• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Allied Healthcare Swindon

Overall: Inadequate read more about inspection ratings

Unit 22B, Apsley House, 50 High Street, Royal Wootton Bassett, Swindon, Wiltshire, SN4 7AQ (01793) 849800

Provided and run by:
Allied Healthcare Group Limited

All Inspections

13 April 2015

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced inspection on 13 April 2015. Allied Healthcare provides personal care services to people in their own homes. At the time of our visit the service was supporting 167 people. At our last inspection on 14 February 2013 the service was meeting the regulations inspected.

At this inspection the service did not have a registered manager. The service had been without a registered manager since December 2014. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The service was not always notifying CQC of incidents they were required to notify.

People using the service and their relatives had mixed views about the service. Some people told us the service was good. Other people said care staff were often late and sometimes did not arrive at all. Some people experienced missed visits on a regular basis. Missed visits were not monitored. People were often notified at short notice that they would not be receiving their care visit. 

People's medicines were not managed so that they received them safely. Guidance to staff was not always available about people's prescribed medicines and where information was available it was not always accurate. Records of medicine administration were not always available and the records we looked at were not always accurate. 

People’s needs had not always been assessed. Assessments we did see were not up to date. Some people's care records contained information that was significantly out of date. Staff did not have access to guidance that reflected people's needs. Risks had not always been assessed and therefore plans were not in place to reduce risks.

Systems in place to monitor the quality of service were not effective. Audits of care plans and medicines records did not identify issues found during the inspection. There was no system to monitor missed visits and prevent them. Where missed visits were identified there was no investigation of the cause.

An action plan developed by the management team did not address all of the concerns identified during the inspection.  

Care staff, who visited people in their homes, had a caring attitude and people were complimentary about care staff supporting them. Care staff received regular supervision. People did not always speak positively about the support they received when calling the office.

We have made a recommendation regarding the providers responsibilities relating to the Mental Capacity Act 2005. 

We found a number of breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report.

The overall rating for this provider is 'Inadequate'. This means that it has been placed into 'Special measures' by CQC. The purpose of special measures is to:

  • Ensure that providers found to be providing inadequate care significantly improve.
  • Provide a framework within which we use our enforcement powers in response to inadequate care and work with, or signpost to, other organisations in the system to ensure improvements are made.
  • Provide a clear timeframe within which providers must improve the quality of care they provide or we will seek to take further action, for example cancel their registration.

Services placed in special measures will be inspected again within six months. If insufficient improvements have been made such that there remains a rating of inadequate for any key question or overall, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures to begin the process of preventing the provider from operating the service. This will lead to cancelling their registration or to varying the terms of their registration within six months if they do not improve. The service will be kept under review and if needed could be escalated to urgent enforcement action. Where necessary, another inspection will be conducted within a further six months, and if there is not enough improvement we will move to close the service by adopting our proposal to vary the provider’s registration to remove this location or cancel the provider’s registration.

22 November 2013

During a routine inspection

On the day we inspected, we were informed that though Allied Healthcare Lechlade and Allied Healthcare Swindon were both separate regulated activities registered with CQC; they had previously merged these two respective domiciliary care agencies and were providing one set of care to people and staff provision from one agency/office location. The provider informed CQC they would look at the respective registration options.

People who used the service and their relatives we spoke with told us they were satisfied with the care and support that was provided. We were told that staff were friendly and polite.

We spoke with three people who used the service who told us they had copies of their care plans and they explained how they were involved in reviewing and changing the content if they needed to. One person told us they had left this to their relatives to organise.

We spoke with three relatives and all said they were satisfied with the approach of the staff and that they had been involved or consulted in the planning of care.

We found that staff received regular training and that they felt they were well supported by the managers and senior staff. We found that regular spot checks were completed by senior staff and that the views of the people using the service were regularly sought.

The agency had systems in place to monitor and audit the quality of the service and sought the views of people using the service, their relatives and staff.

14 February 2013

During a routine inspection

People who used the agency and their relatives we spoke with told us they were satisfied with the care and support that was provided. We were told that staff were friendly and polite. People said that staff were punctual, wore their uniforms and provided identification.

People were provided with sufficient information about the services the agency provided and also how to raise a concern or report an issue.

We found that staff received regular training and that they felt they were well supported by the managers and senior staff. We found that regular spot checks were completed by senior staff and that the views of the people using the service were regularly sought.

Staff were provided with training in adult protection and were aware of their responsibilities to report safeguarding concerns.

The agency had systems in place to monitor and audit the quality of the service and get the views of people using the service, their relatives and staff.