• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Burley House Nursing Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

258 Burley Road, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS4 2LA (0113) 230 5485

Provided and run by:
Embrace Lifestyles (B) Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

To Be Confirmed

During a routine inspection

This was an unannounced inspection carried out on the 21 July 2015.

Burley House is registered to provide nursing care for 22 people. It is situated in the Burley area of Leeds. Buses into Leeds City Centre and surrounding areas are within easy access. Local shops and amenities are a short distance from the home, and a large leisure complex is within ten minutes walking distance. Accommodation is on three levels, this consists of 18 single bedrooms and two double bedrooms. Communal space includes a dining room, a large lounge and a small quiet lounge.

At the time of this inspection the home had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

There were enough staff to keep people safe and staff training and support provided staff with the knowledge and skills to support people safely. Robust recruitment and selection procedures were in place to make sure suitable staff worked with people who used the service and staff completed an induction when they started work.

People told us they felt safe. Staff had a good understanding of safeguarding vulnerable adults and knew what to do to keep people safe. People were protected against the risks associated with medicines because the provider had appropriate arrangements in place to manage medicines safely.

Most people were happy living at the home and felt well cared for. People’s support plans contained sufficient and relevant information to provide consistent, care and support. However, they were a little bulky and some information was out of date. People had a good experience at mealtimes. People received good support that ensured their health care needs were met. Staff were aware and knew how to respect people’s privacy and dignity.

The support plans we looked at contained appropriate mental capacity assessments. At the time of our inspection there was no-one subject to a Deprivation of Liberty Safeguard authorisation.

There was opportunity for people to be involved in a range of activities within the home or the local community. However, opportunities to carry out activities in relation to life skills was limited and not always recorded.

The service had good management and leadership. People got opportunity to comment on the quality of service and influence service delivery. Effective systems were in place which ensured people received safe quality care. Complaints were welcomed and were investigated and responded to appropriately.

6 June 2013

During a routine inspection

Before people received any care or treatment they were routinely asked for their consent. Members of staff told us they always explained all procedures and treatments. People had contributed their preferences and their experiences were taken into account in relation to how care and support was delivered. One person told us, 'I can do what I want.' Another person said, 'I can choose what I want to wear.'

People's needs were assessed and care and support was planned and delivered in line with their individual care needs. The care plans contained a good level of information setting out exactly how each person should be supported to ensure that their needs were met. One person told us, 'I like it here.' Another person said, 'Everything is good.'

We observed people were cared for in a clean, hygienic environment. There were effective systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection. However, the home was in need of refurbishment. The people we spoke with told us they had no concerns with the cleanliness of the home.

We found that people were supported by sufficient numbers of qualified, skilled and experienced staff which met people's needs. People we spoke with told us there were always enough staff to help them when they needed support.

There were quality monitoring programmes in place, which included people giving feedback about their care, support and treatment. This provided a good overview of the quality of the service's provided.

20 June 2012

During a routine inspection

People told us they were happy with the care provided. People told us they were able to choose what they wanted to do each day, decide if they wanted to join in with the activities and what clothes they wanted to wear. All five people told us they could choose what time they got up, what time they went to bed and what they had to eat. Everyone told us there were plenty of activities and they enjoyed taking part. Each person we spoke with told us their dignity was respected and confidentiality was always maintained. All the five people we spoke with told us that staff encouraged them to be as independent as possible.

People who used the service told us they were happy living at the home and they were well looked after.

Four people told us that they felt safe at the home and they would tell staff or the manager if they were worried about anything. Three people that we spoke with told us that they were happy with how their money was managed.