• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Hertfordshire Domiciliary Care Services

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Woodhall Community Centre, Mill Green Road, Welwyn Garden City, AL7 3XD (01707) 258735

Provided and run by:
Saint John of God Hospitaller Services

All Inspections

4 May 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection was carried out on 04 May 2017 and was announced. On 08 May 2017 we visited people in their own homes to ask for their feedback about the service they received. At the last inspection of this service on 12 April 2016, the provider was found to be meeting the standards we inspected.

Hertfordshire Domiciliary Care Services provides personal care and support to people living in their own homes and supported living accommodation. There were 48 people using the service on the day of our inspection. However, only 11 of those people were receiving a regulated activity from the service. A regulated activity is registered under the Health and Social Care Act and this service is registered for the Regulated Activity of Personal Care.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run. In this instance the registered manager was also the provider.

The service had experienced some staffing difficulties and had changed management structure over the last two years. As a result people who used the service had not always experienced care and support which was effective and personalised.

People told us they were overall happy with the service, the only complaint they had was about not knowing which staff member would turn up and when they would receive the care and support they needed. People told us this had no effect on their safety; however they could only plan their days after staff visited them.

The registered manager and the provider recognised that the service they had provided was not always responsive and of good quality therefore they were not taking on care and support for additional people at this time. They had implemented new recruitment processes which were more effective and since November 2016 they managed to recruit a high number of permanent staff, however there were still vacancies in staffing hours.

Staff we spoke with were knowledgeable about people`s needs and the risks involved in people`s daily living, however people`s care plans were not always reflective of their current needs. Although staff were trained in safe administration of medicines they were not always following best practice guidance when administering people`s medicines.

Staff felt that they had received better support from the management team in the past couple of months than before. They told us things had slightly improved and staffing was better; however last minute sickness or absence still caused stress and put pressure on them to cover for these.

There were systems in place to monitor the quality of the service and additional systems were being developed to help ensure the support provided was consistent. This included implementing a system where time specific calls were marked on staff`s rotas to ensure visit times were on time and for the full duration of the time allocated to people.

People told us they felt safe and trusted the staff who offered them care and support. Staff were knowledgeable about safeguarding procedures and how to report their concerns. Staff knew people well and treated them with dignity and respect.

People told us that they were supported to make their own decisions and choices which staff respected. They told us they had discussions with their key worker about their care plans and their needs. The provider had started organising meetings with people to gather their views on what they liked and disliked about the service and how to improve.

12 April 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection was carried out on 12 April 2016 and was announced. At their last inspection on 4 October 2013, they were found to be meeting the standards we inspected.

Hertfordshire Domiciliary Care Services provides personal care and support to people living in their own homes and supported living accommodation. There were 48 people using the service on the day of our inspection. However, only 12 of those people were receiving a regulated activity from the service. A regulated activity is registered under the Health and Social Care Act and this service is registered for the Regulated Activity of Personal Care.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run. In this instance the registered manager was also the provider.

The service had experienced a new management structure over the past year and this had caused some instability. However, people and the staff told us that there had been improvements over past few months and it was much more settled. There were systems in place to monitor the quality of the service and additional systems were being developed to help ensure the support provided was consistent. This included implementing a system to ensure visit times were on time and for the full duration of the time allocated to people.

People told us they received care and support that met their individual needs. Staff knew people well and treated them with dignity and respect. People’s risks to their welfare were reviewed and staff knew how to recognise and respond to any allegations of abuse. Medicines were managed safely.

People were supported by sufficient numbers of staff and these were recruited through a robust process. Staff training was in the process of being updated and supervisions had commenced to help ensure staff were supported.

People were supported to make their own decisions and their choices were respected. Their views were sought and listened to and people were involved in planning their care and support.

4 October 2013

During a routine inspection

The people we spoke with said that overall, they were happy with the service they received. One person said 'The staff are helpful and support me with my activities. They take me out shopping, to theatres and bowling which I like.' Another person said 'The staff help us to look after ourselves and I have no complaints.'

We found that the provider was meeting the standards we had inspected. People and their relatives had been consented about the care and support they needed. People received care and support in line with their agreed care plans. Staff had been provided with the relevant training and support so that they were competent in their roles. There was a quality assurance system to assess and manage the quality of service.

6 August 2012

During a routine inspection

During our visit on 06 and 08 August 2012, we spoke with over ten people who use the service and they stated that they had been well looked after by a supportive, helpful and caring team of staff. They also said that they had been involved in the decision about their care packages and the support they required. One person said 'after my care plan review, I sign the care plans because I know what had been discussed in order to help me in my life'. Another person said ' I am looking forward to moving to my own place soon and the staff are helping with it'.