• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Mrs Sharyn Deidre Buss - 95 Ashley Avenue

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

95 Ashley Avenue, Folkestone, Kent, CT19 4PJ (01303) 266453

Provided and run by:
Mrs Sharyn Deidre Buss

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

13 and 16 November 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 13 and 16 November 2015. As people and staff were usually out during the day we gave the provider short notice of our inspection to ensure that someone would be available to meet us. The inspection was carried out by one inspector. The previous inspection on 20 February 2014 found that there no breaches in the legal requirements.

The service is registered to provide accommodation and personal care to three people who have a learning disability. There were no vacancies at the time of the inspection. The service is a semi-detached house with accommodation over two floors, which stands back a little from a road. Two bedrooms and a shower room are situated on the ground floor. Shared areas are a lounge and kitchen/diner. There is an upstairs bathroom and the third bedroom. The service has small patio garden areas and parking to the front as well as additional on street parking. People freely accessed the service and spent time where they chose.

The service does not require a registered manager as the provider manages this service and another owned by her locally. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People benefited from living in an environment and using equipment that was well maintained. However the electrical wiring certificate had expired and the wiring had not been retested.

Medicines were handled safely and people received them in line with the prescriber’s instructions.

Care plans contained information about people’s wishes and preferences and used pictures and photographs to make them more meaningful. People had regular reviews of their care and support where they were able to discuss or express any concerns or aspirations. Risks were assessed and staff took steps to keep people safe.

People were protected by safe recruitment procedures. New staff underwent an induction programme, including shadowing experienced staff, until staff were competent to work on their own. Staff received training relevant to their role. Staff had opportunities for one to one meetings, staff meetings and appraisals, to enable them to carry out their duties effectively. Some staff had gained qualifications in health and social care. People had their needs met by sufficient numbers of staff. Rotas were based on people’s needs and activities.

People were relaxed in staff’s company and staff listened and acted on what they said. People were treated with dignity and respect and their privacy was respected. Staff were very kind in their approach. Most staff had worked at the service for some considerable time and had built up relationships with people and were familiar with their life stories and preferences.

People had a varied diet and were involved in choosing their meals. Staff understood people’s likes and dislikes and dietary requirements and encouraged people to eat a healthy diet. People attended day centres and did a variety of activities that they had chosen, they regularly accessed the community and had their independence encouraged where possible.

People were supported to maintain good health and attend appointments and check-ups. Appropriate referrals were made to health professionals if and when required.

People did not have any concerns, but felt comfortable in raising issues. Their feedback was gained both informally and formally. The provider and deputy manager worked alongside staff and took action to address any concerns or issues straightaway to help ensure the service ran smoothly.

We found one breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we have asked the provider to take at the end of this report.

20 February 2014

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two people who used the service who had limited verbal communication. We made observations of interactions between the people who used the service, the provider and staff. We also spoke with a social care professional and a relative to gain feedback about the care and support provided.

People told us about the community activities they were involved in and enjoyed. They said they could make their own decisions and choices about what to do and when. We saw and heard from people that their privacy and dignity was respected.

People said they were happy living at 95 Ashley Avenue. One person said, 'I like living here'. A relative said, 'It's feels like a proper home'. People had care plans in place containing lots of photographs demonstrating their likes and needs.

People received safe and coordinated services where more than one provider of services was involved in their care and treatment.

People said there were enough staff on duty and they helped them when they needed help. People said the staff were always kind. People had opportunities to feedback about the service provided.

6 March 2013

During a routine inspection

Three people were living at the home at the time of the inspection. Two people were unable to talk to us directly about their experiences due to their complex needs, so we used a number of different methods to help us understand their experiences. We spoke with staff on duty, read records and observed some of the support that people were given.

People were treated with respect and dignity. They were supported to make decisions about their day to day lives and things that were important to them. People attended activities they enjoyed, chose how they liked their rooms decorated and the items they wanted in them and when they got up and went to bed.

Staff understood people's needs well and their individual preferred methods of communication. People had good relationships with staff and were comfortable spending time with them. A person said they liked the staff and that 'They are all right they are'.

There were enough staff on duty to support people safely and the provider made regular checks on the quality of the service people received.