• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Pilgrim Homes - Finborough Court

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Pilgrims Way, Great Finborough, Stowmarket, Suffolk, IP14 3AY 0300 303 1450

Provided and run by:
Pilgrim Homes

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

14 October 2014

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 14 October 2014 and was unannounced. The last inspection of this service took place on 08 August 2013 when no breaches of regulations were found.

Finborough Court provides care and accommodation for up to 22 people. Finborough Court specialises in the care of older people including people living with dementia.

There was a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff interacted with people who lived at their home in a caring and professional way. People were supported to attend religious services if they wished to do so. Staff talked with people individually and in groups using photographs to stimulate memories.

People living at the service, staff and visitors described the management of the service as open and approachable.

People who used the service felt safe and secure Most people who used the service felt that it could do with a few more staff. Whilst staff addressed their needs, they did not always have time to chat.

Call bells were answered very quickly. Where people had limited mobility, their call bell had been placed very close to them and within easy reach.

People had their mental health and physical needs monitored. However It was not clear from the care plans how often people with diabetes were having their blood glucose levels monitored.

Staff had received training in how to recognise and report abuse. Staff spoken with, were all confident that any allegations made would be fully investigated to ensure people were protected.

The service provided training in the form of an induction to new staff and comprehensive on-going training to existing staff. The senior staff of the service were knowledgeable with regard to Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). The service had made referrals and worked with the Local authority to support people who used the service with regard to (MCA) and (DoLS)

People who used the service were content with the meals and Staff supported people with their food and fluid intake. We saw that risk assessments and resulting plans of care had been recorded in the individuals care record.

People who used the service were consulted about the way in which the service should provide activities for people.

8 August 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with three people who used the service and four members of staff as part of this inspection. People who used the service told us that they were happy with the care they received and that they felt safe. One person said, 'The staff are nice and always smile, in fact we often have a joke together.' We were told about the induction loop system which helped some people with hearing difficulties to join in group activities and the regular services of worship.

People told us the food was well cooked and of a very good standard. One person said, 'there is always something I like and we have fish and chips on Fridays.'

We found that the service was meeting the personal, emotional and healthcare needs of people who used the service. The environment was maintained safely, care plans were well documented and up to date and the service carefully sought the person's consent at every opportunity.

30 November 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with six people who used the service. People told us that they liked living in Finborough Court. One person said 'It's lovely here. It's a happy place to live.' Another person said, 'Staff are as good as gold. I couldn't be safer.'

Care records were comprehensive and showed the focus of care on providing a safe environment where dignity and independence were promoted. People told us they could choose to attend a range of activities and events. People were supported to attend religious services at local churches if they wished.

The provider had effective quality systems in place. We saw that the provider used comments from people who lived in the service, relatives, other volunteer visitors and staff to make improvements to the service. People who lived in the service were regularly given the opportunity to provide feedback. We saw that this was acted upon to make the improvements that people wanted.