• Care Home
  • Care home

Ashwood Nursing Home - Spalding

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

43 Spalding Common, Spalding, Lincolnshire, PE11 3AU (01775) 723223

Provided and run by:
Country Court Care Homes Limited

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Our view of the service

About the service

 

Ashwood Nursing Home is a care home with nursing. There were 45 people using the service at the time of the inspection.

 

Who the service is for

 

Ashwood Nursing Home supports adults of all ages and people with physical disabilities. Some people were also living with dementia.

 Key findings

We carried out this assessment on 02 September 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives. However, some mental capacity assessments did not fully demonstrate how people had been supported to understand decisions and express their views. The registered manager agreed to improve recording.

There was a positive learning culture where incidents, accidents and feedback were used to improve care. Staff understood safeguarding responsibilities and risks to people's health, safety and wellbeing were assessed with clear guidance in place.

People lived in a clean, welcoming and well maintained environment. Personal quotes displayed outside bedrooms reflected people's individuality and values. Opportunities remained to improve dementia friendly signage to support independence.

There were enough skilled staff to meet people's needs safely. Staff knew people well and recruitment processes supported safe staffing. A particular strength was the open culture created by the registered manager. Anonymous digital feedback systems encouraged engagement, communication and learning. Staff consistently reported feeling valued, supported and listened to.

Medicines were managed safely. Staff received training and regular competency checks. People confirmed they received medicines safely. Minor recording issues relating to medicated skin patches were identified and addressed on the day of inspection. A professional told us, “Our experience of working with Ashwood Nursing Home has been positive. The team demonstrate a caring, organised and resident-focused approach, with a clear commitment to effective medicines management, good communication and the wellbeing and safety of the people in their care.”

Care plans contained clear guidance about people's preferences, health needs and signs of deterioration. Evidence based assessment tools were used and staff respected people's choices and consent. Some records relating to distress would benefit from clearer descriptions of triggers and appropriate responses. We also identified opportunities to use more positive and person-centred language within care records.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Feedback from people and relatives was consistently positive. Staff supported independence and choice. Mealtimes were relaxed and people were supported at their own pace.

Visitors could attend freely and people had access to meaningful activities including exercise, crafts, gardening, church services and social events. Communication needs were considered and accessible information was available. One person benefited from support in their first language and the use of visual communication aids.

People were supported to access healthcare services. Dementia champions had introduced a relatives' coffee afternoon. This gave relatives opportunities to share experiences about the impact of Dementia, access support and build connections with others in similar circumstances. Feedback from relatives who had attended had been positive.

The service continued to explore ways of implementing people’s preferences about having their bedroom door open or closed while balancing safety, privacy and dignity. The registered manager worked with the local authority on a falls prevention project. Subsequently, there were very low levels of falls among people at risk. A relative told us, “When [my family member] was at home, they were falling all the time but have not had one fall since they moved in.” Another relative said they had a similar experience. They told us, “Falls was our big concern as [my family member] was falling when at home. No falls since they have been in the Home.”

23 November 2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Ashwood Nursing Home is a care home which provides nursing and personal care for up to 47 older people. At the time of inspection there were 32 people living in the service.

We found the following examples of good practice.

• Sufficient stocks of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) were in place including masks, gloves, aprons, hand sanitiser and visors. Staff were wearing this appropriately.

• Infection control polices reflected the current national guidance.

• People living in the service and staff were being tested regularly. This was to ensure if any

staff or people had contracted COVID-19 and were asymptomatic, this was identified and acted upon in a timely way.

• There was a clear procedure in place to ensure people were admitted to the service safely.

• A clear process was in place to ensure visitors were screened prior to them entering the service.

• Staff were provided with training in infection prevention and control. The training included modules about infection control, for example, how to put on and remove PPE safely.

• The provider had set up a visiting room to facilitate safe visits between people and their relatives.

• Technology was being used in conjunction with window and outdoor visits to ensure people and their relatives could see each other.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

27 November 2018

During a routine inspection

We inspected Ashwood Nursing Home – Spalding on 27 November 2018. The inspection was unannounced. Ashwood Nursing Home – Spalding is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. The home can accommodate up to 47 older people, some of whom may experience memory loss and physical health needs.

On the day of our inspection 46 people were living in the home.

At our last inspection on 5 April 2016 we rated the service ‘good.’ At this inspection we found the evidence continued to support the rating of ‘good’ overall. There was no evidence or information from our inspection and ongoing monitoring that demonstrated serious risks or concerns. This inspection report is written in a shorter format because our overall rating of the service has not changed since our last inspection.

