• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Beech Grove Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

St Paul's Street, Low Moor, Clitheroe, Lancashire, BB7 2LS (01200) 426057

Provided and run by:
Roseberry Care Centres UK Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

30 January 2015 and 2 February 2015

During a routine inspection

We carried out an inspection of Beech Grove Care Home on 30 January 2015 and 2 February 2015. The first day was unannounced. We last inspected Beech Grove on 26 November 2013 and found the service was meeting the current regulations.

The home is registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to 33 older people. At the time of the inspection 32 people were accommodated in the home. The home is located in a residential area near to the centre of Clitheroe. Accommodation is provided on two floors in 31 bedrooms and one shared bedroom. 13 of the bedrooms have an ensuite facility.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they felt safe and were well cared for in the home. Staff knew about safeguarding and we saw concerns had been dealt with appropriately, which helped to keep people safe.

As Beech Grove is registered as a care home, CQC is required by law to monitor the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and to report on what we find. We found appropriate mental capacity assessments had been carried out and applications had been made to the local authority for a DoLS. Staff had completed training and had a working knowledge of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Staff had been trained to handle medication and records gave detailed information about people’s medication requirements. Records and audits were in place which ensured people received their medication in a safe manner.

We found staff recruitment to be thorough and all relevant checks had been completed before a member of staff started to work in the home. Staff had completed relevant training for their role and they were well supported by the management team.

Staff were aware of people’s nutritional needs and made sure they supported people to have a healthy diet, with choices of a good variety of food and drink.

People had opportunities to participate in a variety of activities and we observed staff actively interacting with people throughout our visit. All people spoken with told us the staff were caring, compassionate and kind. We saw that staff were respectful and made sure people’s privacy and dignity were maintained. People and their relatives spoke positively about the home and the care they or their relatives received.

All people had a detailed care plan which covered their needs and any personal preferences. We saw the plans had been reviewed and updated at regular intervals. This meant staff had up to date information about people’s needs and wishes.

All people, their relatives and staff spoken with had confidence in the registered manager and felt the home had clear leadership. We found there were effective systems to assess and monitor the quality of the service, which included feedback from people living in the home.

26 November 2013

During a routine inspection

People spoken with were satisfied with the service provided, one person told us, 'It's 100 per cent, I can't find any faults at all' and another person said, 'I like all the staff, they are all very helpful'. People told us their rights to privacy, dignity and independence were upheld and respected.

People's care was planned and delivered in accordance with their needs. We found people had individual care plans which were supported by risk assessments and daily care records.

We conducted a tour of the premises and noted people were provided with a well maintained and comfortable environment. Appropriate arrangements were in place for routine repairs and maintenance.

Appropriate checks were undertaken when new staff started working for the service.

There were effective systems in place to monitor and assess the quality of the service. People were asked their opinion of the service on a regular basis and were given the opportunity to complete a customer satisfaction questionnaire. This meant people were able to have input into the development of the service.

26 November 2012

During a routine inspection

People were satisfied with the service provided, one person told us, 'It's very nice here and I feel well looked after' and another person said the home was 'very good'. People told us their rights to privacy, dignity and independence were upheld and respected.

People's care was planned and delivered in accordance with their needs. People had individual care plans which were supported by a series of risk assessments and daily care records. This meant people's care could be readily monitored and evaluated.

Staff had an understanding of safeguarding vulnerable adult procedures and knew who to contact in the event of a concern.

Suitable arrangements were in place to manage medication.

Staff were provided with appropriate training opportunities and received regular supervision.

There was a policy, procedure and system in place for dealing with any complaints.

31 October 2011

During a routine inspection

People told us they were happy living in the home and they were consulted about the way they wished their care to be delivered. They said they were able to express their views and their opinions were taken seriously and acted upon. One person said, 'I am very happy here, everyone is caring, helpful and attentive'. People spoken with felt they were well cared for and the staff respected their rights to privacy, dignity and independence. People were supported to participate in a variety of activities both inside and outside the home.

People made positive comments about the staff team and felt they could talk to the any of the staff or the manager if they had a problem or query. People were asked if they were satisfied with the quality of the service provided and were given the opportunity to complete satisfaction questionnaires and attend residents' meetings.