• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Athelstan House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

42 Hanworth Road, Feltham, Middlesex, TW13 5AY (020) 8581 5576

Provided and run by:
P M Harrington and Mrs R W Harrington

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

17 and 18 November 2014

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 17 and 18 November 2014 and was an unannounced inspection. The last inspection took place on 29 and 30 November 2013 and the provider was compliant with the regulations we checked.

Athelstan House is registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to five adults. The service supports people with learning disabilities who may also have a physical disability. At the time of the inspection the home had no vacancies.

The registered manager has worked at the service for several years. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.’

People were happy with the service and we received positive feedback from people, relatives and visiting health and social care professionals, who felt the service was well run and people’s changing needs were identified and met. Staff supported people in a gentle and calm manner, respecting their privacy and dignity.

Recruitment records were not always completed in full, which means recruitment procedures were not being followed and this could place people at risk.

Staff had received training and demonstrated an understanding of people’s individual choices and needs and how to meet them.

Staff understood safeguarding and whistleblowing procedures and were clear about the process to follow to report concerns. Complaints procedures were in place and relatives were confident to raise any issues they might have, so they could be addressed.

Overall medicines were being well managed and people were receiving their medicines as prescribed. Good practice points were discussed and the manager was receptive and said they would be addressed.

We found the service to be meeting the requirements of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA).

Care records reflected people’s needs and interests and were kept up to date. Communication between the manager and the staff was effective and they were all up to date with people’s care and support needs.

The manager kept up to date with new information and sought out new experiences that could benefit people using the service. Systems were in place to monitor the quality of the service.

We found a breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

29, 30 November 2013

During a routine inspection

We spent time with 4 people using the service. We used a number of different methods to help us understand the experiences of people using the service, because the people using the service had complex needs which meant they were not able to tell us their experiences. We spoke to the relatives of 2 people, 2 support workers and 1 social care professional. Relatives told us they were happy with the care and support people received at Athelstan House. Their comments included 'it's more like a family home than a care home. We're very pleased.' Another relative said 'it's a good home, they understand [my relative] and he's looked after very well.'

We looked at the care plans for four people using the service. We saw the plans detailed people's care needs and the support their care workers should provide. The plans were updated regularly and people were involved in reviewing the care they received.

The provider had policies and procedures for managing people's prescribed medicines. Support workers understood the procedures and had received training to enable them to make sure people received the medication they needed.

We looked at the staff recruitment and training records for four support workers. The provider carried out necessary pre-employment checks but not all staff had received refresher training for food hygiene.

There were procedures in place to respond to any complaints received from people using the service or other people. There had been no formal complaints since our last inspection in March 2013.

1 March 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We found at our previous visit 17 November and 19 November 2012 that people did not have their care appropriately assessed and planned which placed them at risk of receiving care which was inappropriate or unsafe. We also found that records relating to the management of the service were not fit for purpose.

We requested following our visit the provider send us an action plan telling us how improvements would be made. We carried out an inspection on 1 March 2013 to ensure improvements had been made and standards were being met.

We looked at the care records of two people, spoke with two members of staff and two people who use the service. People who use the service told us they were happy living at the home and improvements had been made. One person told us "staff help me with cooking and cleaning, they also support me to be involved in community activities."

We found that care assessments and care planning had improved. Staff working in the home were able to tell us how people were supported to ensure their needs were met.

We also found that records relating to the management of the home had also improved. There was for example staffing rota's available that reflected who was working in the home.

17, 19 November 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with three people who use the service, looked at the care records of two people and spoke with three members of staff during our visit. We found that people were involved in the planning of their care and were also involved in the running of the service. Three people told us " I like living here". We found that staff encouraged people to be independent where they could for example attend to their own personal care as well as make drinks and snacks for themselves.

We found that care and treatment was not always planned appropriately. For example care plans and risk assessments were not always in place for people who were at risk of seizures whilst out in the community. We also found there was an absence of care plans and risk assessments where people may display behaviour that is challenging to the service.

We looked at how people's medication was managed and found there was an appropriate system. Staff had been appropriately trained and the service carried out regular audits to ensure medication had been administered correctly and was being handled safely.

We found that there was sufficient staff on duty during our visits and that staff had received appropriate training. However we did find that none of the staff working in the service had received any first aid training.

We found that records in the home were not always accurately kept. For example staffing rota's were often incomplete.

29 July 2011

During a routine inspection

The feedback we received from people who use the service was positive. People told us that they like living at the home and that they are supported to do things that they enjoy. They said that they feel well cared for at the home and that they are supported to get treatment if they need it.

People told us that staff are available when they need them and that staff treat them with respect. People said they like the food provided at the home and that they are able to make choices about what they eat. They said that the home is kept clean and tidy and that they can have privacy when they want it

People told us that they feel safe living at the home. None of the people we spoke to had made a complaint about the service but they told us that they would feel comfortable in doing so if they were not happy about something.