• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Glengariff

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

59 Moss Lane, Pinner, Middlesex, HA5 3AZ (020) 8866 0921

Provided and run by:
D E & J Spanswick-Smith

All Inspections

19 May 2015

During a routine inspection

This unannounced inspection of Glengariff took place on the 19 May 2015. Glengariff is a care home registered to provide personal care and accommodation for 16 people. The service provides personal care and support to older people some of whom have dementia care needs. On the day of our visit there were ten people living in the home.

At our last inspection on 11 October 2013, we found the provider met the regulations we inspected.

There was a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Some medicines were not stored in line with current and relevant regulations and guidance. Staff handling medicines had completed training. However, it was not evident from records that staff had been assessed as competent to administer medicines to people in the home or that staff had received regular reviews of their knowledge, skills and competencies relating to managing and administering medicines safely.

Throughout our visit staff interacted with people in a friendly and courteous manner. People were very complimentary about the staff. They told us staff were approachable, listened to them and were kind. Our observations and the records we looked at reflected the positive comments people made.

People told us staff respected their privacy and they received the support they needed to maintain good health. People’s health was monitored and they received the advice and treatment they required from a range of health professionals.

People told us they felt safe. Staff understood how to safeguard the people they supported. Care plans and risk assessments included specific details of people’s individual needs. People were protected, as far as possible by a robust staff recruitment system.

Staff received a range of relevant training and were supported to obtain qualifications related to their work. Staff were positive about working in the home, understood people’s needs and worked as a team to provide people with the support and care they sought and needed. Staff told us they received the support they needed from the registered manager to enable them to carry out their roles and responsibilities. Most staff had worked in the home for several years so people received consistency of care. People using the service spoke highly about the staff and said they were approachable, kind and listened to them.

People had the opportunity to participate in a range of activities of their choice. Staff respected people’s decision when they chose not to participate in an arranged activity. When people wanted to maintain contact with family, friends and others important to them this was encouraged and supported by staff.

People told us they enjoyed the meals and were provided with an alternative if they wished. We saw the dining experience was relaxed and social. People’s nutritional needs were assessed and monitored closely.

The registered manager knew about the legal requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Staff had an understanding of the systems in place to protect people who were unable to make particular decisions about their care, treatment and other aspects of their lives. Staff knew a restriction on people’s freedom needed to be lawfully authorised.

There were systems in place to monitor the care and welfare of people and improve the quality of the service.

We found a breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (regulated Activities) Regulations 2010. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

11 October 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with five people who used the service and two members of staff including the manager. We also spoke with two people who had friends and family who used the service. All the people we spoke with said they were very happy with the service. One person told us, "The staff are absolutely fabulous and my room is really lovely." One person commented on having the chance to have their pet with them, telling us, "My cat is here with me and I am very lucky."

We saw that peoples' preferences were respected and they were allowed some privacy and quiet. Care records showed up to date care plans and relevant information for likes and dislikes which demonstrated support for them as individuals.

People who used the service their representatives and staff were consulted about their views and informed via various methods on the services provided and how to complain and feedback. One person visiting at the time said she was very happy to bring up any issues with the staff or manager and they were dealt with promptly.

There were enough staff with the right skills and experience to meet people's needs. Staff told us they felt supported and one care worker said to us, "I really enjoy working here it is good." Staff said they had been trained in areas related to their work.

We found the service to be well organised with a comprehensive and consistent system of records both for those that used the service and for the staff that worked for the home.

28 March 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We spoke with four people who use the service and three members of staff including the manager.

All the people we spoke with said they were happy with the food and drink that were provided. Comments included that the food was "excellent" and they had "no complaints". People felt they had a limited amount of choice and variety of food. One person commented that they got nothing "spicy" and another said "we don't get curries". People were provided nutritious food and kept hydrated within their dietary needs. There was a choice of food and drink but this was not as varied as some people wanted. People were normally supported to ensure they ate sufficient amounts of food. However sometimes people were not supported as much as they needed.

30 July 2012

During a themed inspection looking at Dignity and Nutrition

People told us what it was like to live at this home and described how they were treated by staff and their involvement in making choices about their care. They also told us about the quality and choice of food and drink available. This was because this inspection was part of a themed inspection programme to assess whether older people living in care homes are treated with dignity and respect and whether their nutritional needs are met.

The inspection team was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector joined by an Expert by Experience who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of service.

Some people told us that they were not able to go out to the local shops unless they were escorted by relatives, friends or a member of staff. One person said that when they first came to the home they had asked to go out for a walk but was not allowed to unless a carer went with them and they had never asked again. Another person said that they would like someone to take them to do a proper shop. This person told us that they were referring to wanting to go out on a shopping trip for a day rather than just to local shops.

People we spoke with told us that the food was good and well presented and that they all had enough to eat and drink. People who spoke with us said that the meals were usually the type of food that they liked.