• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Abbeyvale Care Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Laidler Close, Blackhall, Hartlepool, Cleveland, TS27 4QR (0191) 586 9358

Provided and run by:
Executive Health Care Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

26 January 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 26 January 2016 and was unannounced. This meant the staff and the provider did not know we would be visiting. The home had a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with CQC to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The registered manager was not present during our visit however the deputy manager was present and was acting as manager at the time of the inspection.

Abbeyvale Care Centre was last inspected by CQC on 11 March 2014 and was compliant with the regulations in force at the time.

Abbeyvale Care Centre is registered to provide personal care and accommodation for up to 56 people. The home is located in Blackhall near Hartlepool and is owned and run by Executive Health Care Limited. Accommodation is provided across two levels within four units. There are two general residential units, Brockwell and Granary, a unit for people with dementia-type illnesses, Beechwood and Cavendish, a unit with fourteen apartments for people who have acquired brain injuries. On the day of our inspection there were 41 people using the service. The home comprised of 42 bedrooms, all of which were en-suite and 14 apartments. Facilities included several lounges, dining rooms and kitchenettes, a hair salon and an enclosed garden area.

People who used the service and their relatives were complimentary about the standard of care at Abbeyvale Care Centre. We saw staff supported and helped to maintain people’s independence. People were encouraged to care for themselves where possible. Staff treated people with dignity and respect.

The registered provider had an effective recruitment and selection procedure in place and carried out relevant checks when they employed staff. There were sufficient numbers of staff on duty in order to meet the needs of people using the service.

Training records were up to date and staff had regular supervision meetings and appraisals, which meant that staff were properly supported to provide care to people who used the service.

The layout of the building provided adequate space for people with walking aids or wheelchairs to mobilise safely around the home and most areas of the home were suitably designed for people with dementia type conditions.

The service was working within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and any conditions on authorisations to deprive a person of their liberty were being met.

We saw mental capacity assessments had been completed for people and best interest decisions made for their care and treatment. Care records contained evidence of consent.

People were protected against the risks associated with the unsafe use and management of medicines.

People had access to food and drink throughout the day and we saw staff supported people to eat at meal times when required.

People who used the service had access to a range of activities in the home.

All the care records we looked at showed people’s needs were assessed. Care plans and risk assessments were in place when required and daily records were up to date. Care plans were written in a person centred way and were reviewed regularly.

We saw staff used a range of assessment tools and kept clear records about how care was to be delivered and people who used the service had access to healthcare services and received ongoing healthcare support.

The registered provider had a complaints policy and procedure in place and complaints were fully investigated.

The registered provider had a quality assurance system in place and gathered information about the quality of their service from a variety of sources.

11 March 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

At the previous inspection in September 2013 we found that staff were not always being appropriately supported in relation to their responsibilities.

The provider sent us an action plan which had been completed following our inspection. This included the action they were going to take to meet the regulation and the timescale within which this would be achieved.

We returned to the home on 11 March 2014 to review whether the provider had made improvements. We found improvements had been made in this area.

We found staff had completed or updated their training around care and safety. We also saw the provider had plans in place for further staff training over the coming months.

We saw staff had received supervisions and appraisals and these had been completed by the registered manager and unit managers.

We spoke with senior care assistants, care assistants, domestic staff and the registered manager. They all told us they felt supported in their roles. One member of staff said 'If we have any problems or issues, (the manager) is great for support.'

This meant people were cared for by staff who were appropriately supported to deliver care and treatment safely and to an appropriate standard.

4 September 2013

During a routine inspection

People were asked for their consent before they received any care or treatment. The staff we spoke with understood the need for people to consent to the care they provided.

People told us they were happy with the care and support they received. Comments included 'It's alright, I like it', 'The care is ok ' I can't really grumble' and 'It's a nice place here.'

We found arrangements were in place to deal with foreseeable emergencies. The provider had contingency plans in place in order to maintain business continuity.

There was enough equipment to promote the independence and comfort of people who used the service. We saw equipment was stored safely and securely throughout the home and saw records to confirm it was being safely maintained.

People said they were happy with the staff employed by the service and the care they provided. However, we found that staff were not always being appropriately supported in relation to their responsibilities.

People's complaints were fully investigated and resolved, where possible, to their satisfaction.

27 April 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke to people and relatives during our inspection. People told us they were treated with respect and were given lots of choices. People told us that staff helped them do things they wanted to do, one person told us 'They took me to the church so I could go to my friend's funeral.'

People told us that they enjoyed living at Abbeyvale Care Centre and that the staff were very kind.

Relatives told us they were very happy with the care provided by Abbeyvale Care Centre. One relative spoke very passionately about the care delivered, they told us 'It's just fantastic', 'Moving my mum here was the best thing I've ever done.' Relatives told us that they were very involved in their relatives care and that the staff kept them up to date with everything.

Relatives told us that they knew their relatives were safe at Abbeyvale Care Centre. One relative told us 'Julie (the manager) made it very clear when we first arrived that if we had any concerns we could speak to her.'