• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Real Life Options - Nottingham

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 1 D, Unicorn House, Wellington Street, Ripley, Derbyshire, DE5 3DZ (01773) 741745

Provided and run by:
Real Life Options

All Inspections

21 April 2015

During a routine inspection

We inspected this service on 21 April 2015 and the inspection was announced. This meant the provider and staff knew we would be visiting the service’s office before we arrived.

Real Life Options – Nottingham provides personal care and support to younger adults and older people living in their own homes or in care settings in Derbyshire and Nottingham. This includes people with learning disabilities, mental health or autism. At the time of this inspection there were 29 people using the service.

There was no registered manager in post. There were two managers at the service who were covering this position. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons.’ Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At our previous inspection during February 2014, the service was meeting the regulations that we checked.

People using the service were protected from abuse because the provider had taken steps to minimise the risk of abuse. People who used the service told us they felt safe.

We had received information during February 2015 which suggested that sufficient staff were not available to meet people's needs. We looked into these as part of our inspection and found that there was currently sufficient staff to support people.

Recruitment procedures ensured that suitable staff were employed to work with people who used the service.

People and their relatives told us that staff treated them with dignity and respected their privacy.

Staff understood people’s needs and abilities and were provided with training to support them to meet the needs of people they cared for. People’s needs and preferences were met when they were supported with their dietary needs.

People were supported to take part in community activities of their choice, so that they were able to maintain and develop their hobbies and interests.

The provider’s complaints policy and procedure were accessible to people who used the service and their relatives. People knew how to make a complaint and were confident that their complaint would be fully investigated and action taken if necessary.

Arrangements were in place to assess and monitor the quality of the service, so that actions could be put in place to drive improvement.

Staff told us that they received support from the management team. The management of the service were open and transparent.

26 February 2014

During a routine inspection

In this report, the name of a registered manager appears who was not managing the regulatory activities at this location at the time of the inspection. Their name appears because they were still a Registered Manager on our register at the time.

We spoke with several people who used the service. Some people due to their communication needs were unable to give us their opinion of the support. We observed staff supporting several people and saw that there was a good rapport between people using the service and the staff team. People using the service that were able to give us their views told us they were happy with the support they received from the staff team. One person said, 'The staff are very nice and they turn up on time to support me.' Another person confirmed they had regular staff that supported them and told us that they liked the staff.

Information regarding people's method of communication was recorded in their support plans. This enabled staff to support them according to their preference and choice.

People's preferences and the level of support they needed was delivered in line with their individual support plans.

Records seen and discussions with the staff demonstrated that staff were supported in their job and provided with ongoing training to ensure they had the skills needed to support people effectively.

Systems were in place to monitor the care and services provided, and to identify and manage risks to ensure the service was run safely.

25 January 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with four people who use the service. Although the people we spoke to had limited verbal communication they were all able to indicate that they were happy with the care and support they received from Real Life Options. We also spoke to five staff members, and two local authority care managers.

We found people were asked their preferences and given choices about their care and support. One person told us 'I am looked after well.' Another person told us 'I am happy, not upset.'

We found people experienced care and support that met their needs and protected their rights. A local authority care manager told us they were 'highly satisfied with the service' and 'families have said they are very impressed with the service.' We found peoples' care needs had been thoroughly assessed and care and support was delivered in a way that met peoples' needs and ensured their safety and welfare.

People were protected from the risk of abuse, staff knew how to raise any concerns.

We found there was a clear and up to date recruitment procedure in place that was followed by the service. This meant that people were cared for, or supported by, suitably qualified, skilled and experienced staff.

People using the service were given information, in an easy-read format, about how to make a complaint. The provider kept a record of all complaints made and responded to complaints in a timely manner.

26 September 2011

During a routine inspection

We spoke with three people who used the service and ten members of staff.

People able to share their experiences with us spoke highly of care and support they received, and felt their needs were being met.

People said they liked the staff and felt that staff treated them with dignity and respected their privacy. People also felt safe and able to raise concerns with staff if they were unhappy.

Two people told us they were involved in planning their move to their new home, and chose their colour schemes and furniture.

People told us they are given information to help them make choices about their lives. One person told us 'staff explain things to me in a way I can understand to help me to make decisions'.

People said they are encouraged to do things for themselves and learn new skills. One person told us '' my day is planned around what I want to do, and I go to lots of places and I am involved in activities I enjoy'.