• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Linden House

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

205 Linden Road, Gloucester, Gloucestershire, GL1 5DU (01452) 524555

Provided and run by:
Care Community Limited

All Inspections

3 June 2016

During a routine inspection

The overall rating for this service is ‘Requires improvement’. However, we are placing the service in 'special measures'. We do this when services have been rated as 'Inadequate' in any key question over two consecutive comprehensive inspections. The ‘Inadequate’ rating does not need to be in the same question at each of these inspections for us to place services in special measures.

The inspection took place on the 3, 6 and 14 June 2016 and was unannounced. Linden House was previously inspected on 10 December 2015, 29 June 2015 and 4 February 2015 to check if breaches of regulations had been met. Prior to this breaches of regulation had been found at an inspection in October 2014 where we issued a warning notice for a lack of effective quality assurance systems. These were for shortfalls with sufficient numbers of staff, staff recruitment, staff support and training and lack of notifications to the Care Quality Commission (CQC).

Linden House is a detached house in a residential area of Gloucester. It provides accommodation and care for six adults with mental health needs. At the time of our inspection there were four people living at the home.

Linden House did not have a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Sufficient numbers of suitably qualified, skilled and experienced persons were not deployed. In addition staff had not received regular supervision sessions.

Some people had not had authorisations made to deprive them of their liberty.

Despite regular checks on the service provided these had not resulted in improvements to areas identified for action such as guidelines for giving people their medicines and maintenance of equipment and the garden.

Staff and management understood how to protect people from harm and abuse. People received personalised care and there were arrangements in place to respond to concerns or complaints from people using the service and their representatives. People were treated with respect and kindness, their privacy and dignity was respected. They were supported to maintain their independence and keep in contact with relatives. People were enabled to be involved in activities such as trips out of the home.

Staff were able to develop knowledge and skills for their role through a programme of training. However staff supervision sessions had not been taking place.

We found breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

10 December 2015

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an unannounced comprehensive inspection of this service on 9 and 10 October 2014. Breaches of legal requirements were found. After the comprehensive inspection, the provider wrote to us to say what they would do to meet the legal requirements.

We undertook a focused inspection on 29 June 2015. At the inspection we found there was still a breach of legal requirements in relation to fit and proper persons employed.

We undertook this focused inspection on the 10 December 2015 to check that the service now met legal requirements. We did not receive a plan of what the registered provider was going to do to meet the legal requirement. This report only covers our findings in relation to that requirement. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for Linden House on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

There had been improvements to staff recruitment procedures although the registered provider’s recruitment policies did not reflect the regulations relating to employment checks for staff working with vulnerable adults.

At the time of our inspection the service did not have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

29 June 2015

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an unannounced comprehensive inspection of this service on 9 and 10 October 2014. Breaches of legal requirements were found. After the comprehensive inspection, the provider wrote to us to say what they would do to meet legal requirements in relation to a breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010 and a breach of the Care Quality Commission (Registration) Regulations 2009.

We undertook this focused inspection to check that they had followed their plan and to confirm that they now met legal requirements. This report only covers our findings in relation to those requirements. A previous focused inspection took place on 4 February 2015. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection and the last focused inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for (location's name) on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

People were still at risk from the appointment of unsuitable staff because improvements had not been made to staff recruitment practices.

There were sufficient numbers of staff to support people.

Improvements had been made to the support provided to staff in terms of training and meetings with senior staff.

People’s health needs were being met through regular appointments with health care professionals.

At the time of our inspection the service did not have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

29 June 2015

During an inspection of this service

4 February 2015

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an unannounced/unannounced comprehensive inspection of this service on 9 and 10 October 2014. Breaches of legal requirements were found. As a result we undertook a focussed inspection on 4 February 2015 to follow up on whether action had been taken to deal with the enforcement action we had taken.

You can find a summary of our findings from both inspections below.

Linden House is a detached house which provides personal care and accommodation for six adults aged 18 years and over with mental health disorders, physical and learning difficulties. The primary aim of Linden House is to help people maintain or increase their independence. Staff support people to take part in activities away from the home, help people to plan and complete tasks around their home and provide emotional and psychological support. Some people occasionally required the support of two staff whilst others only needed staff to be present some of the time. At the time of our visit there were six people living at the home and most had lived there for over two years.

Comprehensive inspection of 9 and 10 October 2014

At the time of this inspection the provider did not have a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run. There had been no registered manager at Linden House since 2011 although managers had been appointed and had applied for registration with CQC they had left before they were registered with us.

People were not kept safe at the home. At times there were not enough staff with the right skills, knowledge or training working in the home to keep people safe and to meet their individual needs. Staff did not have access to an effective system of support or annual reviews of their performance to reflect on their roles and responsibilities or training needs. When new staff were appointed robust recruitment processes had not been followed to make sure all the necessary checks had been completed.

People did not receive an effective service. Their health care needs were not responded to effectively so that they did not receive the care, support and treatment they needed to keep healthy and well.

People’s care was not responsive to their individual needs. Their care plans did not reflect their changing needs. The care they received was inconsistent or they did not always receive the care and support they needed.

The leadership and management of the home failed to effectively monitor the care provided. Risks and concerns were not reacted to promptly. The provider had failed to notify the Care Quality Commission about incidents affecting the wellbeing of people living in the home.

People told us they enjoyed learning new skills so they could be more independent. They were supported to take part in activities of their choice which reflected their interests. People’s cultural and religious beliefs were considered when planning their day. We observed people receiving visitors and choosing where to spend time with them. People made choices and decisions about their day to day lives and discussed with staff their wishes for the future. People told us they liked the food and helped to plan and prepare meals. We observed staff patiently and sensitively supporting people, reassuring them when needed and helping them to become calm. People, their relatives, staff and visitors were asked for their views about the home.

