• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Willow House DCA

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

101 Countess Road, Amesbury, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP4 7AT (01980) 622220

Provided and run by:
Mrs Sharon Anne Arnott

All Inspections

8 November 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 8 November 2015 and was unannounced. The last inspection took place on 16 January 2014 and no breaches of legal requirements were found at this time.

Willow House Domiciliary Care Agency provides personal care to one person with a learning disability in their own home. There was a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People’s rights were protected in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. People’s capacity was considered in decisions being made about their care and support and best interest decisions were made when necessary.

Staffing levels were sufficient and flexible to meet the person’s needs. Staff work on a one to one basis for 14 hours per day, together with electronic monitoring systems at night to ensure the person remained safe. Therefore sufficient numbers of staff were always available to support the person’s individual needs safely.

Safe recruitment procedures were in place. The provider ensured checks were made on staff’s suitability to work with people. The person who used the service was also involved in the recruitment process of staff by being present and asking any questions they wanted to ask.

People were supported by staff who were kind and caring in their approach and were treated with dignity and respect. This was confirmed by the observations we made during our inspection.

People had choice about their daily activities. People were involved in their support planning and chose what activities they wanted to undertake on a weekly basis.

The provider had ensured that staff had the knowledge and skills they needed to carry out their roles effectively. Regular training was provided and staff we spoke with were knowledgeable about people’s needs.

The person we spoke with told us they received a good quality of care and support and was able to tell us who they would tell if they felt they didn’t. The person felt confident in who they could talk to if they had concerns.

The service was well led. Staff spoke highly of the management team and the vision of the service. There was a positive attitude amongst staff towards their work and staff responded well to the direction of the management team. A detailed system was in place to monitor the quality of the service that people received. This included a system to manage people’s complaints.

16 January 2014

During a routine inspection

We found that staff consulted with people who used the service in order to gain their consent. People's health and welfare needs were being met and they were happy about the support provided.

Staff recruitment procedures were robust and staff were available in sufficient numbers and were experienced and knowledgeable; ensuring that they were able to meet the needs of people using the service. We found the management of medicines to be safe and appropriate to people's needs.

The quality of the service was being monitored and systems were in place to meet people's health, welfare and safety needs.

17 January 2013

During a routine inspection

The service was being provided to two people. We were able to meet one of them. They felt the support they received helped them to live an independent life. They told us they chose what social activities they pursued, what food they bought and how they organised their time. With regard to meal preparation, they told us 'I do the bits I can.' They said all their support workers understood their needs and preferences.

Care plans were linked to risk assessments and were person centred. Staff told us they saw it as a shared responsibility of all the staff group to ensure care plans remained up to date in reflecting people's care needs and how to meet them.

The person we spoke with told us the support staff 'help me keep safe.' They told us the manager called on them every week to check on the quality of service they received. They said 'I would ask for a meeting about any problems.' We saw that both people who received a service, and their relatives, had given positive feedback through the service's own quality monitoring process.

Staff we spoke with were clear about how they would respond to any suspicion of abuse. The manager or a senior member of staff was available on call at all times. Staff told us they felt continuously involved in the service and saw their views and ideas as valued.

All staff received regular individual supervision and annual appraisals. Each member of staff, including the manager, had a personal training plan.