You are here

Saint John of God Hospitaller Services - 22 Sandown Road Good

Inspection Summary


Overall summary & rating

Good

Updated 21 January 2020

Saint John of God Hospitaller Services - 22 Sandown Road, is a care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to nine people living with a physical, learning disability or autism. At the time of inspection, nine people were living at the home.

The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensured people who lived at the home can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People living at the home received planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that was appropriate and inclusive for them. Although the home is larger than current best practice guidance, there were deliberately no identifying signs, intercom, cameras, industrial bins or anything else outside to indicate it was a care home. Staff were also discouraged from wearing anything that suggested they were care staff when coming and going with people.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found.

People experienced care which was exceptionally person-centred, placing great emphasis upon ensuring people lived the best lives they could. Feedback received from relatives and a variety of visiting professionals described how the service had literally transformed people’s lives. They told us the change in people was amazing. One relative told us how as a result of the outstanding effort and level of care their loved one received from staff, they now were able to enjoy a relationship with their loved one, which was something they had not had previously.

Relatives and professionals told us people were safe living at the home. Risk assessments were in place to help staff keep people safe. Regular safety checks of the building were completed. Only suitable staff were employed. The manager used incidents as a learning opportunity to improve things.

People’s needs were assessed before they came to live at the home. Staff had appropriate skills to care for people. Staff received regular training. Relatives were very complimentary about how staff cared for their loved one, one relative told us, “Since [person’s name] has moved to Sandown Road, their quality of life has massively improved. They are doing things that would never have been possible in previous environments, and I believe that Sandown Road is enabling them to reach their potential. It has been wonderful to see.” People enjoyed a healthy and varied diet. People attended regular healthcare appointments. People’s bedrooms were decorated and furnished to their liking.

People received care from staff who were very caring and committed to their role. Staff were aware of the importance of maintaining both people’s dignity and independence. People were encouraged to be involved in their care to ensure their preference and choice were the focus of care delivered.

Regular reviews of people’s care were completed, to ensure good progress was made against planned outcomes. A complaints policy was in place, but no complaints had been received. People had access to documents in various formats to support their understanding and communication. End of life wishes were included in people’s care plans (where these could be established).

The service was without a registered manager. However, the provider had arranged for a peripatetic manager to oversee the service until the new manager came into post early 2020. They managed the service very well. The manager ensured information was shared with the appropriate authorities. When things had happened, action was taken to address any issues. A service improvement plan was in place and was updated monthly. The manager worked closely with various healthcare professionals. Staff, relatives and visiting professionals were very complimentary about the new ma

Inspection areas

Safe

Good

Updated 21 January 2020

The service was safe.

Details are in our safe findings below.

Effective

Good

Updated 21 January 2020

The service was effective.

Details are in effective findings below.

Caring

Good

Updated 21 January 2020

The service was caring.

Details are in our caring findings below.

Responsive

Outstanding

Updated 21 January 2020

The service was exceptionally responsive.

Details are in our responsive findings below.

Well-led

Good

Updated 21 January 2020

The service was well-led.

Details are in our well-led findings below.