• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Crossways Residential Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Station Road, Lostock Gralam, Northwich, Cheshire, CW9 7PN (01606) 45559

Provided and run by:
Belong Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

11 April 2016

During a routine inspection

We inspected this service on 11 and 12 April 2016 and the visit was unannounced on the first day.

This care service is owned by CLS Care Services Limited. They are registered to provide personal and respite care for up to 39 adults. A passenger lift and staircases provide access to all levels. The home is purpose built and situated in the village of Lostock Gralam, about three miles from Northwich town centre. Parking is available to the side of the building.

At the time of this inspection visit there were 31 people living at Crossways. They were supported by a staff team of 36.

There was a registered manager employed to work at the service and they have been registered for 10 months. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us that they felt safe at the home with the staff. Appropriate safeguarding policies and procedures were in place and staff told us they would raise any concerns they had with the management team.

People said the staff were kind, friendly and respectful towards them. Relatives said that the home was well run by the new registered manager and that significant improvements had been made since his employment. Staff said the registered manager was very supportive and good improvements had been made since his arrival.

Robust recruitment processes were in place and people could be confident that checks had been undertaken to ensure staff were suitable to work with vulnerable adults. Staff had undertaken a range of training suitable to their role and had met with their line manager for supervision and annual appraisals to discuss their work and training needs. Staff told us that they also had the opportunity to attend relevant meetings.

People told us the food was good and that they had plenty of choice. Other comments included “The food is hot and tasty”. We saw that mealtimes were a pleasant and enjoyable experience and one where people enjoyed their meals.

There were enough staff working to meet the needs of people. People said that staff were available when they needed them. We noted that an activities coordinator was employed at the service.

We looked at how complaints were dealt with. People told us they would approach the staff on duty or the management team if they had any concerns. The registered provider had not received any complaints since the last inspection, however, processes were in place should a complaint be raised and these showed they would be dealt with in a timely manner.

People told us that Crossways was clean and hygienic and on a tour of the building we saw that staff worked hard to ensure that the home’s cleanliness was maintained.

A range of audits were completed as part of the quality assurance processes used within the service. This meant that there were systems in place to ensure that all areas of the service are regularly monitored.

People and their relatives told us that they were asked on a regular informal basis if they were happy with the care and service provided. Annual surveys, care plan reviews and meetings were held on a regular basis. This meant that people had the opportunity to discuss any issues and help inform future planning at the service. People who took part in the survey were happy living at Crossways and were satisfied with the overall standard of the home.

16th April 2015

During a routine inspection

We visited this service on 16th April 2015 and the inspection was unannounced.

The last inspection was carried out in May 2013 and we found that the home was meeting the regulations we assessed.

Crossways is a care home providing personal and respite care for up to 39 older people. A passenger lift and staircases provide access to all levels. The home was purpose built and is situated in the village of Lostock Gralam which is about three miles from Northwich town centre.

At the time of our visit there were 30 people living at the home.

There was a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us that they felt safe at the service and that the staff understood their care needs. People commented “The staff are lovely” and “You’re quite safe here.” However we found that people did not feel able to openly express their opinions about the service.

We found the provider had systems in place to ensure that people were protected from the risk of potential harm or abuse. However we identified that the registered manager had not followed these procedures in one incidence. This meant that people who lived at the service could have been put at risk of potential harm or abuse.

Policies and procedures related to safeguarding adults from abuse were available to the staff team. Staff had received training in safeguarding adults and during discussions said they would report any suspected allegations of abuse to the person in charge. This meant that staff had documents available to them to help them understand the risk of potential harm or abuse of people who lived at the service.

The provider had policies and procedures in place to guide staff in relation to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), safeguarding and staff recruitment.

People where possible were involved in decisions about their care and support. Staff made appropriate referrals to other professionals and community services, such as the GP, where it had been identified that there were changes in someone’s health needs. We saw that the staff team understood people’s care and support needs, and the staff we observed were kind and treated them with respect.

We found the home was clean, hygienic and well maintained in all areas seen.

We looked at the care records of three people who lived at the home. We found there was basic information about the support people required and that it was written in a way that recognised people’s needs. We saw that care plan reviews were completed and up to date.

We identified concerns with the records and administration of medication, which meant that people who used the service may not get their medication administered as prescribed. We have made a recommendation regarding medication.

We found that good recruitment practices were in place and that pre-employment checks were completed prior to a new member of staff working at the service. This meant that the people who lived at the service could be confident that they were protected from staff who were known to be unsuitable.

