• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Castlethorpe Nursing Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Castlethorpe, Brigg, South Humberside, DN20 9LG (01652) 654551

Provided and run by:
Castlethorpe Nursing Home

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

4th and 7th December 2015

During a routine inspection

We carried out this unannounced inspection over two days, on 4 and 7 December 2015. The service was last inspected on 09 January 2014 when it was found to be compliant with the regulations inspected.

Castlethorpe Nursing Home provides residential and nursing care for up to 59 people, some of whom may be living with dementia. Rooms are on two floors connected by a passenger lift. The home has three main lounge areas as well as a conservatory with views of the local countryside. At the time of our inspection there were 46 people using the service.

We found the registered manager for the service had resigned from their post earlier on in the year and an acting manager had been appointed to cover this post one month prior to our inspection. The acting manager was currently in the process of completing their application for their skills and competencies to be formally assessed by the Care Quality Commission. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Assessments of people were carried out about known risks to ensure they were protected from potential harm. Training was provided for staff to ensure they knew how to safeguard people from potential abuse and checks were carried out of new staff before they were employed to ensure they were safe to work with people who used the service. Staffing levels were monitored to ensure there were sufficient numbers available for meeting people’s needs. People received their medicines from staff who had been trained on the safe handling and administration of medication. The building was clean and well maintained.

Staff were provided with training and development opportunities to help them develop their careers and enable them to effectively carry out their roles. Staff involved people and obtained their consent before carrying out interventions and best interest meetings were held when people lacked the capacity to make important decisions for themselves. People received a choice of nourishing home cooked meals which they said they enjoyed and community based health care professionals told us they had a good working relationship with the service.

People were supported by staff who demonstrated courtesy and consideration for the importance of maintaining their dignity and wishes for privacy. People’s private records and information was maintained in a confidential manner

People were provided with a range of opportunities for social stimulation and interaction. A complaints policy was in place to ensure people could raise any concerns about the service when required. People and their relatives were involved in the planning of their support that was reviewed on a regular and ongoing basis.

Management feedback was provided to staff in a constructive way and meetings took place to ensure staff were aware of their professional roles and responsibilities. A range of audits were regularly carried out to enable the quality of the service to be monitored and enable the service to learn. People and their relatives were consulted to ensure they could contribute their views to help the service to develop.

9 January 2014

During a routine inspection

Where people did not have the capacity to give their consent, the provider acted in accordance with legal requirements. We saw evidence that best interest meetings had been held when a person lacked the capacity to make an informed decision themselves.

We observed the lunch time experience and saw that care was provided in a compassionate way and people were assisted at a suitable pace. Interactions with staff were positive and uplifting for people who used the service.

The provider had an audit schedule in place. We saw that infection control audits took place on a monthly basis. Amongst others, medication audits and care plan audits took place on a monthly basis. A registered nurse told us, 'Risk assessments are assessed at different intervals depending on the person; they can be done every week, every two weeks or every month.'

A person who used the service explained, 'I don't know if there is enough staff because I don't know about that sort of thing, but whenever I need someone they are always there to help me.'

The home had recently been audited by the NHS medicines service. We saw the suggested actions had been undertaken and completed satisfactorily. The registered manager told us, 'We have followed their advice and I think that it has made improvements.'

14 June 2012

During a routine inspection

People that used the service told us that staff were, "Fantastic" and did a 'Very good job." People that used the service said staff supported them, "Very well." One person told us that moving in to the home was, "The best thing I could have done." People that used the service told us they felt safe and that staff were, "Very helpful and kind'. People that used the service said staff always listened to them and that they had, 'No concerns' about the service.