards in respect of care and welfare and the management of medicines. This inspection visit was to check what action the provider had taken to achieve compliance with the regulations and meet the required essential standards of quality and safety. .

Most people who lived at Ashcroft Nursing Home had dementia, and were unable to express their views. Therefore we carried out a Short Observational Framework for Inspection (a SOFI). This involved a structured observation and enabled us to gather evidence of people's experiences of receiving care.

We saw that there was some improvement in the interaction between the staff and the people living at the home. However, we saw that there were limited organised activities and people's dementia needs were still not being met.

We found record keeping in relation to care remained poor, with inconsistent and inaccurate information in several care files.

We saw that medication was not managed in a safe or consistent manner, so that people did not always get their medicines when they needed them and in a suitable way.

At the time of our inspection the provider did not have a registered manager in post.

1 October 2013

During a routine inspection

On the day of our site visit to Ashcroft Nursing Home there were 34 people living there, all in receipt of nursing care.

Most people had dementia, and were unable to express their views. Therefore we carried out a Short Observational Framework for Inspection (a SOFI). This involved a structured observation and enabled us to gather evidence of people's experiences of receiving care. This was particularly so for people who may not have been able to express this for themselves.

We saw that there were no organised activities taking place and there was limited interaction between the staff and the people living at the home. We saw little evidence of staff being skilled or experienced in working with people who had dementia, and little evidence of care being delivered in a way to meet people's needs.

We found that record keeping in relation to care was poor, with inconsistent and inaccurate information in several care files. This had a negative effect on the delivery of care.

We found that staff numbers had fallen below planned levels. So, there were not always enough staff with the right skills and experience to meet people's needs.

We had a specialist pharmacy inspector as part of our inspection team, and we saw that medication was not managed in a safe or consistent manner, which meant that people were at significant risk in respect of medicines management.

At the time of our inspection the provider did not have a registered manager in post.

7 August 2012

During a routine inspection

There were 36 people using the service at the time of our inspection visit. Ashcroft Nursing Home provides a specialist service for people with dementia and as such it was not possible for us to have meaningful discussions with people about their experiences or views of the service.

As it was not possible to speak with people using the service, we used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a specific way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us.

We observed that people had positive interactions with staff. Staff asked people for their views and gave people enough time to answer, for example when asking them what they wanted for lunch or to drink. We saw that people smiled and responded positively to staff when they approached them.

We also spoke with the relatives of three people using the service at Ashcroft Nursing Home. They told us 'the staff are brilliant, they make you welcome' and 'my (relative) is very happy there'.