This inspection took place on 24 February 2016 and was announced. We gave the provider 48 hours’ notice because the location provides a home care service and we wanted to make sure someone would be available to speak with us. The agency was registered with CQC since 13 May 2011. The last inspection took place on 21 January 2014 and the provider was compliant with the regulations we checked.
Lifestyle Care Services Limited t/a Home Instead Senior Care is a care agency that provides personal care and support to people living with dementia, learning disabilities and autistic spectrum disorder, as well as older people, people who misuse drugs and alcohol and people with an eating disorder, physical disabilities or sensory impairments.
On the day of our inspection, the agency provided support for 61 people out of which 38 were receiving personal care.
There was a registered manager in post, who had been managing the service since June 2011. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the CQC to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
The registered manager was supported by a director who was the owner of the company and a deputy care manager as well as an administration team that consisted of a care workers’ coordinator, an in-house trainer and a community developer. At the time of our visit, the agency employed 47 care workers.
All people using the service and family members we spoke with told us they were happy with the agency and they described it as caring and responsive.
The agency had effective safeguarding procedures and people using the service were protected from harm and abuse. The agency assessed risks to people’s health and safety. Care workers had access to risk management plans that gave them guidance on how to mitigate/manage these risks.
The agency managed people’s medicine in a safe way and ensured any changes to people’s medicine were promptly noted and addressed. Any medicine errors were reported and investigated.
The agency had a rota system to ensure all care workers knew who they were assigned to visit that week and that all care workers’ planned absences were covered. People said they received regular support from the same care workers and the agency informed them if a different care worker was to attend instead.
The service had robust recruitment procedures to ensure only suitable care workers were appointed to work with people who used the service.
Care workers had sufficient skills and knowledge to provide effective support for people they cared for. Newly appointed workers received induction training before they started working unsupervised. All care workers were required to repeat trainings that the agency considered mandatory on a yearly basis.
Care workers received effective support in the form of regular one to one meetings, yearly appraisals, spot checks of their work and by attending team meetings.
The agency followed the principles of the MCA 2005. The agency discussed people’s mental capacity and encouraged people to make their choices where possible.
The agency carried out initial assessments in which they gathered all information on peoples care needs, health and wellbeing and personal likes and dislikes.
The agency had introduced a variety of systems to ensure that people were involved in planning of their care, they were encouraged to give feedback on the service they received and to take part in the activities organised by the agency.
People told us that care workers, who supported them, treated them with dignity and respect while providing personal care.
The management team introduced a matching service, which enabled them to match a care worker to a person, based on certain attributes. By doing so, the agency encouraged development of lasting and friendly relationships between people using the service and care workers who supported them.
The agency had a complaints procedure and people and their relatives knew how to raise any concerns about the care they received. The agency dealt with complaints promptly and to the satisfaction of people and their relatives.
People using the service and their relatives described the service as well led and that said they would recommend it to others who needed the support.
The management team encouraged care workers, people using the service and their families to discuss any matters related to how the agency was run.
The agency recognized the value of their workforce and introduced a care worker of the month and a care worker of the year award. Therefore, care workers knew that the management team appreciated and noticed their hard work.
The agency had robust quality assurance and audit systems to ensure effective reporting, monitoring, analysis and review of all aspects of the service provision.
The agency had a folder of policies and procedures that were regularly updated and care workers had access to.