• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Elgin Close

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

1-3 Elgin Close, Elgin Avenue, London, W12 9NH (020) 3815 0035

Provided and run by:
Notting Hill Housing Trust

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

4 January 2018

During a routine inspection

We carried out this unannounced inspection on 4 and 5 January 2018. At our last inspection on 30 October and 3 November 2015 we found the service was “Good”. At this inspection we found that the service remained “Good”.

This service provides care and support to people living in specialist ‘extra care’ housing. Extra care housing is purpose-built or adapted single household accommodation in a shared site or building. The accommodation is rented and is the occupant’s own home. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for extra care housing; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support service.

People using the service lived in one of 36 self-contained flats in a single four-storey building. At the time of our inspection 36 people were receiving personal care. Each flat consisted of a living room, bedroom, kitchen and bathroom. People also had access to shared facilities including bathrooms equipped with lifting baths, dining rooms on each floor and a guest room for overnight guests. The service adjoined Elgin Close resource centre, which provides activities and a catering service for residents.

The service had a registered manager who has been in post since January 2016, and had been registered since August 2016. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We found that the provider had systems to safeguard people from abuse and manage risks to people who used the service. Staffing levels were suitable to meet people’s needs and people’s care visits were organised through a rounds system which meant it was clear who needed to be seen and when. This was planned in line with people’s care plans and checked at handover to ensure people had received the right care. Care plans clearly documented people’s needs but weren’t always easy to follow; however we saw examples of accessible communications and the service had developed documents in order to improve this further.

Care workers were recruited in line with safer recruitment measures and practical exercises carried out to ensure that staff had the right values to deliver good care. Staff received the right training and supervision to carry out their roles.

People received the right support to eat and drink well, including assessing people’s needs and making sure that people had the right food delivered by the onsite catering service. People’s health needs were assessed and people received support to stay healthy, including diabetes plans and support to attend appointments. Health and safety checks were carried out in order to ensure a safe environment, and people were able to call for help using intercoms and pendant alarm systems.

People were protected from medicines errors by correct management and audit of medicines. Where errors had occurred the service had procedures to ensure that lessons were learned and that these were not repeated. Managers had systems in place to make sure people received the right care.

At our previous inspection we made a recommendation about how the provider assessed people’s decision-making abilities in line with the Mental Capacity Act. We found the provider had acted on this recommendation and had robust procedures for assessing people’s capacity and to demonstrate that they were working in line with people’s best interests. This included working with other health professionals to consider advance decisions such as hospital admission in the event of ill health.

There were good systems of communication in place, such as handovers, team meetings and newsletters. People were engaged with the service through tenants meetings and their views were recorded in tenant profiles. The service was in the process of implementing key-working in order to support people to express their views about their care. People knew how to make complaints and who the manager was, and complaints were investigated and suitably resolved.

The provider told us they intended to merge with another provider later in the year. This means that this location will be archived at this time and registered under the new, merged provider. We will aim to return to this service within 12 months of registration.

30 October & 3 November 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place over two days on 30 October and 3 November 2015. On the first day, our visit was unannounced, and we informed the service we would be returning on 3 November. At our last inspection on 14 May 2013 the provider was found to be meeting all the regulations we inspected.

Elgin Close is an extra care service which provides personal care and support to older people and people with physical disabilities. The building consists of 36 self-contained flats over four floors. Each floor has a communal kitchen, and on the ground floor there is a large shared lounge. Two of the flats are designed for couples, and at the time of our visit there were 37 people living there.

The service had a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People using the service had thorough and up to date care plans and risk assessments which meant people’s care was appropriate and person centred, and risks to individuals were managed in a way which promoted their safety and respected their freedom.

We observed good, caring interactions and people were treated as individuals by staff. Staff were well-trained and caring, and staffing levels were appropriate for the service. Medicines were well managed, and audits were conducted both within the organisation and by an external pharmacist to ensure that they were constantly offering a high quality service.

The provider made sure that people’s views were considered throughout, consulting people on activities, food and responding well to people’s complaints. People’s views, and their personalities, were present throughout care plans, and the staff made sure people understood and agreed to their care wherever possible.

Staff did not always understand their responsibilities under the Mental Capacity Act (2005), and it was not always clear staff were working in line with this legislation. We have made a recommendation about showing how consent is sought in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

People who used the service spoke highly of the staff; staff celebrated people’s life stories and were genuinely caring.

14 May 2013

During a routine inspection

People lived in their own flats at this location with support from staff. Where extra support was required then this was arranged by the person themselves or by social services. We spoke with four people who lived at Elgin Close and they told us how happy they were living independently but with extra support when they needed it. People were happy with staff, who came on time and understood their needs. One person said the service was 'ideal for me' and another said 'I could not wish for better'.

People and their representatives were involved in planning the care and support that people received. The last survey of people using the service from February 2013 reported that 92% of people said that the services currently met all their needs. Consent was sought prior to any care being given. Staff had an understanding of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and support and advice about this was available from the local authority and the provider if needed.

There were sufficient staff on duty both during the day and at night with support from the provider's management team. All care staff were provided with training so that they could meet the needs of the people living at Elgin Close. The provider worked cooperatively with other providers so that people's needs were met.

There were systems for managing complaints and people were encouraged to give their feedback about the service and raise any concerns with staff. There had been no formal complaints on the last 12 months.

7 June 2012

During a routine inspection

The people we spoke with were all positive about living at Elgin Close. We heard that people rated the service as 'excellent' and 'loved it here'. They said they were treated as individuals and with respect by staff. People told us that they liked having their own space and could be independent when they chose but also valued the communal aspects of living at Elgin Close, such as meals provided, staff assistance and group activities. They said they felt safe but would raise a concern if they had one.