• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Robert Owen Communities - Powderham

9 Powderham Road, Newton Abbot, Devon, TQ12 1EU (01626) 352581

Provided and run by:
Robert Owen Communities

All Inspections

5 December 2013

During a routine inspection

When we arrived at the home on 05 December 2013 we found that all the people who lived there had already or soon would be moving out. This was so that the building could be improved and extended. We were told that Robert Owen Communities (ROC) planned to keep the home registered until it was ready to be reoccupied in approximately 12 months. We were also told that the manager would remain registered during this time.

The manager told us that it had been decided to refurbish the home because people who lived there had said they wanted more bathrooms and toilets. People had raised this through their representatives on the ROC committee. This showed us that ROC consulted with and listened to the people who used the service.

Prior to our visit we had been informed by the service that a safeguarding process was in place regarding a member of staff. We discussed this at the inspection and were told that the matter had been concluded. We were told that the police were not pursuing their investigation and that the staff member had been subject to ROC disciplinary procedures.

Care workers that we spoke with knew the people they cared for well. They were able to tell us about people's likes, dislikes and particular needs. Appropriate medication adminsitration systems were in place.

We saw evidence that care workers received regular training, supervision and appraisal. We found that records were well maintained, accurate and fit for purpose.

19 March 2013

During a routine inspection

We used a number of different methods such as reviewing records, we talked to staff, people who used the service and the manager to help us understand the experiences of people using the service.

The community meeting minutes and key worker meeting minutes that we saw showed us that people's views and experiences were taken into account in the way the service was provided and delivered in relation to their care. People told us that they were happy at the home and that staff were great and that they enjoyed a variety of activities.

People experienced care, treatment and support that met their needs and protected their rights. The care plans that we looked at were person centred and documented the people's wishes in relation to how their care was provided. People that we spoke to said that the quality of care was great.

People who used the service were protected from the risk of abuse because the provider had taken reasonable steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent abuse from happening. We spoke with staff and they demonstrated an understanding of safeguarding procedures and the different types of abuse.

We observed that people were supported extremely well and that people had been able to personalise their bedrooms and other living areas to make the service welcoming and homely.

We saw that people had "My dream home" collages in place, these were person centred and really showed us that people's individual needs and preferences had been met.

19 December 2011

During a routine inspection

We spoke to people that used the service during our visit. They told us that they liked living at the home and enjoyed the activities they took part in. They also told us about how the community in their 'flat', and in the home, worked to enable everyone to have enjoyable and fulfilling lives.

The people that lived at the home mostly had good verbal communication and daily living skills. Most people went out daily to either go to work or to enjoy a wide range of activities. We saw that the service and the organisation had ensured that people had many activities to choose from so that everyone was busy and active.

The home was separated as far as possible into two 'flats', one on the ground floor and the other on the first floor. This helped to reduce the size of the overall group and enabled people to enjoy a smaller group lifestyle. However the whole home did come together as a community at times. The people that used the service were thoroughly involved and consulted about how the service worked.

While we were visiting we saw that the staff spoke respectfully to people, using people's preferred names. The staff delivered support with patience and care and had a detailed knowledge of the needs of the people that lived at the home.

We heard and read about how people's mostly limited personal care and health care needs were met by the service. People's care documentation was being redeveloped but there was a lot of good information about the person centred planning of peoples care and support, and the fulfilling lives that people were enjoying.

The staff received appropriate training and support from the provider. This training and support helped staff to deliver good quality care and support.