People continued to receive a safe service. Systems were in place to protect them from avoidable harm and abuse. Risk assessment were regularly updated to ensure people’s changing needs were identified and planned for in a timely way. Staff knew how to protect people’s safety and welfare and received training to ensure their skills and knowledge were up to date. People received their medicines from staff who were appropriately trained. The home environment was adapted to meet people’s needs and staff understood the importance of preventing and controlling the spread of infection.

People continued to receive an effective service. The principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) were followed which meant people’s rights and freedoms were protected. There were sufficient numbers of staff who were safely recruited, appropriately trained and well supported to meet people’s individual needs.

People’s nutritional needs were met and they had access to appropriate healthcare services whenever they needed them.

People continued to receive care from staff who were kind, patient and considerate. They were provided with comfort and reassurance when they became upset or anxious. Their privacy and dignity was fully respected and they had developed positive relationships with staff members.

People continued to receive a responsive service. They were involved in determining how their care was provided and personalised for them. Staff understood people’s needs and preferences well. People were supported to enjoy a varied social life.

There was an open and inclusive culture within the home. People, their family members and staff were encouraged to express their views about how the home was run. There were systems in place to regularly monitor and improve the quality of the services provided.

5 April 2016

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 5 April 2016 and was unannounced.

The home is registered to provide nursing and residential care for 47 people. There were 46 people living at the home on the day of our inspection.

There was a registered manager at the home. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the home. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the home is run.

The Care Quality Commission is required by law to monitor how a provider applies the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and to report on what we find. DoLS were in place to protect people where they do not have capacity to make decisions and where it is considered necessary to restrict their freedom in some way. This is usually to protect themselves. The registered manager had made appropriate requests for people to assessed under the DoLS and all the care provided minimised the restriction on people.

People were care for staff who worked together to ensure that the care provided was personalised to people’s individual needs. Staff were able to do this as the planning completed by the registered manager ensured that there were always enough staff on duty allowing staff to spend quality time with people. The provider and registered manager were supportive of staff and ensured that the mandatory training provided them with the skills needed to provide person centred care. In addition, more specialised training was available to support people’s individual needs which improved people’s health and reduced their pain.

People received care from a staff group which were engaged, kind and caring. Staff focused on people’s needs and constantly checked to ensure people were safe, comfortable and happy. The kindness provided included ensuring the families of people living at the home were safe and supported. People and their relatives were involved in planning their care and were kept up to date with any changes in care needs. People were supported to lead active lives and to access the local community on a regular basis. In addition people were supported to be entertained by staff who provided activities on a daily basis.

The quality of information in the care plans was good and they supported staff to ensure that the care they provided was tailored to people’s individual needs. Risks to people were identified and care was planned and equipment was available to ensure people were protected. Mealtimes were a pleasant experience with plenty of staff to support people on an individual basis when needed. People’s abilities to eat safely and to maintain a healthy weight were monitored. When needed people were appropriately referred for professional advice and support. The administration of medicines was done in a methodical way which reduced the risk of errors. The nurses administering the medicines took time to speak with people and advise them what medicines they were taking which ensured people were involved in their care.

The registered manager was approachable and staff, people living at the home and visitors were all complimentary about the way they ran the home. There were audit systems in place to monitor the quality of the care people received and these were implemented effectively by the registered manager. The provider ensured the registered manager and staff were supported to provide good care by employing staff at head office who kept up to date with any changes in how care should be provided. This enabled the provider to disseminate the latest guidance around best practice and any changes in legislation effectively and consistently. In addition the provider’s culture was that of an open organisation with a no blame culture which supported learning across their care homes as well as within each home.

21 October 2013

During a routine inspection

All of the six people with whom we spoke gave us positive feedback about the service. One of them said, 'The staff are kind to us and are very helpful. They're always polite and I don't have any concerns.'

People had been given accurate information about the fees they would have to pay. Records showed that people had been correctly charged for the facilities and services they had received.

People said or showed us that they received all of the health and personal care they needed. Records confirmed that assistance had been provided in a safe, reliable and responsive way.

There were safe systems for managing medication so that people received the right medicines at the right time.

Staff had received the training and support they needed to provide care for people in the right way.

There was an effective complaints system so that people could raise concerns and have them resolved.

26 April 2012

During a routine inspection

On the day we visited Ashwood Nursing Home there were 46 people living there. The manager of the home was on leave at the time of our visit. However, a manager who had been managing the home for three weeks was available and able to answer any questions about the home and the people who lived there.

We saw the home was maintained to a good standard and people looked comfortable and well cared for. There were good relationships between the staff and people living at the home.

People told us they liked living at the home. One person said, 'The staff are ever so good, really they are. I eat what I want and it's very nice, puddings are lovely.'

Relatives we spoke with told us they were happy with the care provided. One relative told us, 'Everyone is friendly and the room is always clean. Mum always looks nice.' Another relative said, 'Mum is as happy and settled as she could be. It's an all round good home.'