• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Beechcroft - Cheltenham

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

295 Gloucester Road, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL51 7AD (01242) 226960

Provided and run by:
Orchard End Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

7 and 12 May 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 7 and 12 May 2015 and was unannounced. Beechcroft - Cheltenham provides accommodation and personal care for up to four people with a learning disability or autistic spectrum disorder. There were three people living there at the time of the inspection.

A registered manager was in place as required by their conditions of registration. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People’s care was focused around their individual needs and support requirements. People were supported to take part in activities that were meaningful to them and to maintain relationships outside of the home. Staff knew people’s preferences in food and dietary requirements. Specialist advice was requested where necessary such as the speech and language therapist.

People’s medicines were managed safely on the whole however protocols for the use of ‘when required’ medicines lacked the necessary detail to fully support staff in making decisions about people’s care needs .

People living in the home, their relatives and staff were all encouraged to give regular feedback about the service. Any shortfalls were identified and actioned.

The registered manager led by example to provide a service which was tailored to each person’s individual needs and preferences. As part of this, a balance was achieved between keeping people safe and supporting them to make choices and develop their independence. There was strong support and guidance from the provider with regular monitoring of quality.

Staff felt well supported and had the training and supervision they needed to provide personalised support to each person. The provider was committed to the on-going development of their staff and had developed training and managerial programmes to support this.

29 April 2013

During a routine inspection

We were not able to speak to anyone who used the service. This was because they were out on activities during our inspection and because of their communication difficulties. The manager confirmed that staff always explained things to people who used the service. With one person, they were asked to repeat what staff had said to check their understanding. We saw evidence that Deprivation of Liberty assessments had been completed.

The care files were all person centred and fit for purpose. The care plans and risk assessments were all up to date and had been reviewed regularly. Where possible the person who used the service had also been involved in their reviews. People had also signed their care plans and risk assessments. The home was clean and tidy. The provider had good recruitment procedures in place and the home was well staffed with an experienced and stable workforce. The manager told us that they had not received a complaint since 2011, but the concerns we looked at had all been investigated appropriately.

The manager and two other staff that we spoke to, all told us that the home was well staffed. We saw comments from the satisfaction survey completed by people who used the service. These were all positive and included 'they treat me really well, I don't want to move out".

6 July 2012

During a routine inspection

This inspection was part of our planned programme of visits. No concerns had been raised with us before we visited. Due to the nature of the service, we were only able to speak to one person who said "I am happy here and I am able to take part in activities if I want too".

We also saw feedback from questionnaires completed by 10 people at different times over the previous year and all of them stated they were looked after well, and they were involved in everything to do with their care and the home itself.