• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Castle House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

76-78 St. Botolphs Road, Barton Seagrave, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN15 6SS (01536) 522565

Provided and run by:
Vista Care Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 17 May 2022

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

As part of this inspection we looked at the infection control and prevention measures in place. This was conducted so we can understand the preparedness of the service in preventing or managing an infection outbreak, and to identify good practice we can share with other services.

Inspection team

One inspector carried out the inspection. Another inspector from the registrations team visited on the same day to undertake a location check.

Service and service type

Castle House is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing and/or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement dependent on their registration with us. Castle House is a care home without nursing care. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection

We gave a short period notice of the inspection. This was because the service is small, and people are often out. We wanted to be sure there would be people at home to speak with us.

What we did before inspection

We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return (PIR). This is information providers are required to send us annually with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make.

We used information gathered as part of a monitoring activity that took place on 16 March 2022 to help plan the inspection and inform our judgements. During this monitoring activity we spoke with three people and received feedback from four relatives.

We contacted the Local Authority and Healthwatch. Healthwatch is an independent consumer champion that gathers and represents the views of the public about health and social care services in England. This information helps support our inspections. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

We communicated with five people who used the service and received personal care. We spoke with one person that did not receive personal care that wished to share their care experience with us. We spoke with four relatives about their experience of the care provided.

Some people were not able to fully communicate their experiences of care verbally, but used different ways of communicating such as pictures, gestures and their body language. We used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI) and spent time observing people. SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us.

We spoke with six members of staff including the registered manager, business development manager and four care staff. We spoke with a healthcare professional.

We reviewed a range of records. This included four people’s care records, seven people’s personal safety plans and three medication records. We looked at three staff files in relation to recruitment and staff supervision. A variety of records relating to the management of the service, including health and safety checks and audits were reviewed.

After the inspection

We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We looked at policies and procedures, training data and quality assurance records. We spoke with one health professional who has frequent involvement with the service.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 17 May 2022

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

About the service

Castle House is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care. It is registered to support up to 10 people with a learning disability or autistic spectrum disorder. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection there were nine people using the service, seven of these people received personal care.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Right Support

People were supported by staff to pursue their interests and to achieve their aspirations and goals. The service made reasonable adjustments for people so they could be fully involved in discussions about how they received support, including support to travel wherever they needed to go.

Staff supported people to take part in activities and pursue their interests in their local area and enabled people to access specialist health and social care support in the community.

People had a choice about their living environment and were able to personalise their rooms.

Staff supported people to make decisions following best practice in decision-making. Staff communicated with people in ways that met their needs.

Right Care

There were not enough permanent staff employed at the time of the inspection. However, the service made sure staffing levels met people’s needs and kept them safe. When agency staff were used, disruption was minimised by using the same agency staff members. New staff had been recruited and were due to commence employment at Castle House shortly after the inspection.

People received kind and compassionate care. Staff protected and respected people’s privacy and dignity. They understood and responded to people’s individual needs.

Staff understood how to protect people from poor care and abuse. The service worked well with other agencies to do so. Staff had training on how to recognise and report abuse and they knew how to apply it.

Staff and people cooperated to assess risks people might face. Where appropriate, staff encouraged and enabled people to take positive risks.

People could communicate with staff and understand information given to them because staff supported them consistently and understood their individual communication needs. People could take part in activities and pursue interests that were tailored to them.

Right culture

People were supported by staff who understood best practice in relation to the wide range of strengths, impairments or sensitivities people with a learning disability and/or autistic people may have. This meant people received compassionate and empowering care that was tailored to their needs.

People and those important to them were involved in planning their care.

The service enabled people and those important to them to work with staff to develop the service. Staff valued and acted upon people’s views.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 19 May 2021).

Why we inspected

We undertook this inspection as part of a random selection of services which have had a recent Direct Monitoring Approach (DMA) assessment where no further action was needed to seek assurance about this decision and to identify learning about the DMA process.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.