• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Orchard House

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Green Lane, Wolverton, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, MK12 5EZ (01908) 321359

Provided and run by:
Milton Keynes Council

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 16 September 2015

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service.

We undertook a focused follow up inspection of Orchard House on 24 August 2015. This inspection was completed to check that improvements to meet legal requirements planned by the provider after our comprehensive inspection on 2 February 2015 had been made. We inspected the service against one of the five questions we ask about services: Is the service well- led. This is because the service was not previously meeting legal requirements in relation to the well-led domain.

The inspection was announced. We gave the provider 48 hours’ notice of the inspection to ensure that staff were available. The inspection team consisted of one inspector.

Before our inspection we reviewed the information we held about the service, this included the provider’s action plan, which set out the action they would take to meet legal requirements. We checked the information we held about the service and the provider and made contact with the local authority to obtain additional information.

During our inspection, we spoke with the registered manager. We also looked at records relating to the management of the service, including quality audits to ensure that action had been taken to make required improvements.

Overall inspection

Requires improvement

Updated 16 September 2015

Orchard House is registered to provide personal care for people over 55 years old in their own homes and within sheltered accommodation. The service provides rehabilitation and re-enablement care, within 18 individual on-site flats, as well as rapid response care for people in their own homes during the night. At the time of our inspection 15 of the flats were occupied.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

During our inspection on 2 February 2015, we found that the registered person did not have effective systems designed to enable them to regularly assess and monitor the quality of the services provided in the carrying on of the regulated activities. We found that the audit checks that had been completed were not always effective in identifying the issues that we found or detailing the action that needed to be taken to address them. This was a breach of regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) 2014.

Following the inspection the provider sent us an action plan detailing the improvements they were going to make, and stating that improvements would be achieved by early August 2015.

This report only covers our findings in relation to the outstanding breaches of regulation. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for ‘Orchard House on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This follow up inspection took place on 24 August 2015 and was announced.

During this inspection, we found that improvements had been made to the audit systems in place within the service, to ensure that appropriate standards of record keeping and data management were in place, and overviewed and monitored on a regular basis. We found that the systems in place had been strengthened which meant that any issues could be identified and addressed in a timely manner.

While improvements had been made which means that the service is no longer in breach of regulations, we have not revised the rating for this key question. To improve the rating to ‘Good’ would require a longer term track record of consistent good practice. We will review our rating for well- led at the next comprehensive inspection.