• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Caretech Community Services (No 2) Limited - 44 The Avenue

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

44 The Avenue, Watford, Hertfordshire, WD17 4NS (01923) 226946

Provided and run by:
Caretech Community Services (No.2) Limited

All Inspections

3 March 2016

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced inspection on 3 March and 7 March 2016.

Caretech Community Services (No 2) Limited - 44 The Avenue provides accommodation and personal care for up to eight people with learning disabilities. At the time of the inspection, there were five people being supported by the service.

The service has a Registered Manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

There were risk assessments in place that gave guidance to staff on how risks to people could be minimised and how to safeguard people from the risk of possible harm.

The provider had effective recruitment processes in place and there were sufficient staff to support people safely. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities and would seek people’s consent before they provided any care or support. Staff received supervision and support, and had been trained to meet people’s individual needs.

People were supported by caring and respectful staff who knew them well. Relatives we spoke with had described the staff as good. People were supported to go into the community and pursue their interests.

People had been assessed, and care plans took account of their individual needs, preferences, and choices. Staff supported people to access health and social care services when required.

The provider had a formal process for handling complaints and concerns. They encouraged feedback from people and acted on the comments received to continually improve the quality of the service. The provider also had effective quality monitoring processes in place to ensure that they were meeting the required standards of care.

31 May 2013

During a routine inspection

During our site visit, we met five people using the service. They were not able to communicate with us verbally. However, their facial expressions and their general appearance showed that they were contented and well cared for. We noted that two of the people had gone shopping in the morning, accompanied by members of staff from the outreach team from another provider. A member of staff had accompanied another person for their walking exercise. Two other people were spending the day at their respective day centres. We noted one other person had lunch out in the local restaurant, again accompanied by a member of staff. These activities showed that people's needs were met by staff supporting them in their daily routine and in their choice of activities.

We spoke with three visiting professionals who gave positive feedback about the staff and the care provided. One told us, 'The staff are kind and welcoming. They keep us well informed of any changes in the person's care needs.' Another told us, 'The staff communicate well with us about each person's care needs. This helps us when we accompany people to their various community activities.' This view was echoed by another professional.

We noted that staff had knowledge of people's care needs and gave them appropriate support. We found that confidential records had been maintained and kept securely.

8 November 2012

During a routine inspection

During our site visit, we met all seven people using the service. Five of the people were not able to communicate with us verbally but their smiles and general appearance indicated that they were cared for appropriately. People were relaxed and content. A person who was able to communicate verbally said that they were happy and that the staff were good to them.

Another person showed us their bedroom, which was clean and tidy. They offered us some chocolates that they kept in their bedroom. A member of staff explained to us that the person's family had given them the chocolates. We noted other personal items on display in their bedroom, reflecting the person's lifestyle. This showed that the staff had encouraged the person's individuality and self-expression.

We observed a member of staff accompanying two people to the local video shop to hire a video for the evening activity, which was 'movie night'. A member of staff showed us the daily activity programme on the notice board. We were told that people also attend their respective day centres and undertake other outdoor activities during the day such as going shopping or going to the leisure centre. This showed that people had been given choices, and their wishes and preferences had been respected.

We observed that staff interacted well with people. We spoke with all three members of staff, and noted that they had knowledge of each person's needs, and gave support and assistance accordingly.

31 January 2012

During a routine inspection

During our site visit, we met some of the people using the service. They were happy and relaxed. A person present was able to communicate with us with gestures such as a smile, and expressed excitement as they mentioned a friend's name repeatedly. A member of staff explained to us that the person was getting ready to meet this friend on the morning of our site visit.

During this review, we spoke to a relative who commented that the person

'loves this home' and that the person 'is well looked after.' The same relative added, 'I visit every two weeks. The home is spotlessly clean. There is a good standard of hygiene.' The same relative commented that the staff 'are wonderful. They are very helpful.'

A relative we spoke with confirmed that people were 'given choices of menu and the food is good 'and that the person 'has his clothes changed and is shaved to perfection.' The same relative said, 'I attended the yearly CPA meeting. I am very satisfied with the care given.'