• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Rainbow Trust Children's Charity 1

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Forster House, Forster Business Centre, Finchale Road, Newton Hall, Durham, DH1 5HL (0191) 332 4085

Provided and run by:
Rainbow Trust Children's Charity

All Inspections

23 February 2014

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 23 February 2015 and was announced. The registered provider was given 48 hours’ notice because the location provides personal care and support to children and their families; we needed to be sure that someone would be in.

We last inspected this service in January 2014. At the time of our last inspection the service was meeting our regulatory standards.

The Rainbow Trust is a national organisation providing services to children and their families across the UK. Rainbow Trust 1 in County Durham offers services to children and families where children have life threatening or terminal conditions. The services works with families in hospitals, in their own homes and in the community. They provide care and support direct to the child or young person affected by a life threatening or terminal conditions, their siblings or their adult parents or carers.

The service is registered with the CQC to provide personal care to children and young people in their homes. At the time of our inspection there were 81 children receiving a service, 23 of whom required personal care. Parent’s comments on the personal care service they have received in their own home and in the community have been included in this report.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We found every child and young person had a personalised care plan and risk assessment in place. Staff were aware of risks and worked on a multi-agency basis to minimise those risks.

We found regular quality monitoring of the service had been undertaken. We saw each section of the service e.g. a siblings group or a parent support group had a service form which described the nature of the service and the service outcomes. Children and their parents were asked to contribute to the evaluation of the service.

We found the registered manager had mapped where staff lived and had considered the distances to maximise the hours staff could spend with families.

We found the registered provider worked within the principles outlined in the Common Assessment Framework to make plans and decisions involving the child or young person and in their best interests.

We found the registered provider involved children and young people and worked within the UN Convention on Children’s Rights.

The registered provider had put in place a ‘Tribute Day’ and invited families along who had lost a child through illness or disability. People had been asked for their feedback to improve the day.

Professionals who referred to the service told us the service was very responsive to families and provided a flexible service to meet individual family’s needs.

We also found Rainbow Trust 1 adhered to the NICE quality standard QS55 ‘Children and young people with cancer, and their families and carers, have their psychological and social needs assessed at different stages during and after their treatment'.

15 January 2014

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two parents about their experiences of using the service and a relative of another. All spoke positively of their experiences of using the service, and told us how valuable they found the service was to them. Comments included, "I have nothing but praise for them. It has been a very positive experience. I would thoroughly recommend them"; "They've made a big difference to their lives at a very difficult time."; and, "It's fantastic and has been invaluable."

Information was provided to families to help them understand the type of support available, so they could make informed choices. We found the provider had processes in place to gain the valid consent of families that used the service. However processes to gain the consent of children had not been considered.

Care and treatment was planned and delivered in a way that was intended to ensure people's safety and welfare.

People were protected from the risk of infection because appropriate guidance had been followed.

The provider had a robust recruitment procedure in place to protect the people who used the service.

The provider had an effective system to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that people received.

21 November 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke to the parents of some of the children the agency supported and they were very positive about the care provided. Comments included;" Absolutely fantastic, they made things much easier" "They understand and I trust them."

People were given the opportunity to express their views and were involved in making decisions about their care and treatment. People's diversity, values and human rights were respected.

People who use the service were protected from the risk of abuse, because the provider had taken reasonable steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent abuse from happening.

10 February 2011

During a routine inspection

The unit gave out family support questionnaires and the evaluation showed that service users and their carers were positive about the support provided.

One service user commented " X has been very understanding and has listened to me and had helped us all."