We found a number of breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010 and of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Registration) Regulations 2009. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report. Some of these breaches are outstanding because the provider told us they would not meet them until April 2014.

Focused inspection of 4 February 2015

After our inspection of 9 and 10 October 2014 the provider wrote to us to say what they would do to meet legal requirements in relation to the breaches and the enforcement action we had taken.

We undertook a focused inspection to check that they had followed their plan and to confirm that they are now meeting legal requirements. We found that they had submitted notifications to CQC informing us about accidents and incidents which affected people’s health and well-being. CQC monitors events affecting the welfare, health and safety of people living in the home through the notifications sent to us by providers. The provider had also scheduled monthly visits to the home to monitor the quality of the service being provided.

People living in the home and staff had been involved in monthly visits by the provider, giving their views about the service provided and the changes which had been made. Staff told us there had been significant improvements to the management of the home and the safety and well-being of people living there. Written reports evidenced any issues highlighted and the actions taken to address these. The next quality assurance visit followed up on these actions to make sure they had been completed. Staff said provider quality assurance visits were scheduled to take place each month. Action to address the other breaches highlighted in this report were in hand and on course to be completed within the provider’s timescales.

People’s health care needs were being addressed. Staff had the knowledge and understanding to help people stay well. Staff had contracts of employment and were more confident about their roles and responsibilities.

Fewer incidents had occurred because staff felt more supported and had greater understanding about how to support people. Notifications had been submitted to the CQC appropriately about any accidents or incidents.

A manager had been appointed and had submitted an application for registration with CQC. The provider had made resources available to maintain and improve the service being delivered.

9 October 2014

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 9 and 10 October 2014 and was unannounced.

Linden House is a detached house which provides personal care and accommodation for six adults aged 18 years and over with mental health disorders, physical and learning difficulties. The primary aim of Linden House is to help people maintain or increase their independence. Staff support people to take part in activities away from the home, help people to plan and complete tasks around their home and provide emotional and psychological support. Some people occasionally required the support of two staff whilst others only needed staff to be present some of the time. At the time of our visit there were six people living at the home and most had lived there for over two years.

At the time of our inspection the provider did not have a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run. There had been no registered manager at Linden House since 2011 although managers had been appointed and had applied for registration with CQC they had left before they were registered with us.

People were not kept safe at the home. At times there were not enough staff with the right skills, knowledge or training working in the home to keep people safe and to meet their individual needs. Staff did not have access to an effective system of support or annual reviews of their performance to reflect on their roles and responsibilities or training needs. When new staff were appointed robust recruitment processes had not been followed to make sure all the necessary checks had been completed.

People did not receive an effective service. Their health care needs were not responded to effectively so that they did not receive the care, support and treatment they needed to keep healthy and well.

People’s care was not responsive to their individual needs. Their care plans did not reflect their changing needs. The care they received was inconsistent or they did not always receive the care and support they needed.

The leadership and management of the home failed to effectively monitor the care provided. Risks and concerns were not reacted to promptly. The provider had failed to notify the Care Quality Commission about incidents affecting the wellbeing of people living in the home.

People told us they enjoyed learning new skills so they could be more independent. They were supported to take part in activities of their choice which reflected their interests. People’s cultural and religious beliefs were considered when planning their day. We observed people receiving visitors and choosing where to spend time with them. People made choices and decisions about their day to day lives and discussed with staff their wishes for the future. People told us they liked the food and helped to plan and prepare meals. We observed staff patiently and sensitively supporting people, reassuring them when needed and helping them to become calm. People, their relatives, staff and visitors were asked for their views about the home.

We found a number of breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010 and of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Registration) Regulations 2009. The provider did not protect people from the risks of unsafe care, they did not notify CQC about incidents affecting people's wellbeing and they did not follow safe procedures to recruit new staff or make sure they were supported to develop in their roles. The provider did not have effective systems in place to monitor and review the quality of care provided. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report.

17 October 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

During our inspection in July 2012 we noted that there had been a lack of training and supervision provided to staff. When we visited in May 2013 we found that the provider had only completed supervision for six staff. We took enforcement action and told the provider to put systems in place to achieve compliance by the middle of July 2013. This visit was to check compliance against our enforcement action. We spoke to staff and reviewed supervision records held by the provider.

The provider had a supervision policy in place which stated that all staff would have formal supervision every two months. The provider had a plan to make sure all staff received this.

10 April 2013

During a routine inspection

We inspected this location in July 2012 and found that a number of outcomes were not compliant. We asked the provider to submit an action plan to show how and when they would achieve compliance. This inspection was to follow-up on the provider's compliance and we also looked at some new outcomes. We were not able to talk to any people who used the service during this inspection. We did however look at the care files for all the people who used the service and looked at the satisfaction surveys.

The care files for each person showed us that they were actively involved in planning what they wanted to eat. They were also involved in what they wanted to do and when. The care files had up to date care plans and risk assessments in place. These reflected each person's individual needs. The provider had implemented a new safeguarding policy in September 2012. The manager confirmed that there had been no safeguarding issues since our previous inspection. We looked at the staff training records which showed that the majority of staff had now received safeguarding training.

We reviewed four staff personnel files and found them to be up to date and appropriate. However staff had not received their supervisions or appraisals and we have taken further action on this standard. During this inspection we saw evidence that the provider had completed satisfaction surveys with people who used the service. We also saw evidence that quality monitoring visits had been undertaken.

16 July 2012

During a routine inspection

This was a planned inspection to Linden House. However, due to the nature of the service, we were not able to speak to anyone using the service. However, we inspected records and documents held by the service and observed interactions between staff and people who use the service.

We asked to see feedback from people who use the service, relatives or other professionals visiting the home, but the provider was unable to provide us any examples.