Archived: Holywell Bay Care Home

Rhubarb Hill, Holywell Bay, Newquay, Cornwall, TR8 5PT (01637) 830801

Provided and run by:
Newport Care Limited

All Inspections

9 October 2013

During an inspection in response to concerns

During our inspection we spoke with the manager, deputy manager, a consultant who was supporting the home and seven members of staff.

On the day of our inspection we observed care staff show kindness and compassion through their actions at times throughout the day.

The staff we spoke with told us a number of changes had been made since our last inspection in July 2013. These included different routines for staff and people who lived at Holywell Bay Care Home.

Respect and dignity regarding people's choices and care needs were not always respected.

Care plans had not been completed to include up to date information on people's specific care needs and choices.

The quality assurance monitoring was not effective. Action plans sent to the Care Quality Commission had not been achieved to ensure people's care was provided to a good standard in a clean and comfortable environment.

Staffing of registered nurses and care workers was inconsistent and one member of staff told us this had an impact on the care that was provided.

Documentation was not held securely or confidentially within the home. Care plans had been completed and printed off with the wrong names on.

15, 16 July 2013

During a routine inspection

This inspection was carried out over two days to ensure the home had made improvements since our last inspection in May 2013.

During our inspection we walked around the home, spoke with the manager, staff and two people who were visiting their relative. Due to people's dementia needs or mental health needs we were unable to ask them for their views on the service, therefore we carried out a 'Short Observational Framework for Inspection' (SOFI) in the dining room during lunch time to observe the care and treatment that was provided. We also observed the care that people received throughout the two days of our inspection.

The privacy and dignity for people living at Holywell Bay Care home had not been respected at all times. People's personal information was available for others to see.

We found that people who needed full support to mobilise were moved from their beds early in the morning and then back again late in the afternoon, at times against people's expressed choice. This did not respect people's dignity or choice.

We saw that people were not provided with adequate care to meet their needs throughout the day. We observed that people who required assistance and/or encouragement with meals did not receive adequate food and drinks. Charts used to monitor how much a person had consumed were inaccurate and did not identify when people had not eaten.

People who lived at the home were not protected from the risks of abuse as the staff had not received adequate training, were not knowledgeable, and the care plans did not fully direct staff.

The provider had completed some maintenance work that we highlighted as a potential risk to both the people who lived at the home and staff during our inspection in May 2013. However the provider had not taken sufficient action to ensure the building internally and externally was safe.

There were insufficient qualified and unqualified staff on duty to meet the needs of the people living at Holywell Bay care Home.

The home did not have processes in place to monitor the service to ensure the environment and the care provided was safe for people who lived in the home.

29 May 2013

During a routine inspection

The privacy and dignity for people living at Holywell Bay Care Home had not been respected at all times. People's personal information was available for others to see.

People who lived at the home were not protected from the risks of abuse as the incidents and accidents that staff had recorded had not been analysed. Incidents had not been reported to the local authority responsible for investigating any allegations of abuse.

Unplanned restraint had been used when a person had been physically aggressive. The care plans and restraint policy lacked detail to direct staff as to when and how this should be carried out.

Manual handling practices were unsafe and care plans did not direct staff fully on how to assist people with their mobility.

The home was seen to be poorly maintained and unclean. There was no system in place to audit the environment. Risk assessments to reduce the potential risk of injury to staff and people who lived at the home had not been completed.

There was insufficient qualified and unqualified staff on duty to meet the needs of the people living at Holywell Bay Care Home.

The home did not have processes in place to monitor the service to ensure the environment and the care provided was safe for people living at the home.

3 January 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with some people who lived at Holywell Bay and they told us they liked living at the home and felt happy to approach any member of staff if they had any concerns or worries. We observed staff interacting with people who used the service and saw they were respectful, friendly and supportive to them.

Care records directed nurses and care workers in how to deliver the care and support each person needed. They contained detailed daily statements about people's ongoing welfare and up to date risk assessments.

We were told that staffing levels had been increased and were being further increased in the two weeks following the inspection in order to meet the diverse needs and dependency of people who used the service.

We were told that there were robust staff support systems in place and access to training relevant to each person's role. We saw there were systems in place to give staff information about how to recognise and report potential abuse.

The environment the home offers, continues to be improved with new fixtures, fittings in the communal areas and carpets. These were just some of the improvements made over the last six months.

Routine and planned maintenance is ongoing in order to ensure the ongoing safety of the home. Audits are ongoing, and include feedback from people who used the service, to ensure the quality of the service is monitored and improved.

15 June 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Some of the people that used the service at Holywell Bay were not able to tell us about their experiences. To help us to understand people's experiences, we used our SOFI (Short Observational Framework for Inspection) tool. The SOFI tool allowed us to spend time watching what was going on and helped us record how people spent their time, the type of support they got and whether they had positive experiences.

We spent 30 minutes observing life for people in two of the communal rooms. There were 15 people in the rooms during that time.

During the observations we saw staff helping four people to mobilise. One person was asked if they wanted a cigarette and was then supported to have one.

We saw two people accessing the garden area independently. The care workers knew that they had gone outside and because the weather was cold and windy they kept asking them if they were warm enough, they did not stop them using the outside space and both people came back in when they were ready to.

A number of people were watching the television and others were involved in one to one activities of their choice. We heard care workers asking people what they would like to do and giving them ideas if they could not make a choice.

Overall the atmosphere in the home during our visit was relaxed and we saw that there was a positive rapport between the people who lived in the home and the staff.

One person told us that they liked their room. Another person said that they liked the space in the home.

We were told that the new manager was approachable. Two members of staff told us that there had some recent staff turnover but did not feel that this had affected consistency of care.

30 August 2012

During a routine inspection

Due to people's disability, many of those living in the home have difficulty conversing about their experiences of living in the home. However we did spend two hours talking with various people using the service, and subsequently observing practice. Most people said they were generally happy living in the home although a few felt their freedom of movement was overly restricted. All those that we were able to speak with said staff were hardworking and caring. Most people said the food was good and there was enough to eat. Everyone said they were happy with their accommodation. Some people also said they would like more opportunities to participate in activities in and outside the home. Some of the people living in the home said there should be more staff, as at times staff were overstretched.

10, 11 November 2010

During an inspection in response to concerns

Many of the people using the service have limited capacity to express an opinion. People who were able to talk with us said they were happy with the support they received from staff, and the service they received from the home. The relatives we spoke to also confirmed this was the case and expressed no concerns or complaints about the service provided.