• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Marian House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

803 Chester Road, Erdington, Birmingham, West Midlands, B24 0BX (0121) 373 6140

Provided and run by:
T Keogh and A Keogh

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

15 November 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 15 and 17 November 2016 and was an unannounced comprehensive rating inspection. The location was last inspected in November 2014 and was rated as ‘Good’ overall.

Marian House is a registered care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to 20 people with learning disabilities. At the time of our inspection there were 19 people living at the home.

There was a registered manager in post at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were kept safe. Staff had received training and understood the different types of abuse and knew what action they would take if they thought a person was at risk of harm. Staff were able to recognise the signs of abuse and raise concerns if needed. Staff were provided with sufficient guidance on how to support people’s medical care and support needs. People’s medicines were managed and administered safely and as prescribed.

People were supported by enough staff that had been safely recruited. People and relatives felt that staff demonstrated the appropriate skills and knowledge to provide good care and support. Staff were trained and supported so that they had the knowledge and skills they required to enable them to care for people in a way that met their individual needs and preferences.

People were encouraged to make choices and were involved in the care and support they received. Staff had an awareness of the Mental Capacity Act and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguarding (DoLS) and how to support people within their best interests. Staff were respectful of people’s diverse needs and the importance of promoting equality.

Staff were caring and treated people with dignity and respect. People’s independence was respected and promoted and staff responded to people’s support needs in a timely manner. People and their relatives felt they could speak with the provider about their worries or concerns and were confident that they would be listened to and have their concerns addressed.

Staff spoke positively about the provider and the supportive culture they had established at the home. The provider had quality assurance and audit systems in place to monitor the care and support people received, ensuring that the quality of service provided remained consistent and effective.

11 and 12 November 2014

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 11 and 12 November 2014 and was unannounced. At the last inspection carried out on 19 September 2013 we found that the provider was meeting all of the requirements of the regulations inspected.

Marian House is a care home which is registered to provide care to up to 20 people. The home specialises in the care of people with a learning disability and physical disabilities. At the time of our inspection there were 20 people living at Marian House.

Marian House is required to have a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run. At the time of this inspection a registered manager was in post.  

Two people that we spoke with commented to us that they, “Felt safe” at Marian House. All of the relatives spoken with told us that they believed their family member was safe living there. Staff we spoke with told us that they thought people were safe. There were arrangements in place to protect people from the risk of harm because risks had been assessed and actions put in to place to reduce the risk of harm to people.

People had their prescribed medicines available to them and appropriate records were kept when medicines were administered by trained care staff.

People had mental capacity assessments completed. We saw that an advocacy service was available to people when a specific decision needed to be made. We found that the provider was meeting the requirements set out in the Mental Capacity Act (2005) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS).

The staff on duty knew the people they were supporting. We saw that they were kind and caring towards people that lived there. Throughout our inspection we observed person centred care that focused upon the individual and involved them in their care and making choices.    

The home had a safe system in place to recruit new staff and carried out necessary pre-employment checks. Staff received an induction and on-going training and supervision so that they had the knowledge and skills to meet people’s needs. All of the staff we spoke with understood their job role and responsibilities.

We found that effective systems were in place to monitor and improve the quality of service people received.

19 September 2013

During a routine inspection

There were nineteen people living in the home on the day of our inspection. We sampled five care files, five staff files; spoke with the manager, four care staff, eight people that used the service and /or their relatives.

People were involved in decisions about their care and were asked for their consent before care was given. Where people did not have mental capacity to consent, care was provided in their best interests. One person said, 'Staff always ask me what I want help with.' Another person said, 'I choose when I get up, go to bed and how I spend my time.' Staff would never force me to do something I didn't want.'

People's needs were assessed and planned. People received care in the way they wanted and as identified. External health professionals such as specialist consultants, community nurses and dieticians were involved in their care so that people's health care needs were monitored and met. One relative spoken with said, 'This place stands for everything that is good about care for younger people.'

People were involved in a variety of interesting activities. One person said, 'I go to college and we go to Drayton Manor Park and have fun.'

Staff training was up to date and staff were supported in their roles.

People received their medicines as prescribed by their doctor to ensure their health needs were met.

Robust audit systems were in place for monitoring and improving the quality of the service, when needed, for people living in the home.

12 February 2013

During a routine inspection

At the time of our visit there were19 people living at the home. We spoke to six people, three staff and the manager.

People were treated with dignity and respect. Staff offered people choices and ensured these were facilitated.

People's needs were met in an individualised way and their health needs were met with support from staff and a variety of health professionals. One person told us about their health needs and the medicines they took. This meant that people were involved in their care.

One person told us, 'I like it here'. Another person said, 'I've got a nice big bedroom.' This showed that people liked living in the home.

People were involved in washing up dishes, chatting to each other, going shopping and college. This meant people led fulfilled lives.

Staff were knowledgeable about people's needs. Staff were supported to carry out their roles safely. Staff told us they liked working in the home and some staff had worked there a long time. This meant people were supported by staff who knew them well.

People living in the home were protected from the risks of abuse and unsafe care.

The provider ensured that there was adequate monitoring of the service to ensure that people received a good service that met their needs.

20 October 2011

During a routine inspection

People living at Marian House were happy there. They were well cared for by a competent

skilled and friendly staff team. They participated in numerous activities and were

encouraged to make their own choices and decisions.