You are here

We are carrying out a review of quality at Positive Horizons Limited. We will publish a report when our review is complete. Find out more about our inspection reports.

Inspection Summary


Overall summary & rating

Good

Updated 25 January 2017

Positive Horizons Limited provides personal care and support to people who live in their own homes in Derbyshire.

We carried out this inspection on 6 December 2016. It was an announced inspection, which meant the provider knew we would be visiting. This was because we wanted to make sure the registered manager, or someone who could act on their behalf, would be available to talk with us.

At our last inspection on 13 May 2013, we found the service was meeting all standards assessed. It was compliant with the regulations and no concerns were identified.

A registered manager was in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff were appropriately recruited, trained and supported. They had undergone a comprehensive induction programme and, where necessary, had received additional training specific to the needs of the people they were supporting. Communication was effective and regular meetings were held to discuss issues and share best practice. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities and spoke enthusiastically about the work they did and the people they cared for.

The provider had detailed policies and procedures relating to medicines management. Staff understanding and competency regarding the management of medicines was subject to regular monitoring checks and medicines training was updated appropriately.

Staff knew the people they were supporting and provided a personalised service and used effective systems for gaining consent. Individual care plans, based on a full assessment of need, were in place detailing how people wished to be supported. This helped ensure that personal care was provided in a structured and consistent manner. Risk assessments were also in place to effectively identify and manage potential risks.

Where people lacked the mental capacity to make decisions the home was guided by the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) to ensure any decisions were made in the person’s best interests.

Systems were in place to effectively monitor the safety and quality of the service and to gather the views and experiences of people and their relatives. The service was flexible and responded positively to people’s changing needs and any issues or concerns raised. People and their relatives told us they were confident that any concerns they might have would be listened to, taken seriously and acted upon.

Inspection areas

Safe

Good

Updated 25 January 2017

The service was safe.

Risks relating to people’s care and support were assessed and appropriately managed. People were protected by safe recruitment procedures which helped ensure they received care and support from suitable staff. Medicines were managed effectively by staff who had received the necessary training to help ensure safe practice.

Effective

Good

Updated 25 January 2017

The service was effective.

Staff knew individuals well and understood how they wanted their personal care to be given. People who use the service and their relatives were happy with the care and support provided. Staff were aware of their responsibilities under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and, where appropriate, decisions were made in people's best interests.

Caring

Good

Updated 25 January 2017

The service was caring.

Staff were kind, patient and compassionate and treated people with dignity and respect. People were involved in making decisions about their care. As far as practicable they were consulted about their choices and preferences and these were reflected in the personalised care and support they received.

Responsive

Good

Updated 25 January 2017

The service was responsive.

Individual care and support needs were regularly assessed and monitored, to ensure that any changes were accurately reflected in the care and treatment people received. Personalised care plans detailed how people wished to be supported and their care reflected their individual needs, preferences and choices. A complaints procedure was in place and people were able to raise any issues or concerns.

Well-led

Good

Updated 25 January 2017

The service was well led.

There was an open and inclusive culture. Staff felt valued and supported by the management. They were aware of their responsibilities and competent and confident in their individual roles. Accidents, incidents and risks were closely monitored to identify trends and help ensure lessons were learned and necessary improvements made. The management regularly checked and audited the quality of care and support provided, to help drive service improvement and ensure people’s needs were met.