We looked at staff training and we identified concerns that some staff had not undertaken training that was required by the provider within the timescales set by them. We saw that 11 out of 33 staff had one or more outstanding training sessions not completed. There was a system in place for this but the registered manager had not ensured that training was kept up to date. This meant that some staff training was out of date. Staff did not have up to date supervision or appraisals.

We looked at staffing levels at the service. We saw that the staffing levels had been reduced in line with the current numbers of people who used the service. The manager explained that the staffing levels were set by the registered provider. People who lived at the service felt there were not enough staff on duty and staff said that they felt there time was taken up with task-led activities and little time for social contact or stimulation.

We noted that an activities coordinator was employed at the service. However, they confirmed that often they were asked to undertake caring duties or escorting people to appointments rather than activities that had been planned for that day. This meant that often activities were planned but not completed.

We looked at how complaints were dealt with. Some of the people told us they would approach the management, however others said they were hesitant of speaking out and indicated that there could be repercussions. This led us to believe that with some people who used the service there appeared to be a culture of silence. The service had received two complaints since the last inspection. We saw the documentation relating to these and found the procedure used followed the information within the complaints policy.

We saw that the service had a range of quality assurance systems in place and we noted these were up to date.

People told us the food was okay. We observed that people waited a long time to be served meals.

We found breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

13 May 2013

During a routine inspection

We looked at three care records and four staff files. We also examined a range of policies and procedures. We spoke with people who lived at Crossways, relatives, staff, the manager and a visiting professional.

People who lived in the home said the staff were very kind and "I am well cared for by the staff."

The care records showed that assessments of people's health and social needs had been completed. There was evidence within them to show that care had been evaluated on a regular basis. This meant that the service could demonstrate they could meet people's needs and maintain their health and well being.

The expert by experience spoke to 12 people who lived at Crossways, six relatives and several staff together with general observation over a four hour period. They observed people who lived in the home being treated in a dignified manner and with good responses to requests.

The inspector observed the breakfast and people confirmed that they were very happy with the food and they had their preferred choice for breakfast. One person commented 'You can have a cooked breakfast if you want.'

We noted that people who used the service were protected from the risk of abuse, because the provider had taken reasonable steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent abuse from happening.

5 February 2013

During a routine inspection

We found that people were able to express their views and were involved in making decision about their care and support. We spoke with eight people who lived at Crossways. Comments included "The home is very good", "The staff treat me well", "I enjoy the food - very good meals", "The manager is very nice" and "I cannot grumble, its good here." All people confirmed they felt safe at the home and they didn't have any concerns or complaints.

We looked at three care records and all had an assessment of their health and social needs completed. There were individual life plans and risk assessments in place. There was evidence within them to show they were evaluated on a regular basis. This meant that the home could demonstrate they could meet people's needs and maintain their health and well being.

We found that the provider had effective systems in place in relation to the training of its employees. We spoke to five members of staff. They commented "The staff team get on well together", "I enjoy the training", "The staff team are very good and caring", "We get lots of training", "The manager is really good", "I like the variety of my job. No day is the same" and "I found the training good and informative."

We also spoke to one relative and a health care professional. They commented "The home is clean and odour free", "The staff are lovely", "The staff are good and welcoming" and "There is a nice atmosphere here."

31 January 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with the people living at the home and they all agreed that the staff were very nice, polite and respectful and we observed staff responding to people with patience and kindness.

People living at the home told us that they felt well cared for, that staff come when they are needed and they were satisfied with the support they received. We received many positive comments about the home and the staff team including 'We like living here', 'The staff are great' and 'Its nice here.' Other comments included, 'Its nice here and the staff are good', It's very nice here. The staff are nice but there have been a lot of new ones recently and it takes time for them to get to know the routines' and 'I am quite happy here and I like being in my room. '

We received positive feedback about the staff team and we observed care staff carrying out their duties. The team appeared organised and there were sufficient numbers of staff on duty to meet the needs of the people who live in the home. We were told that there is an open atmosphere and that the manager and staff team were approachable.

On discussions with the staff team it was evident that they were aware of the peoples needs and that they had taken time to get to know them. They described the support that different people need within the home and that each person is an individual with needs that are specific to them alone. Other staff comments included, 'I have worked here 8 months. I have completed a range of training including moving and handling, fire awareness, health and safety, food hygiene and safeguarding. The staff team work well together and the new manager seems okay. I love my job and talking to the residents' and 'Have worked here over 10 years. The training is very good and I like working here. Spending time with the residents is very good. The staff are a nice group and the new manager is helpful.'