The Care Quality Commission
  • Doctor
  • GP practice

Carshalton Fields Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

11 Crichton Road, Carshalton, Surrey, SM5 3LS (020) 8643 3030

Provided and run by:
Dr Maria Patrocinia Desa

Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Carshalton Fields Surgery on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Carshalton Fields Surgery, you can give feedback on this service.

11 January 2020

During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Carshalton Fields Surgery on 11 January 2020. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

2 November 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Carshalton Fields Surgery on 2 November 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the duty of candour.

The areas where the provider should make improvement are:

  • Strengthen infection control arrangements (ensure the lead person has appropriate regular training and that all actions are followed up) and the checks of emergency equipment (to include defibrillator pads).

  • Review the procedure for maintaining staff files and training records to ensure that they are complete.

  • Continue to improve care for patients with long term conditions, particularly patients with diabetes and high cholesterol.

  • Develop a system to monitor prescription form usage.

  • Review how patients with caring responsibilities are identified and recorded on the clinical system to ensure information, advice and support is made available to them.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice