• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Briar House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

186 Bury Old Road, Heywood, Lancashire, OL10 3LN (01706) 621906

Provided and run by:
Mrs Anna Geraldine Ellis

All Inspections

10 January 2017

During a routine inspection

This was an announced inspection that took place on the 10 January 2017. Our last inspection took place on 16 November 2015 when we found that the service was in breach of the Regulation 11 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. This was because we found the provider was not meeting the requirements of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS); these safeguards ensure that any restrictions in place are legally authorised and in a person’s best interests. At this inspection, we found that the required action had been taken in relation to the DoLS and the breach was met.

Briar House is a large semi-detached house, which is registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to three people with a learning disability. There were two people living at the home at the time of our inspection both of whom had lived there for 19 years. One person who had limited communication skills was at home during our inspection.

The service had a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The registered manager was also the registered the provider who visited the home regularly and was available by telephone at other times. The person carrying out the day-to-day running of the service was the deputy manager who was also registered with us at a second home owned by the provider.

Staff had received training in safeguarding adults. They were able to tell us of the correct action they would take if they witnessed or suspected abuse. There were sufficient staff on duty to meet their needs.

Staff recruitment procedures were sufficiently robust to protect people who used the service from the risks of unsuitable staff being employed.

People’s care records showed that risks to people’s health and well-being had been identified. Systems were in place to deal with any emergency that could affect the provision of care such as utility failures. Personal evacuation plans were in place.

Systems were in place to ensure medicines were safely administered and people received their medicines as prescribed.

Staff had received the training they required to meet people’s needs.

People’s health needs were met and if a person had a medical appointment additional staff were arranged to support people to attend the appointment.

We saw that there was plenty of food available at the home for people to eat. We saw that staff offered choices to the person eating lunch.

The premises was seen to be spacious, comfortable and homely. All areas of the home were seen to be clean and tidy.

The atmosphere at Briar House was calm, relaxed and friendly. Staff knew people’s likes and dislikes very well and we saw positive interactions between people.

People’s needs were documented in their care records. There was evidence that people had been involved in reviewing their care plans.

People were involved in individual activities within the home and also within the community. People were encouraged to maintain as much independence as possible.

No formal complaints had been received about the service and feedback from the local authority quality assurance team was positive.

Staff told us that they enjoyed working at Briar House and that the deputy manager and registered manager were approachable and supportive.

16 November 2015

During a routine inspection

This was an announced inspection that took place on the 16 November 2015.

Briar House is a large semi-detached house which is registered to provide accommodation and personal care for three people with a learning disability.

The service had a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The registered manager compiles the staff rota, conducts the staff supervisions and staff meetings. They were available by telephone at other times. There was also a manager in day to day charge; they visited the home twice a week and were available by telephone at other times.

During this inspection we found a breach of Regulation 11 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. This was because there were not robust procedures in place to assess people’s capacity to consent to their care and treatment. We found the provider was not meeting the requirements of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS); these safeguards ensure that any restrictions in place are legally authorised and in a person’s best interests. You can see what action we have told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

People told us they felt safe at Briar House. There were sufficient staff on duty to meet their needs.

Staff had received training in safeguarding adults. They were able to tell us of the correct action they would take if they witnessed or suspected abuse.

Staff recruitment procedures were not robust. The record keeping did not evidence that the people who used the service were protected from the risks of unsuitable staff being employed.

Systems were in place to ensure medicines were safely administered and people received their medicines as prescribed.

All areas of the home were clean. Systems were in place to deal with any emergency that could affect the provision of care such as utility failures. Personal evacuation plans were in place and regular checks were carried out to ensure staff were aware of the action they should take in the event of a fire at the service.

People’s care records showed that risks to people’s health and well-being had been identified. However the risk assessments for falls were not detailed. This meant that staff may not know how to support people safely. Staff supported people to attend regular appointments to ensure that their health needs were met. People’s needs were documented in their care records. There was evidence that people had been involved in reviewing their care plans.

Staff received the training they required to meet people’s needs including an induction, manual handling and emergency first aid courses. However, staff members did not have a clear understanding of their responsibilities under the Mental Capacity Act. The registered manager undertook regular supervision and appraisals with the staff.

People we spoke with said that the staff were kind, caring and knew them well. We saw the staff demonstrate that they knew the needs of the people who used the service. Staff told us that they enjoyed working at Briar House and that the manager and registered manager were approachable and supportive.

Activities in the local community were arranged by staff every week. Whenever a person had a medical appointment additional staff were arranged to support people to attend the appointment.

A number of quality audits were in place. Evidence was seen that any actions required were identified and completed.

18 December 2013

During a routine inspection

The three people living at Briar House had all lived there for a considerable number of years.

The staff team had been stable for many years.

At the time of our visit, one member of staff was on duty and all three service users were at home. They were friendly and welcoming and were happy to talk to us about their experiences at the home. They were positive about the home and the staff and said they liked living at Briar House. They said their choices were listened to and they were able to do the things they wanted to do.

Two people told us that they attended local day centres, although one had not attended for some time due to mobility issues. They told us that they enjoyed attending the centres. Staff told us that attending the centres enabled the service users to maintain some independence and take part in activities away from the home.

The atmosphere at Briar House was relaxed and homely; we observed staff interacting with services users and engaging in conversations. The staff clearly understood their needs and had good relationships with all of them.

Briar House had two living rooms but at the time of the visit, one was being used as a ground floor bedroom for one service user, due to mobility issues.

The registered manager was unavailable on the day of the visit but we were able to speak to her deputy.

4 October 2012

During a routine inspection

People living at Briar House have lived together for a considerable number of years. They were supported by a stable staff team.

At the time of our visit, two of the people living at Briar House were not at home as they attended a local day centre. We were told that they enjoyed attending the centre as it enabled them to maintain some independence and take part in activities away from the home.

Staff supported each person based on their individual needs and wishes. We observed staff interacting with the person at home during our visit. This person had limited verbal communication, however it was clear staff understood their needs and had a good relationship with them. They made us welcome and were happy chat with us.

Staff were also spoken with during our visit. They told us they enjoyed their work and were supported by the provider/manager if they needed anything.

21 November 2011

During a routine inspection

During our visit we spent time briefly observing and speaking with people. We were told, 'I like living here, I'm happy', 'I like cooking' and 'I've got a lovely room'. One person also told us that they 'help to dry the pots'.

From our observations people were nicely dressed, well groomed and looked clean and tidy. People made us very welcome during our visit and showed us around the home.

It was evident from our observations and discussion with people that both the provider and staff had a good understanding of peoples support needs and enjoyed a friendly rapport with each other.

Staff spoken with said they felt supported by the provider and were able to approach her if they needed to discuss anything. Staff confirmed they had received necessary training and were happy in their role.

Staff spoken with said that the provider 'was available whenever we need her, we can call her at any time'.