• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Lifeways Community Care (Croydon)

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

77 Park Lane, Croydon, Surrey, CR0 1JG (020) 8688 7666

Provided and run by:
Lifeways Community Care Limited

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

27 May and 9 June 2015

During a routine inspection

We inspected Lifeways Community Care offices in Croydon on 27 May 2015 and visited people using the service on 9 June 2015. The inspection was announced 48 hours in advance.

Lifeways Community Care is a service which provides personal care to adults who live in supported living accommodation in London and the South East. At the time of our visit there were 45 people using the service, many of who had complex health and communication needs.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they were safe. Staff had good knowledge about how to identify abuse and report any concerns. People had risk assessments but these were inadequate and did not give staff sufficient information on how to manage the risks identified. Some people’s risk assessments had not been reviewed or updated since the initial assessment.

Staff arrived on time and stayed for the allotted time. People were cared for by a sufficient number of suitable staff to help keep them safe and meet their needs. Staff were recruited using an effective procedure which was consistently applied.

There were appropriate arrangements in place for the ordering, storing, administration and recording of medicines. People told us they received their medicines safely.

Staff knew the people they were caring for well and people were satisfied with the quality of care they received. However we were concerned that people’s needs were not regularly reviewed. Their care plans were not always up to date and therefore might not reflect their current needs.

Staff were not adequately supported by the provider to deliver effective care. Staff did not receive regular training, supervision or appraisal. Some staff did not receive an induction to make sure they had the skills they needed before they started to work at the service.

The registered manager and some staff had received training in the relevant requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and understood how it applied to people in their care.

Staff supported people to have a nutritious, well balanced diet. Staff worked with a variety of healthcare professionals to support people to maintain good health. However, people’s health action plans and hospital passports were either incomplete or were not updated. This meant there was a risk that external healthcare professions would not be fully aware of people’s health conditions, current medication or communication needs.

People told us and we observed that they were treated with respect and staff were kind and caring. People were supported to be as independent as they wanted to be. Staff encouraged and supported people to have advocates.

Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. People felt able to contact the service’s office to discuss their care. The registered manager was recently appointed and had worked in the adult social care sector for many years. They understood what was necessary to provide a quality service and had started to implement their plans to improve the service. Staff felt supported by the registered manager.

There were systems in place to assess and monitor the quality of care people received which had identified some but not all areas of the service which required improvement. Where areas for improvement had been identified an action plan was in place which the management and staff were beginning to implement.

We found breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 in relation to how the provider assessed people’s needs, supported staff and managed the service. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report.

19 March 2014

During a routine inspection

At our previous inspection in November 2013 we identified that action needed to be taken by the service provider to improve care planning and support provided to people who used the service. We also found that improvements were required to do with the training, support and development of it's staff. During our follow up visit we found that appropriate action had been taken by the provider to address our concerns to do with staff training and supervision.

The registered manager told us that Lifeways policy to do with staff training and staff supervision had been revised since the last inspection and new practice implemented. We were told by the manager that staff now received individual and regular supervision and that staff have attended appropriate training. Staff told us that they now received improved supervision and improved access to training. We saw evidence that demonstrated that staff had been on appropriate and relevant training since the last inspection.

26 November 2013

During a routine inspection

The people who we spoke with said they were very happy that they could live in their own homes and get appropriate support to enable them to do so as independently as possible. One person said of staff, 'They encourage us to do things for ourselves but if we really need help they give it to us'.

People told us that they got on with their support workers and found them helpful. We saw that people were very relaxed with the staff who supported them. Those support workers who we spoke with were all able to describe how they supported people living in the supported living units and how the support plans were useful in helping them to do this.

Staff training records that we examined indicated that the provision of further training for support workers after their induction was poor and could be improved. All of the staff who we spoke with told us that the staff training programme needed improving. When we looked at the records we found that not all staff had received an annual appraisal.

As part of the quality assurance programme we were told that satisfaction or feedback surveys were circulated every year to people with an interest in the service, so that a broad range of feedback could be obtained about how the agency was performing. One person said, 'Everything is good about my support'; someone else said, 'Being able to get the help when I need it is very helpful'.

4 February 2013

During a routine inspection

The people who we spoke to said they were very happy that they could live in their own homes and get enough support to enable them to be as independent as possible. One person said, 'I love living here, we get support from the staff where we need it but we are able to do a lot of the things we want to do on our own'. Another person said, 'I see my family when I want to, they are not far away, but I live here as independently as I can. I get support from the staff when ever I need it'.

People knew about their care plans and they told us that they had been involved in drawing them up. They said that they felt safe and well looked after; they liked the style of group living because they said they were with their friends.

15 September 2011

During an inspection in response to concerns

As part of this review we visited supported living services in Kent and the Lifeways Community Care office in Croydon. We found that the people who use the services we visited had complex needs and many were not able to communicate verbally. We were shown rooms with the agreement of people who live at the services. All rooms had been individually decorated, with personal photographs on display, and furnished to a high standard. Staff explained that the colour schemes and furniture had been chosen by people living at the services.

We spoke to some people in supported living services and they indicated they were happy with their care.

Person centred plans were kept in people's own rooms.