• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

De Vere Care Partnership -Chelmsford

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Suite 1 & 2, First Floor, Unit 8, Kingsdale Business Centre, Regina Road, Chelmsford, CM1 1PE 0333 888 1310

Provided and run by:
De Vere Care Partnership Ltd

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of assessment: 7 July to 22 July 2026.

De Vere Care Partnership – Chelmsford is a domiciliary care agency providing care and support to people in their own homes. Not everyone using the service received personal care. CQC only inspects services where people receive personal care, which includes support with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where personal care is provided, we also consider any wider social care people receive. At the time of our inspection, the service was supporting 132 people with personal care.

This inspection was prompted by a review of the information we held about this service. As a result, we undertook a targeted inspection, we looked at safe and well lead.

inspection

Our inspection was announced. This means we gave the service 48 hours' notice prior to our visit taking place. This was because we wanted to make sure someone would be available to support us with the inspection.

The inspection team consisted of 1 inspector.

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make inspections and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

We spoke with the registered manager, and the director and received feedback from 18 staff members, 10 people and 2 relatives.

We found the provider had taken appropriate steps to improve the service since the last inspection. A service improvement plan was in place to support ongoing development.

Risk assessments and care plans were reviewed regularly, or when concerns were identified, to ensure records reflected people’s current needs and risks. Staff understood their responsibilities under the Mental Capacity Act.

The provider had systems to monitor incidents and promote learning. Staff understood safeguarding procedures and, at the time of our inspection, we saw appropriate steps had been taken to manage identified safeguarding concerns.

Systems were in place to manage people’s medicines safely. Infection risks were managed effectively, and people were supported by skilled staff.

Staff knew people well, treated them as individuals, and encouraged independence. Relatives said the service responded promptly to people’s needs. The provider promoted a positive culture through staff recognition and wellbeing initiatives.

Care was personalised and adapted to people’s changing needs, supported by consistent staffing and clear communication with people and relatives. People felt listened to, received information in accessible ways, and were supported to maintain community connections and plan for the future.

People felt safe when receiving support. They said staff listened to them, respected their choices and provided care in the way they preferred, helping them to retain choice and control. Staff were described as kind, compassionate and responsive, and people said their privacy and dignity were respected. One person said, “Staff are always kind and respect my privacy.” Another person said, “Staff listen to me, respect my choices and support me in the way I prefer.”

People spoke positively about the service and felt confident raising concerns. They believed staff and leaders would respond promptly and take appropriate action. People knew the staff and leadership team well, which helped them feel supported and reassured. One person said, “The service I receive is very good. I’m well supported, and I also feel very safe when I receive support.”

During an assessment under our new approach

De Vere Care Partnership – Chelmsford is a domiciliary care agency providing care and support to people living in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of our assessment the service supported 195 people with personal care.

We reviewed 12 quality statements; Safeguarding; Involving people to manage risks; Safe and effective staffing; Medicines optimisation; Consent to care and treatment; Assessing needs; How staff, teams and services work together; Independence, choice and control; Workforce wellbeing and enablement; Compassionate and inclusive leaders; Freedom to speak up; Governance, management and sustainability.

We found two breaches of the legal regulations in relation to safe and effective staffing and governance.

The provider’s oversight of call monitoring did not consistently demonstrate there were enough suitably qualified staff to meet people’s needs. Governance systems and audits were not effective in identifying or addressing areas for improvement.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

12 September 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

About the service

De Vere Care partnerships – Chelmsford is a domiciliary care agency providing care and support to people living in their own homes. At the time of inspection, the service was supporting 136 people.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Right Support:

The provider operated robust systems to help ensure risks to people’s safety and welfare were assessed and mitigated. People’s medicines were managed safely, and their independence with this task was promoted where possible.

The provider operated a robust audit system to enable effective oversight of the service. Staff were recruited safely and there were sufficient staff deployed to meet people's needs. There were no missed care calls and people knew who would be providing their care. Staff were appropriately inducted into the service and training was on-going throughout employment and as required.

Care plans included detailed information about the support people required. Where needed staff made appropriate referrals to other agencies and external professionals. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Right Care:

Care was person-centred and respectful and promoted people's dignity and privacy. People and their relatives told us people were well cared for. Staff had training on how to recognise and report abuse and understood how to protect people from poor care and abuse. People's care plans reflected their individual support needs.

Right Culture:

People received consistent care from a staff team who understood their individual needs. The provider’s management team led the service with an open and inclusive management style that helped to ensure people, their relatives and staff views were heard, listened to and acted upon.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 11 August 2022).

At our last inspection we recommended the provider look at best practice guidance in relation to people’s protected characteristics and how to manage people’s choices about the gender of staff providing their care. At this inspection we found the provider had acted on this recommendation and had made improvements.

Why we inspected

We received concerns in relation to staff skills and experience. As a result, we undertook a focused inspection to review the key questions of safe and well-led only. For those key questions not inspected, we used the ratings awarded at the last inspection to calculate the overall rating. We found no evidence during this inspection that people were at risk of harm from this concern. Please see the safe and well-led sections of this full report. The overall rating for the service has remained Good based on the findings of this inspection.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

This was an ‘inspection using remote technology’. This means we did not visit the office location and instead used technology such as electronic file sharing to gather information, and video and phone calls to engage with people using the service as part of this performance review and assessment.

21 July 2022

During a routine inspection

About the service

De Vere Care Partnership – Chelmsford is a domiciliary care agency providing care and support to people living in their own homes. At the time of inspection, the service was supporting nine people.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People received an assessment so care could be planned to meet their needs. People's protected characteristics such as their culture, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender and their preferred choice of gender of staff to provide their care were not integral to the assessment process.

We made a recommendation that the provider consider how to include these in their assessment process using good practice guidance.

People and their family members were very positive about their experience of using the service. There were enough staff to care for people and people were recruited safely. People were supported with their medicines as prescribed. Infection prevention and control measures were effective, including the safe management of COVID-19. Systems and processes worked to safeguard people from the risk of abuse. Learning was shared following any incidents.

Risk assessments were undertaken to ensure their safety and wellbeing. Staff received training and supervision to support them in their role. Support was given with a range of personal and practical tasks, and people’s choices and wishes were respected. People told us they were supported to access health and other services as required, such as district nurses. Consent was considered as part of the care provided.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People told us they were treated with dignity and respect. Staff were warm, kind, and considerate. People were involved in their care arrangements and were able to make decisions about how care was provided.

Care planning was personalised and regularly reviewed. Staff built up good relationships with people and their family members to help them maintain their independence and stay living at home. People told us they did not have cause to complain but knew how to do so if required. End of life care was provided if needed.

Systems and processes were in place to ensure oversight and governance of the service, including a range of regular audits. People told us they found the office and management team helpful and available. There was a positive and open culture. People’s feedback on care was sought through reviews and surveys.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection and update

This service was registered with us on 14 December 2021 and this is the first inspection

Why we inspected

The inspection was undertaken as the service had not been inspected since it was registered.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.