• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Priory Home Care Service

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

10 Paternoster Row, Ottery St Mary, Devon, EX11 1DP (01404) 815511

Provided and run by:
Whisselwell Care Limited

All Inspections

20 January 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place at the agency’s office on 20 January 2016 and was announced. The provider was given short notice because the location provides a domiciliary care service and we needed to be sure that someone would be in. After the visit, we spoke with people using the service, staff and professionals working with the service.

Priory Home Care Service provides personal care to seven people who need assistance in their own homes. The provider, Whisselwell Care Limited, has appointed a registered manager who is one of the owners. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People felt safe and well supported by staff. Staff were reliable and did not miss visits. Senior staff only accepted referrals when staff were available to meet people’s needs. Recruitment was well managed. Staff helped keep people safe because they knew their responsibility to report abuse in a timely manner. Staff knew the importance of infection control and safe medicines practice.

People were supported by regular staff who understood their care needs. This made them feel safe and reassured. The staff group was stable so people received consistent care from staff who knew them well. People’s comments included: ‘All the carers are very polite and discreet in what they do’, ‘I am very pleased with the girls I have’ and ‘all my carers are lovely, very friendly and helpful’. Our conversations with staff confirmed they had a caring manner and wanted to provide consistent care to people.

Staff were committed to providing flexible care, which was responsive to people’s changing needs. Staff knew when to report concerns and changes to people’s health and well-being. Staff knew people well so helped organise additional visits where people were unwell and were unable to attend their usual luncheon clubs.

Staff told us they had the right skills to deliver safe and good quality care. This was because they were supported by an induction and training programme, which was supplemented by supervision and team meetings.

There were effective methods used to assess the quality and safety of the service provided.

18 February 2014

During a routine inspection

Twelve people were receiving a domiciliary care service from the provider on the day that we visited.

People told us how good the service was and they were always treated with courtesy and respect. One person said "The carers always understand what I need and they always respect my privacy".

We observed that care plans were based around each person's individual care and support needs and were reviewed every six months. We noted that care plans contained risk assessments that were linked to people's care needs. For example, moving handling and transfer assessments to support people's mobility to ensure that care that was delivered, was safe.

We observed that safeguarding and whistleblowing policies were in place and we noted that staff had received training in safeguarding. Staff told us that safeguarding training had helped them to understand the different types of abuse and the action they would take if they suspected potential abuse had taken place.

Staff told us they attended a range of training courses and we saw this had been documented in the three staff files we reviewed. Staff received supervision and appraisals which were clearly documented. We identified that mandatory training was not up to date for all staff and suggested the provider should note the importance of regular mandatory training for all staff.

We noted people and their families had completed satisfaction surveys and had all rated the service as excellent or very good.

11 February 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with four people that received support. These people told us that they were treated respectfully and had been involved in planning their care. One person told us that the staff were 'very good. They treat me with dignity and respect, they listen to my views. I am given choices about my care.'

People we spoke with were very positive about the service they received. One person told us that he 'couldn't speak highly enough' of the care provided to his mother." We looked at two care plans and have asked the provider to note that care plans and assessments should be comprehensive and clearly identify assessed needs and actions agreed to support these needs.

Staff we spoke with told us the signs they would look for that may suggest possible abuse and told us what action they would take if they suspected that someone may be abused.

Staff told us that they felt well supported and had the necessary training to do the work but had not received supervision or appraisal in the last year. We suggested that the organisation should note that it is important that staff receive regular supervision and appraisals.

People we spoke with told us that they had been asked by the manager 'several times about the service they had received.' We could not find any record of this and we have suggested that the provider should note it is important to document these checks.